Analysis of a nurses’ knowledge survey on the use of physical restraint in intensive care units

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 47-58
Author(s):  
G. Via-Clavero ◽  
L. Claramunt-Domènech ◽  
A. García-Lamigueiro ◽  
M.M. Sánchez-Sánchez ◽  
M. Secanella-Martínez ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tilahun Kassew ◽  
Ambaye Dejen Tilahun ◽  
Bikis Liyew

Background. Physical restraint is a common practice in the intensive care units which often result in frequent skin laceration at restraint site, limb edema, restricted circulation, and worsening of agitation that may even end in death. Despite the sensitivity of the problem, however, it is felt that there are nurses’ evidence-based practice gaps in Ethiopia. To emphasize the importance of this subject, relevant evidence is required to develop protocols and to raise evidence-based practices of health professionals. So, this study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, and influencing factors of nurses regarding physical restraint use in the intensive care units in northwest Ethiopia. Methods. An institution-based cross-sectional study was maintained from March to September 2019 at Amhara regional state referral hospitals, northwest Ethiopia. A total of 260 nurses in the intensive care units were invited to take part in the study by a convenience sampling technique. The Level of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Staff regarding Physical Restraints Questionnaire was used to assess the nurses’ knowledge and attitude. Linear regression analysis was employed to examine the influencing factors of knowledge and attitude. Adjusted unstandardized beta (β) coefficient with a 95% confidence interval was used to report the result of association with a p value < 0.05 statistical significance level. Result. The mean scores of nurses’ knowledge and attitude regarding physical restraint use among critically ill patients were 7.81 ± 1.89 and 33.75 ± 6.50, respectively. These mean scores are above the scale midpoint nearer to the higher ranges which imply a moderate level of knowledge and a good attitude regarding physical restraint. Lower academic qualification and short (<2 years) work experience were associated with lower-level of knowledge, and reading about restraint from any source and taken training regarding restraints were factors associated with a higher knowledge. Diploma and bachelor’s in academic qualification were significantly associated with a negative attitude regarding restraint. Besides, there was a more positive attitude among nurses with a higher level of knowledge and who received training regarding physical restraint use. Conclusion. The nurses working in the intensive care unit had a moderate level of knowledge and a good attitude regarding physical restraint use. So, developing and providing educational and in-service training to the nurses regarding physical restraint are necessary to strengthen the quality of care for critically ill patients.


2010 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-34
Author(s):  
P. Fulbrook ◽  
J. Albarran ◽  
B. Baktoft ◽  
B. Sidebottom

2020 ◽  
pp. 175114371989278
Author(s):  
Zahra Salehi ◽  
Soodabeh Joolaee ◽  
Fatemeh Hajibabaee ◽  
Tahereh Najafi Ghezeljeh

Background Physical restraint is widely used in intensive care units to ensure patient safety, manage agitated patients, and prevent the removal of medical equipment connected to them. However, physical restraint use is a major healthcare challenge worldwide. Aim This study aimed to explore nurses' experiences of the challenges of physical restraint use in intensive care units. Methods This qualitative study was conducted in 2018–2019. Twenty critical care nurses were purposively recruited from the intensive care units of four hospitals in Tehran, Iran. Data were collected via in-depth semi-structured interviews, concurrently analyzed via Graneheim and Lundman's conventional content analysis approach, and managed via MAXQDA software (v. 10.0). Findings Three main themes were identified (i) organizational barriers to effective physical restraint use (lack of quality educations for nurses about physical restraint use, lack of standard guidelines for physical restraint use, lack of standard physical restraint equipment), (ii) ignoring patients' wholeness (their health and rights), and (iii) distress over physical restraint use (emotional and mental distress, moral conflict, and inability to find an appropriate alternative for physical restraint). Conclusion Critical care nurses face different organizational, ethical, and emotional challenges in using physical restraint. Healthcare managers and authorities can reduce these challenges by developing standard evidence-based guidelines, equipping hospital wards with standard equipment, implementing in-service educational programs, supervising nurses' practice, and empowering them for finding and using alternatives to physical restraint. Nurses can also reduce these challenges through careful patient assessment, using appropriate alternatives to physical restraint, and consulting with their expert colleagues.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 100183
Author(s):  
Omar M. Al-Tarawneh ◽  
Waddah M. D'emeh ◽  
Mohammed Ibrahim Yacoub

Critical Care ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. R46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Luk ◽  
Barbara Sneyers ◽  
Louise Rose ◽  
Marc M Perreault ◽  
David R Williamson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 4-11
Author(s):  
Pavlína Štrbová ◽  
Eleonora Dostálová ◽  
Karel Urbánek

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela Freitas dos Santos ◽  
Ester Góes Oliveira ◽  
Regina Cláudia Silva Souza

ABSTRACT Objectives: to describe the available evidence on indications, complications, care and alternative strategies in the use of physical restraint in adult patients in Intensive Care Units. Methods: an integrative review conducted in the LILACS, Nursing Database, Índice Bibliográfico Español en Ciencias de la Salud, Scopus and CINAHL databases and the PubMed portal, in the period from June to August 2018. Results: the final selection was of 19 articles, from which the indications, complications, care and alternative strategies were extracted. The studies were conducted between the years 2003 and 2018, with a predominance of the United States; they were mostly classified (58%) in level 6 evidence, being performed by nurses, with multi-professional participation of psychologists, pharmacists, physicians, and nurses. Conclusions: the most common practices regarding physical restriction were described, and the need for the elaboration and implementation of protocols on intervention to support decision making was observed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document