Heavy metals distribution characteristics of FGD gypsum samples from Shanxi province 12 coal-fired power plants and its potential environmental impacts

Fuel ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 209 ◽  
pp. 238-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Hao ◽  
Qiu Li ◽  
Yun Pan ◽  
Zixing Liu ◽  
Simiao Wu ◽  
...  
Fuel ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 251 ◽  
pp. 593-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biao Fu ◽  
Guijian Liu ◽  
Md. Manik Mian ◽  
Mei Sun ◽  
Dun Wu

2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 2123-2130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Zhang ◽  
Jing Hai ◽  
Mingzhong Ren ◽  
Sukun Zhang ◽  
Jiang Cheng ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 545-548
Author(s):  
Hong-Min WANG ◽  
Shu-Guang WANG ◽  
Xian-Hong ZHANG ◽  
Chi HAO

2013 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 311-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madawala Liyanage Duminda Jayaranjan ◽  
Ajit P. Annachhatre

Investigations were undertaken to utilize flue gas desulfurization (FGD) gypsum for the treatment of leachate from the coal ash (CA) dump sites. Bench-scale investigations consisted of three main steps namely hydrogen sulfide (H2S) production by sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) using sulfate from solubilized FGD gypsum as the electron acceptor, followed by leaching of heavy metals (HMs) from coal bottom ash (CBA) and subsequent precipitation of HMs using biologically produced sulfide. Leaching tests of CBA carried out at acidic pH revealed the existence of several HMs such as Cd, Cr, Hg, Pb, Mn, Cu, Ni and Zn. Molasses was used as the electron donor for the biological sulfate reduction (BSR) process which produced sulfide rich effluent with concentration up to 150 mg/L. Sulfide rich effluent from the sulfate reduction process was used to precipitate HMs as metal sulfides from CBA leachate. HM removal in the range from 40 to 100% was obtained through sulfide precipitation.


2017 ◽  
Vol 113 (11/12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Justine Rudman ◽  
Paul Gauché ◽  
Karen J. Esler

According to recent national energy plans and policy documents, the number of renewable energy developments is expected to increase in South Africa, thus contributing to the diversification of the country’s energy system. Consequently, numerous solar power developments are being deployed in the sunny arid interior – areas generally represented by the Nama-Karoo and Savanna Biomes. These developments come with a range of novel environmental impacts, providing opportunities for multidimensional exploratory research. Here, a mixed-method approach was used to identify and investigate possible environmental impacts associated with two types of solar power plants: concentrating solar power and photovoltaic. Structured interviews conducted with experts and experienced professionals, together with observations from site visits generated complementary findings. In addition to the risk of cumulative ecological impacts associated with individual solar plant developments, landscape impacts of multiple power plants and the direct impact on avifauna were found to be the most significant environmental impacts. These direct impacts appear to be most significant during the construction stage, which represents an intensive 10% of the total power plant lifespan. This investigation provides an early, broad and informative perspective on the experienced and expected impacts of solar power in South African arid regions as well as insights to possible future research areas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document