Recent advances on thermal energy storage using metal-organic frameworks (MOFs)

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 102179
Author(s):  
Nokubonga Makhanya ◽  
Bilainu Oboirien ◽  
Jianwei Ren ◽  
Nicholas Musyoka ◽  
Adriano Sciacovelli
Keyword(s):  
Energy Storage ◽  
Thermal Energy ◽  
Thermal Energy Storage ◽  
Metal Organic Frameworks ◽  
Recent Advances ◽  
Metal Organic

Metal–Organic Frameworks for Ammonia‐Based Thermal Energy Storage

Small ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 2102689
Author(s):  
Guoliang An ◽  
Xiaoxiao Xia ◽  
Shaofei Wu ◽  
Zhilu Liu ◽  
Liwei Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Storage ◽  
Thermal Energy ◽  
Thermal Energy Storage ◽  
Metal Organic Frameworks ◽  
Metal Organic

Metal–Organic Phase-Change Materials for Thermal Energy Storage

2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (45) ◽  
pp. 19170-19180
Author(s):  
Ryan D. McGillicuddy ◽  
Surendra Thapa ◽  
Malia B. Wenny ◽  
Miguel I. Gonzalez ◽  
Jarad A. Mason
Keyword(s):  
Energy Storage ◽  
Phase Change ◽  
Organic Phase ◽  
Thermal Energy ◽  
Thermal Energy Storage ◽  
Phase Change Materials ◽  
Metal Organic

Energy storage analysis of CO2 in MOF-74 and UIO-66 nanoparticles: A molecular simulation study

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (18) ◽  
pp. 1950196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang Wang ◽  
Shengli Tang
Keyword(s):  
Energy Storage ◽  
Adsorption Capacity ◽  
Thermal Energy ◽  
Thermal Energy Storage ◽  
Working Fluid ◽  
Thermodynamic Cycles ◽  
Different Temperatures ◽  
Energy Storage Properties ◽  
Metal Organic ◽  
Adsorption Of Co

Adding porous nanoparticles into fluid can modify the energy storage properties of working fluid in the thermodynamic cycles. The adsorption capacity and thermal energy storage of CO2 in MOF-74 and UIO-66 at different temperatures and pressures are investigated in this paper via molecular simulations. The results denote that the adsorption of CO2 in the two studied metal organic frameworks (MOFs) differ from each other due to the different structures. The adsorption capacity of CO2 in MOF-74 is larger than that in UIO-66. However, the desorption heat of CO2 in MOF-74 is lower than that in UIO-66. Also, UIO-66 impacts more than MOF-74 on the thermal energy storage property of CO2.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document