Predictors of the subjective-objective cognition discrepancy in unipolar disorder

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. S71
Author(s):  
J.Z. Petersen ◽  
R.J. Porter ◽  
K.W. Miskowiak
Keyword(s):  
1980 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miron Baron

Twin data on bipolar and unipolar affective disorders are analyzed by multiple threshold models of inheritance. The two illness types are represented in the models on a continuum of genetic–environmental liability in which bipolar illness has a higher liability threshold than unipolar disorder. Autosomal single major locus model provides an acceptable fit to observed concordance rates in monozygotic twins. The multifactorial-polygenic model is rejected.


2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (05) ◽  
pp. 200-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
René Nielsen ◽  
Lars Kessing ◽  
Willem Nolen ◽  
Rasmus Licht

Abstract Introduction Lithium is established as an effective treatment of mania, of depression in bipolar and unipolar disorder, and in maintenance treatment of these disorders. However, due to the necessity of monitoring and concerns about irreversible adverse effects, in particular renal impairment, after long-term use, lithium might be underutilized. Methods This study reviewed 6 large observational studies addressing the risk of impaired renal function associated with lithium treatment and methodological issues impacting interpretation of results. Results An increased risk of renal impairment associated with lithium treatment is suggested. This increased risk may, at least partly, be a result of surveillance bias. Additionally, the earliest studies pointed toward an increased risk of end-stage renal disease associated with lithium treatment, whereas the later and methodologically most sound studies do not. Discussion The improved renal outcome found in the more recent lithium studies may be a result of improved monitoring and focus on recommended serum levels (preferentially 0.6–0.8 mmol/L) as compared to poorer renal outcome in studies with patients treated in the 1960s to 1980s.


2018 ◽  
Vol 232 ◽  
pp. 212-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Kærsgaard ◽  
I. Meluken ◽  
LV. Kessing ◽  
M. Vinberg ◽  
KW. Miskowiak

Author(s):  
Ian Jones

It is of great regret that although corresponding with him at the start of my research career, I never met Channi Kumar face to face. His work, however, as evidenced by this book, remains an important influence on our field. I share his belief in the ‘maternal brain as a model for investigating mental illness’ (Kumar 2001), and this conviction has underlined much of my research. In this chapter I will discuss the concept of postpartum psychosis (PP), explore what we know about the relationship of these episodes to other mood and psychotic disorders, and consider research strategies aimed at understanding the nature of the postpartum trigger. I will argue that the nosological confusion surrounding this condition has been unhelpful and that it is time, perhaps, to consider whether we should revive postpartum psychosis as a diagnostic concept. Episodes of mood disorder in relation to pregnancy and childbirth are very common. In our group we have recently examined the history of perinatal episodes in over 1,500 women with mood disorder who have participated in our genetic studies and find that approximately two thirds of parous women, with both bipolar and unipolar disorder, have experienced a significant mood episode in the perinatal period (Di Florio et al. 2013). PP refers to some of the most severe forms of postpartum psychiatric disorder. Although the boundaries of this condition are not easy to define, the core concept is the acute onset of a manic or affective psychosis in the immediate postpartum period. Depending on the definition employed, the incidence is approximately 1 in 1,000 deliveries (Jones et al. 2010). Women may go from being very well to severely ill within hours. Affective (mood) symptoms, both elation and depression, are prominent, as is a disturbance of consciousness marked by an apparent confusion, bewilderment, or perplexity. As the name suggests, psychotic phenomena occur, with delusions and hallucinations prominent. Some women with severe manic episodes, but who do not show psychotic symptoms, may receive the diagnosis, although it is also possible to reserve the label for those women with frank psychotic presentations.


2001 ◽  
Vol 58 (9) ◽  
pp. 844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Urban Ösby ◽  
Lena Brandt ◽  
Nestor Correia ◽  
Anders Ekbom ◽  
Pär Sparén

1990 ◽  
Vol 157 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Dolan ◽  
A. M. Poynton ◽  
P. K. Bridges ◽  
M. R. Trimble

The MRI T1 proton relaxation values were assessed in 14 patients with bipolar affective disorder and 10 with a unipolar disorder and a matched normal control group. The T1 values in the frontal white matter of patients significantly exceeded those of the controls. This difference was accounted for by an increase in T1 values in the frontal white matter of unipolar patients: the values for bipolar patients alone did not differ from those for controls. These preliminary findings support a hypothesis of frontal lobe dysfunction mediating pathological changes in mood.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document