Menstrual cycle characteristics and reproductive hormone levels in women exposed to atrazine in drinking water

2011 ◽  
Vol 111 (8) ◽  
pp. 1293-1301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lori A. Cragin ◽  
James S. Kesner ◽  
Annette M. Bachand ◽  
Dana Boyd Barr ◽  
Juliana W. Meadows ◽  
...  
1977 ◽  
pp. 293-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold Persky ◽  
Harold I. Lief ◽  
Charles P. O’Brien ◽  
Dorothy Strauss ◽  
William Miller

Reproduction ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Newton ◽  
D Joyce ◽  
B Pearce ◽  
C Revell ◽  
J Tyler

Author(s):  
Sarah Johnson ◽  
Sarah Weddell ◽  
Sonya Godbert ◽  
Guenter Freundl ◽  
Judith Roos ◽  
...  

AbstractUrinary hormone level analysis provides valuable fertility status information; however, previous studies have not referenced levels to the ovulation day, or have used outdated methods. This study aimed to produce reproductive hormone ranges referenced to ovulation day determined by ultrasound.Women aged 18–40 years (no reported infertility) collected daily urine samples for one complete menstrual cycle. Urinary luteinising hormone (LH), estrone-3-glucuronide (E3G, an estradiol metabolite), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and pregnanediol-3-glucuronide (P3G, a progesterone metabolite) were measured using previously validated assays. Volunteers underwent trans-vaginal ultrasound every 2 days until the dominant ovarian follicle size reached 16 mm, when daily scans were performed until ovulation was observed. Data were analysed to create hormone ranges referenced to the day of objective ovulation as determined by ultrasound.In 40 volunteers, mean age 28.9 years, urinary LH surge always preceded ovulation with a mean of 0.81 days; thus LH is an excellent assay-independent predictor of ovulation. The timing of peak LH was assay-dependent and could be post-ovulatory; therefore should no longer be used to predict/determine ovulation. Urinary P3G rose from baseline after ovulation in all volunteers, peaking a median of 7.5 days following ovulation. Median urinary peak E3G and FSH levels occurred 0.5 days prior to ovulation. A persistent rise in urinary E3G was observed from approximately 3 days pre- until 5 days post-ovulation.This study provides reproductive hormone ranges referenced to the actual day of ovulation as determined by ultrasound, to facilitate examination of menstrual cycle endocrinology.


Andrology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 416-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Yoshinaga ◽  
K. Imai ◽  
H. Shiraishi ◽  
S. Nozawa ◽  
M. Yoshiike ◽  
...  

1982 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. lii
Author(s):  
M.J. Wheeler ◽  
N. Nanjee ◽  
B.K. Toone ◽  
P.C.B. Fenwick

2008 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 395-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Streuli ◽  
Timothée Fraisse ◽  
Christine Pillet ◽  
Victoria Ibecheole ◽  
Paul Bischof ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 511-517
Author(s):  
Xiao-Xiao Jin ◽  
Ling Sun ◽  
Xiao-Li Lai ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
Mei-Li Liang ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-16
Author(s):  
Ivan Shun Ho ◽  
Navneet K. Parmar

Over the past 10 years, college textbooks in human anatomy and physiology have typically presented the events of the ovulatory menstrual cycle in a linear format, with time in days shown on the x-axis, and hormone levels, follicular development, and uterine lining on the y-axis. In addition, the various events are often shown over a 28-day cycle, when they can take place over 21–35 days and may not be regular at all. Here, we propose a circular diagram that is independent of a set cycle time and readily shows the cyclic nature of the events. This diagram can be presented sequentially in organized layers, and additional complexity can be added. In addition, we present questions here that can promote self-learning before and critical thinking after the discussion of the cycle to enhance understanding of the physiological events.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (22) ◽  
pp. 3620-3626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clive S. Grant ◽  
James N. Ingle ◽  
Vera J. Suman ◽  
Daniel A. Dumesic ◽  
D. Lawrence Wickerham ◽  
...  

Purpose For nearly two decades, multiple retrospective reports, small prospective studies, and meta-analyses have arrived at conflicting results regarding the value of timing surgical intervention for breast cancer on the basis of menstrual cycle phase. We present the results of a multi–cooperative group, prospective, observational trial of menstrual cycle phase and outcome after breast cancer surgery, led by the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) in collaboration with the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) and the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Patients and Methods Premenopausal women age 18 to 55 years, who were interviewed for menstrual history and who were surgically treated for stages I to II breast cancer, had serum drawn within 1 day of surgery for estradiol, progesterone, and luteinizing hormone levels. Menstrual history and hormone levels were used to determine menstrual phase: luteal, follicular, and other. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were determined by Kaplan-Meier method and were compared by using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard modeling. Results Of 1,118 women initially enrolled, 834 women comprised the study cohort: 230 (28%) in luteal phase; 363 (44%) in follicular phase; and 241 grouped as other. During a median follow-up of 6.6 years, and in analysis that accounted for nodal disease, estrogen receptor status, adjuvant radiation therapy or chemotherapy, neither DFS nor OS differed with respect to menstrual phase. The 5-year DFS rates were 82.7%, 82.1%, and 79.2% for follicular, luteal, or other phases, respectively. Corresponding OS survival rates were 91.9%, 92.2%, and 91.8%, respectively. Conclusion When menstrual cycle phases were strictly defined, neither DFS nor OS differed between women who underwent surgery during the follicular phase versus the luteal phase. Nearly 30% of the patients did not meet criteria for either follicular- or luteal-phase categories.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document