Sensor placement for model identification of multi-story buildings under unknown earthquake ground motion

2022 ◽  
Vol 251 ◽  
pp. 113548
Author(s):  
Tao Yin ◽  
Feng-Liang Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Sensor Placement ◽  
Model Identification ◽  
Earthquake Ground Motion

scholarly journals Seismic rocking effects on a mine tower under induced and natural earthquakes

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Adam Bońkowski ◽  
Juliusz Kuś ◽  
Zbigniew Zembaty
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Response ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Ground Surface ◽  
Tall Buildings ◽  
Earthquake Ground Motion ◽  
Seismic Action ◽  
Seismic Effects ◽  
Copper Ore ◽  
Rotational Components ◽  
Natural Earthquakes

AbstractRecent research in engineering seismology demonstrated that in addition to three translational seismic excitations along x, y and z axes, one should also consider rotational components about these axes when calculating design seismic loads for structures. The objective of this paper is to present the results of a seismic response numerical analysis of a mine tower (also called in the literature a headframe or a pit frame). These structures are used in deep mining on the ground surface to hoist output (e.g. copper ore or coal). The mine towers belong to the tall, slender structures, for which rocking excitations may be important. In the numerical example, a typical steel headframe 64 m high is analysed under two records of simultaneous rocking and horizontal seismic action of an induced mine shock and a natural earthquake. As a result, a complicated interaction of rocking seismic effects with horizontal excitations is observed. The contribution of the rocking component may sometimes reduce the overall seismic response, but in most cases, it substantially increases the seismic response of the analysed headframe. It is concluded that in the analysed case of the 64 m mining tower, the seismic response, including the rocking ground motion effects, may increase up to 31% (for natural earthquake ground motion) or even up to 135% (for mining-induced, rockburst seismic effects). This means that not only in the case of the design of very tall buildings or industrial chimneys but also for specific yet very common structures like mine towers, including the rotational seismic effects may play an important role.

Forearc versus Backarc Attenuation of Earthquake Ground Motion

2011 ◽  
Vol 101 (6) ◽  
pp. 3032-3045 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Ghofrani ◽  
G. M. Atkinson
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Earthquake Ground Motion

Influences of subsurface geological structure neighboring geological repository on earthquake motion of the site

2009 ◽  
Vol 1193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taishi Oouchi ◽  
Hiroyuki Tsuchi ◽  
Tetsuya Ota ◽  
Koji Hane ◽  
Toru Sasaki
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Velocity Structure ◽  
Geological Structure ◽  
Earthquake Ground Motion ◽  
Seismic Motion ◽  
Earthquake Resistant Design ◽  
Geological Repository ◽  
Subsurface Layers ◽  
Deep Underground ◽  
Structural Boundary

AbstractAccording to recent seismic observation records, there are some cases where unexpectedly large seismic motion was observed deep underground and that was larger than at the surface. The factors influencing such phenomena are assumed to be deep geological structures with topographic irregularity, velocity structure and non-linearity of subsurface layers. These factors should be taken into account in the earthquake-resistant design of a geological repository. The influence of a deep underground geological structure with topographic irregularity on ground motion has been studied and it has been confirmed that such a structure have a significant impact on ground motion and the constructive interference of waves may result in strong earthquake ground motion in the vicinity of a structural boundary deep underground.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document