scholarly journals Changing Radiotherapy Paradigms in Penile Cancer

2022 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 47-48
Author(s):  
Peter A.S. Johnstone ◽  
Philippe E. Spiess ◽  
Geoff Sedor ◽  
G. Daniel Grass ◽  
Kosj Yamoah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 423-423
Author(s):  
David J. Ralph ◽  
Vineet Agarwal ◽  
Suks Minhas ◽  
Nim Christopher

1997 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 582-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuko HANNITA ◽  
Yasushi NAGAMINE ◽  
Keisuke HAGIWARA ◽  
Hiroshi UEZATO ◽  
Shigeo NONAKA ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Branney ◽  
Karl Witty

Drawing upon concepts of expressive equipment and body image, the aim of this study is to explore how men diagnosed and treated for penile cancer construct their penis and its surgical disfigurement (penectomy). Using maximum variation sampling with the intention to acquire the broadest range of experiences of stage of disease and treatment, 27 cisgender men (aged 48-83, x=63) who had surgical treatment consented for their data to be archived for analysis. From a dramaturgical perspective, the constructionist thematic analysis explored direct and indirect talk about the penis after surgery. The analysis showed that through graphic and sequential narratives of dismemberment revealed, participants constructed a post-surgery period in which they both wanted and did-not-want to see their penis. Additionally, participants constructed themselves managing difficult emotions through others and seeing themselves being rejected by a potentially desiring (female) Other. The findings extend research on male genitals by showing how the post-surgery penis can function as something hidden but visceral and traumatic when revealed. Importantly, this paper illustrates body image as expressive equipment where body and identity are formed in the image of manhood, which is an intersubjective (sexual) object between self and other.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2323
Author(s):  
Anita Thomas ◽  
Sascha Reetz ◽  
Philipp Stenzel ◽  
Katrin Tagscherer ◽  
Wilfried Roth ◽  
...  

The PI3K/mTOR/AKT pathway might represent an intriguing option for treatment of penile cancer (PeCa). We aimed to assess whether members of this pathway might serve as biomarkers and targets for systemic therapy. Tissue of primary cancer from treatment-naïve PeCa patients was used for tissue microarray analysis. Immunohistochemical staining was performed with antibodies against AKT, pAKT, mTOR, pmTOR, pS6, pPRAS, p4EBP1, S6K1 and pp70S6K. Protein expression was correlated with clinicopathological characteristics as well as overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS). AKT inhibition was tested in two primarily established, treatment-naïve PeCa cell lines by treatment with capivasertib and analysis of cell viability and chemotaxis. A total of 76 patients surgically treated for invasive PeCa were included. Higher expression of AKT was significantly more prevalent in high-grade tumors and predictive of DSS and OS in the Kaplan–Meier analysis, and an independent predictor of worse OS and DSS in the multivariate regression analysis. Treatment with pan-AKT inhibitor capivasertib in PeCa cell lines induced a significant downregulation of both total AKT and pAKT as well as decreased cell viability and chemotaxis. Selected protein candidates of the mTOR/AKT signaling pathway demonstrate association with histological and survival parameters of PeCa patients, whereas AKT appears to be the most promising one.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document