Abstract
Background: Energy cost minimization has been widely accepted to regulate gait. Optimization principles have been frequently used to explain how individuals adapt their gait pattern. However, there have been rare attempts to account for the role of variability in this optimization process. Motor redundancy can enable individuals to perform tasks reliably while achieving energy optimization. However, we do not know how the goal-irrelevant and goal-relevant variability is regulated.. In this study, we investigated how unilateral transfemoral amputees regulate step and stride variability based on the task to achieve energy economy. Methods: Nine individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation walked on a treadmill at speeds of 0.6,0.8,1.0,1.2 and 1.4 m/s using their prescribed passive prostheses. We calculated the step-to-step and stride-to-stride variability and applied goal equivalent manifold (GEM) based control to decompose goal-relevant and goal-irrelevant manifold. To quantify the energy economy, the energy recovery rate (R) was calculated based on potential energy and kinetic energy. Comparisons were made between GEM variabilities and commonly used standard deviation measurements. A linear regression model was used to investigate the trade-off between R and GEM variabilities. Results: Our analysis shows greater variability along the goal-relevant manifold compared to the goal-irrelevant manifold (p<.001). Moreover, our analysis shows lower energy recovery rate for amputee gait compared to nonamputee gait (at least 20% less at faster walking speed). We found a negative relationship between energy recovery rate and goal-irrelevant variability. Compared to the standard deviation measurements, the variability decomposed using GEM reflected the preferred walking speed and the limitation of the passive prosthetic device.Conclusion: Individuals with amputation cleverly leverage task redundancy, regulating step and stride variability to the goal equivalent manifold (GEM). This result suggests that task redundancy enables unilateral amputees to benefit from motor variability in terms of energy economy. The differences observed between prosthetic step and intact step support the development of prosthetic leg capable of enhancing positive work during the double support phase and of powered prosthesis controllers that allow for variability along the task space while minimizing variability that interferes with the task goal. This study provides a different perspective on amputee gait analysis and challenge the field to think differently about the role of variability.
Is there a Trade-off between Economy and Task Goal Variability in Transfemoral Amputee Gait?
