Access, barriers, and decisional regret in pursuit of fertility preservation among transgender and gender-diverse individuals

Author(s):  
Nina Vyas ◽  
Christopher R. Douglas ◽  
Christopher Mann ◽  
Amy K. Weimer ◽  
Molly M. Quinn
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (4) ◽  
pp. e26-e27
Author(s):  
Nina Vyas ◽  
Christopher Douglas ◽  
Chris Mann CSW ◽  
Amy K. Weimer ◽  
Molly M. Quinn

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Brandelli Costa ◽  
Heitor Tome da Rosa Filho ◽  
Paola Fagundes Pase ◽  
Anna Martha Vaitses Fontanari ◽  
Ramiro Figueiredo Catelan ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. S395
Author(s):  
A.B. Costa ◽  
A.M. Vaitses Fontanari ◽  
R.F. Catelan ◽  
K. Schwarz ◽  
J.L. Stucky ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 2534-2542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Brandelli Costa ◽  
Anna Martha Vaitses Fontanari ◽  
Ramiro Figueiredo Catelan ◽  
Karine Schwarz ◽  
Juliana Ledur Stucky ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Denise Rivera ◽  
Angela Jukkala ◽  
Katherine Mistretta ◽  
Willa Starke

Little is known about fertility preservation within the TGD community. Few receive adequate counseling placing them at risk for decision regret. The goal of this project was to develop, and pilot test the Transgender Fertility Preservation Knowledge Scale (TFPKS) to support the development and evaluation of health education resources. A community engaged; cross sectional retrospective design was used. Participants (n=189) provided information describing demographics, healthcare decision-making preferences, experiences/knowledge of fertility preservation, and treatment decision regret. The sample included 189 TGD adults. Most were white and aged 26-35 (33.3%) and not offered a consultation (73.0%). Many (41.2%) report they would have participated if offered. Knowledge regarding fertility preservation to support this desire was low. Most participants identified a patient-centered (69.4%) decision making preference. Much remains to address the healthcare inequities within the TGD population regarding fertility preservation. Overall participants had low levels of knowledge to support decision making. Further, healthcare system and individual barriers to fertility preservation remain prevalent. A foundational step towards addressing these disparities, is the identification of a valid and reliable instrument to measure TGD knowledge of fertility preservation.


Author(s):  
Jill C. Fodstad ◽  
Rebecca Elias ◽  
Shivali Sarawgi

Gender diversity refers to gender expressions and/or gender identity experiences that vary from the common experiences of gender. Gender-diverse people may be gender nonconforming, gender nonbinary, gender fluid, gender exploring, transgender, and so forth. Some gender-diverse individuals experience gender dysphoria and/or gender incongruence and may require gender-affirming supports, including gender-affirming medical interventions. The co-occurrence of autism and gender diversity has been highlighted in a series of studies internationally as well as through rich community expressions. Studies in gender-referred individuals reveal high rates of autism traits as well as high rates of existing autism diagnoses. Studies in autistic populations reveal greater gender diversity characteristics. The long-term course of gender diversity in autistic individuals is poorly understood. Clinical guidelines have been developed for adolescents with the co-occurrence, but much work remains: No gender-related measures have been developed and tested for use in neurodiverse populations, no programs exist to support gender-diverse neurodiverse adults, and little is known about co-occurring mental health profiles, risks, or protective factors for people with the co-occurrence. The inclusion of this chapter on co-occurring autism and gender diversity within a book on “co-occurring psychiatric conditions” is problematic, because gender diversity is not a “psychiatric condition,” but instead a form of human diversity. The diagnosis of Gender Dysphoria is useful only insomuch as it allows individuals to obtain necessary gender-related supports. The authors’ choice to include this chapter in this book reflects a compromise, motivated by the need for educating both autism and gender specialists in this common co-occurrence.


Author(s):  
Robert J. Cramer ◽  
Andrea R. Kaniuka ◽  
Farida N. Yada ◽  
Franck Diaz-Garelli ◽  
Ryan M. Hill ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 97 ◽  
pp. 104690
Author(s):  
Athena D.F. Sherman ◽  
Alex McDowell ◽  
Kristen D. Clark ◽  
Monique Balthazar ◽  
Meredith Klepper ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document