The political economy of long-term care

2013 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. 154-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Nuscheler ◽  
Kerstin Roeder
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristiano Gori

The ageing of the countries’ populations, and in particular the growing number of the very old, is increasing the need for long-term care (LTC). Not surprisingly, therefore, the financing of LTC systems has become a crucial topic across the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). In the last three decades, various financing policies have been carried out in different countries and the related international debate has grown. The latter has so far focused mostly on the different alternatives to collect economic resources to pay for care. The international debate needs now to focus also on other issues, so far less discussed. One is the politics of LTC: the degree and nature of the political interest in LTC, that affects the size and profile of public financing. The other is resource allocation: how different services and benefits are distributed among people with different care needs, that determines if resources made available are optimized. If we do not pay more attention to these issues – inextricably connected to policies aimed to collect funds – our understanding of LTC financing will remain inevitably limited.


Author(s):  
Tamara J Daly ◽  
Ruth Lowndes

This chapter explores how we approached and conducted creative team interviewing during this multiyear ethnographic study of long-term care homes. We discuss interviewing from the theoretical standpoint of feminist political economy and feminist and interpretive interviewing. We outline our creative team interviewing method, as well as identify examples of what worked well and the relational, spatial, and temporal challenges we addressed. The chapter’s final section offers critical reflections on our contributions to creative team interviewing. Specifically, an explicitly feminist orientation in our research enabled us to use interviewing to pay attention to the everyday realities of the work and care in long-term care settings. Feminist political economy enabled us to see and hear experiences from nursing homes in context and in relation to others who live, work, and visit.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 680-680
Author(s):  
Michael Lepore

Abstract A decades-long policy impasse has crippled our national capacity to finance long-term care (LTC) sufficiently or equitably, leaving large swaths of the US population at risk of going broke paying privately for LTC or having unmet LTC needs, while also draining state and federal budgets. By reviewing past LTC financing policy efforts—from the passage of the Social Security Act and the enactment of Medicaid and Medicare, to the LTC financing proposals advanced by 2020 presidential candidates—the political interplay of budgetary concerns in government spending and social justice concerns regarding access to care emerged as a primary LTC policymaking issue. Establishing national consensus on the prioritization of these fiscal and social justice concerns, and their respective values, could help lawmakers craft policy capable of generating the political will needed to overcome political gridlock. Clarifying how LTC benefits would be paid for appears to be a relatively straightforward technical task in comparison.


Author(s):  
Josien de Klerk ◽  
Barbara Da Roit

In the Netherlands the recent shift to a ‘participation society’ has led to a reconfiguration of health care arrangements for long-term care. The new long-term care act, scheduled to commence January 2015, forms the political realization of the participation society: people are expected to decrease their dependency on state provisions and instead become self-sufficient or dependent on family and community solidarity. In this Think Piece we argue that the implicit references of policy makers to pre-welfare state community solidarity and self-sufficiency do not adequately consider the historical and social embeddedness of care. Referring to Rose’s concept of ‘politics of conduct’ we argue that in framing care as a moral obligation, the current politics of conduct may obscure the physical and psychological heaviness of intimate care between family members, the diversity of care relations, and their sociohistorical embeddedness.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document