scholarly journals Navigating the participatory processes of renewable energy infrastructure regulation: A ‘local participant perspective’ on the NSIPs regime in England and Wales

Energy Policy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 201-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Natarajan ◽  
Y. Rydin ◽  
S.J. Lock ◽  
M. Lee
2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 447-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rupp Carriveau ◽  
Afsaneh Edrisy ◽  
Peter Cadieux ◽  
Russel Mailloux

2021 ◽  
pp. 251484862110543
Author(s):  
Sean F Kennedy ◽  
Ryan Stock

California is one of the most climate-challenged regions of North America and is considered the vanguard of climate action in the United States. California's climate policy framework has strongly promoted the expansion of renewable energy infrastructure, and the state generates more solar energy than any other in the nation. Using the case of Lancaster, a city of 170,000 residents in northern Los Angeles County seeking to position itself as the “alternative energy capital of the world,” this article examines private investments in solar energy infrastructure as a response to California's entwined economic and ecological crises. Drawing on recent scholarship on socioecological fix, we argue that private accumulation through renewable energy infrastructures in California has required both the presence of crisis conditions and innovations in financial risk mitigation that manage tensions between mobility and fixity inherent in the formation of fixed capital. However, a narrow focus on short-term financial risk obviates other forms of risk, including future impacts of extreme weather on grid infrastructure and electricity supply. While this does not foreclose opportunities for solar energy infrastructure to support positive social and ecological transformation, we argue that such opportunities may be constrained under a mode of energy transition predicated on private accumulation.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selvakumar Karuppiah ◽  
Velu Duraisamy ◽  
Sakkarapalayam Murugesan Senthil Kumar

Electrocatalytic water splitting into oxygen and hydrogen is related to the utilization of non-renewable energy resources significantly and leads to sustainable energy infrastructure. The highly efficient bifunctional catalysts for oxygen...


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Dunlap

Governments and corporations exclaim that “energy transition” to “renewable energy” is going to mitigate ecological catastrophe. French President Emmanuel Macron makes such declarations, but what is the reality of energy infrastructure development? Examining the development of a distributional energy transformer substation in the village of Saint-Victor-et-Melvieu, this article argues that “green” infrastructures are creating conflict and ecological degradation and are the material expression of climate catastrophe. Since 1999, the Aveyron region of southern France has become a desirable area of the so-called renewable energy development, triggering a proliferation of energy infrastructure, including a new transformer substation in St. Victor. Corresponding with this spread of “green” infrastructure has been a 10-year resistance campaign against the transformer. In December 2014, the campaign extended to building a protest site, and ZAD, in the place of the transformer called L’Amassada. Drawing on critical agrarian studies, political ecology, and human geography literatures, the article discusses the arrival process of the transformer, corrupt political behavior, misinformation, and the process of bureaucratic land grabbing. This also documents repression against L’Amassada and their relationship with the Gilets Jaunes “societies in movement.” Finally, the notion of infrastructural colonization is elaborated, demonstrating its relevance to understanding the onslaught of climate and ecological crisis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document