Mixed effects of landscape structure, tree diversity and stand’s relative position on insect and pathogen damage in riparian poplar forests

2021 ◽  
Vol 479 ◽  
pp. 118555
Author(s):  
Binli Wang ◽  
Chengming Tian ◽  
Yingmei Liang
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-82
Author(s):  
Cristina Magalhães Silva ◽  
Jader Augusto Costa Pereira ◽  
Júlia Dell Sol Passos Gusmões ◽  
Barbara Emanuelle Penha Mendes ◽  
Halissa Valente ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Cazzolla Gatti ◽  
Simona Castaldi ◽  
Jeremy A. Lindsell ◽  
David A. Coomes ◽  
Marco Marchetti ◽  
...  

Ecosystems ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 740-754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iain M. McNicol ◽  
Casey M. Ryan ◽  
Kyle G. Dexter ◽  
Stephen M. J. Ball ◽  
Mathew Williams

2011 ◽  
Vol 141 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 119-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Fischer ◽  
Andreas Flohre ◽  
Lars W. Clement ◽  
Péter Batáry ◽  
Wolfgang W. Weisser ◽  
...  

Methodology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 95-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen Nestler ◽  
Katharina Geukes ◽  
Mitja D. Back

Abstract. The mixed-effects location scale model is an extension of a multilevel model for longitudinal data. It allows covariates to affect both the within-subject variance and the between-subject variance (i.e., the intercept variance) beyond their influence on the means. Typically, the model is applied to two-level data (e.g., the repeated measurements of persons), although researchers are often faced with three-level data (e.g., the repeated measurements of persons within specific situations). Here, we describe an extension of the two-level mixed-effects location scale model to such three-level data. Furthermore, we show how the suggested model can be estimated with Bayesian software, and we present the results of a small simulation study that was conducted to investigate the statistical properties of the suggested approach. Finally, we illustrate the approach by presenting an example from a psychological study that employed ecological momentary assessment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-156
Author(s):  
Andrew H. Hales ◽  
Kipling D. Williams

Abstract. Ostracism has been shown to increase openness to extreme ideologies and groups. We investigated the consequences of this openness-to-extremity from the perspective of potential ostracizers. Does openness-to-extremity increase one’s prospects of being ostracized by others who are not affiliated with the extreme group? Participants rated willingness to ostracize 40 targets who belong to activist groups that vary in the type of goals/cause they support (prosocial vs. antisocial), and the extremity of their actions (moderate vs. extreme). Mixed-effects modeling showed that people are more willing to ostracize targets whose group engages in extreme actions. This effect was unexpectedly stronger for groups pursuing prosocial causes. It appears openness-to-extremity entails interpersonal cost, and could increase reliance on the extreme group for social connection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document