A two-phase turbulent combustion model and its validation for spray flames

Fuel ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 113 ◽  
pp. 280-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fang Wang ◽  
Bin Hu ◽  
Yong Huang
Keyword(s):  
Turbulent Combustion ◽  
Combustion Model ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Spray Flames ◽  
Turbulent Combustion Model

Simulation of Methanol-Air Two-Phase Flames Using Various Turbulent Combustion Models

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Wang ◽  
Y. Huang ◽  
Y. Z. Wu
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Turbulent Combustion ◽  
Turbulent Jet ◽  
Combustion Model ◽  
Air Flow Rate ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Jet Flame ◽  
Combustion Simulation ◽  
Turbulent Combustion Model ◽  
Turbulent Models

Though fossil fuel is running out, liquid fuels nowadays still provide the most energy used by industrial furnaces, automotive and aero engines. How to predict a two-phase turbulent combustion flame is still a big problem to designers. Generally, the liquid fuel is sprayed and mixed with oxygen, and the flame characteristics depends on the fuel atomization, the fuel droplet spatial distribution, and its interaction with the turbulent oxidizer flow field: turbulent heat, mass and momentum transfer, complicated chemical kinetics, and turbulent-chemistry interaction. Turbulent combustion model is a key point for the two phase combustion simulation. For its short time consuming, Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) method nowadays still is the major tool for gas turbine chamber (GTC) designers, but there is not a universal method in RANS GTC spray combustion simulation at present especially for the two-phase turbulent combustion. The Eddy-Break-Up turbulent combustion model (EBU), Eddy Dissipation Concept turbulent combustion model (EDC), steady Laminar Flame-let turbulent combustion Model (LFM) and the Composition PDF transport turbulent combustion model (CPDF) are all widely used models. In this paper, these four turbulent models are used to simulate a methane-air turbulent jet flame measured by Sandia Lab first, then three methanol-air two-phase turbulent flames, in order to know the ability of these turbulent models. In the gas turbulent jet flame simulation, the result of LFM model and CPDF model are in better agreement with the experimental data than those of the EBU and the EDC models’ results. The reason is that the EBU model and EDC model are overestimated the effect of turbulent. In the three different cases of the two phase combustion simulation, CPDF is the best. The prediction ability of the other three models is different in different cases. The EDC predictions are closer to the experimental data when the air flow rate value is lower, whereas the LFM predictions are better when the air flow rate value is higher.

Assessment of Scale-Resolved Computational Fluid Dynamics Methods for the Investigation of Lean Burn Spray Flames

2016 ◽  
Vol 139 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Puggelli ◽  
Davide Bertini ◽  
Lorenzo Mazzei ◽  
Antonio Andreini
Keyword(s):  
Detailed Comparison ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Combustion Model ◽  
Experimental Investigations ◽  
Lean Burn ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Physical Description ◽  
Spray Flames ◽  
Flamelet Generated Manifold ◽  
Modeling Strategy

Incoming standards on NOx emissions are motivating many aero-engines manufacturers to adopt the lean burn combustion concept. However, several technological issues have to be faced in this transition, among which limited availability of air for cooling purpose and thermoacoustics phenomena. In this scenario, standard numerical design tools are not often capable of characterizing such devices. Thus, considering also the difficulties of experimental investigations in a highly pressurized and reactive environment, unsteady scale-resolved CFD methods are required to correctly understand the combustor performances. In this work, a set of scale-resolved simulations have been carried out on the Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR) generic single-sector combustor spray flame for which measurements both in nonreactive and reactive test conditions are available. Exploiting a two-phase Eulerian–Lagrangian approach combined with a flamelet generated manifold (FGM) combustion model, LES simulations have been performed in order to assess the potential improvements with respect to steady-state solutions. Additional comparisons have also been accomplished with scale-adaptive simulation (SAS) calculations based on eddy dissipation combustion model (EDM). The comparison with experimental results shows that the chosen unsteady strategies lead to a more physical description of reactive processes with respect to Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulations. FGM model showed some limitations in reproducing the partially premixed nature of the flame, whereas SAS–EDM proved to be a robust modeling strategy within an industrial perspective. A new set of spray boundary conditions for liquid injection is also proposed whose reliability is proved through a detailed comparison against experimental data.

scholarly journals Turbulent Combustion Modelling and Experiments: Recent Trends and Developments

2019 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 847-869 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Giusti ◽  
E. Mastorakos
Keyword(s):  
Turbulent Combustion ◽  
Mixture Fraction ◽  
Moment Closure ◽  
Combustion Model ◽  
Complex Geometries ◽  
Conditional Moment ◽  
Practical Applications ◽  
Spray Flames ◽  
Reaction Zones ◽  
Soot Emissions

AbstractThe development of better laser-based experimental methods and the fast rise in computer power has created an unprecedented shift in turbulent combustion research. The range of species and quantities measured and the advent of kHz-level planar diagnostics are now providing great insights in important phenomena and applications such as local and global extinction, pollutants, and spray combustion that were hitherto unavailable. In simulations, the shift to LES allows better representation of the turbulent flow in complex geometries, but despite the fact that the grid size is smaller than in RANS, the push towards realistic conditions and the need to include more detailed chemistry that includes very fast species and thin reaction zones emphasize the necessity of a sub-grid turbulent combustion model. The paper discusses examples from current research with experiments and modelling that focus on flame transients (self-excited oscillations, local extinction), sprays, soot emissions, and on practical applications. These demonstrate how current models are being validated by experimental data and the concerted efforts the community is taking to promote the modelling tools to industry. In addition, the various coordinated International Workshops on non-premixed, premixed, and spray flames, and on soot are discussed and some of their target flames are explored. These comprise flames that are relatively simple to describe from a fluid mechanics perspective but contain difficult-to-model combustion problems such as extinction, pollutants and multi-mode reaction zones. Recently, swirl spray flames, which are more representative of industrial devices, have been added to the target flames. Typically, good agreement is found with LES and some combustion models such as the progress variable - mixture fraction flamelet model, the Conditional Moment Closure, and the Transported PDF method, but predicting soot emissions and the condition of complete extinction in complex geometries is still elusive.

Assessment of Scale Resolved CFD Methods for the Investigation of Lean Burn Spray Flames

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Andreini ◽  
D. Bertini ◽  
L. Mazzei ◽  
S. Puggelli
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Numerical Models ◽  
Combustion Model ◽  
Experimental Investigations ◽  
Strong Impact ◽  
Lean Burn ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Spray Flames ◽  
Flamelet Generated Manifold ◽  
Reactive Processes

Incoming standards on NOx emissions are motivating many aero-engines manufacturers to adopt the lean burn combustion concept. However, several technological issues have to be faced in this transition, among which limited availability of air for cooling purpose and thermoacoustics phenomena that should be managed to safely implement this burning mode. In this scenario, standard numerical design tools are not often capable of characterizing such devices. Thus, considering also the difficulties of experimental investigations in a highly pressurized and reactive environment, unsteady scale resolved CFD methods are required to correctly understand the combustor performances. In the last years Large Eddy (LES) and hybrid RANS-LES models such as Scale Adaptive Simulations (SAS) have undergone considerable developments. Such approaches have been already applied for gaseous flames, leading to a strong enhancement in phenomena prediction with respect to standard steady-state simulations. However, huge research efforts are still required when spray flames are considered, since all the numerical models chosen to describe spray dynamics and the related reactive processes can have a strong impact on the accuracy of the whole simulation. In this work a set of scale resolved simulations have been carried out on the DLR Generic Single Sector Combustor spray flame for which measurements both in non-reactive and reactive test conditions are available. Exploiting a two-phase Eulerian-Lagrangian approach combined with a Flamelet Generated Manifold (FGM) combustion model, LES simulations have been performed in order to assess the potential improvements with respect to steady state solutions. Additional comparisons have also been accomplished with SAS calculations based on Eddy Dissipation combustion model (EDM). The comparison with experimental results shows that the chosen unsteady strategies lead to a more physical description of reactive processes with respect to RANS simulations. FGM model showed some limitations in reproducing the partially-premixed nature of the flame, whereas SAS-EDM proved to be a robust modelling strategy within an industrial perspective. A new set of spray boundary conditions for liquid injection is also proposed whose realiability is proved through a detailed comparison against experimental data.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document