Evaluating the Contribution of Reactive Balance to Prediction of Fall Rates Cross-Sectionally and Longitudinally in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis

Author(s):  
Charles Van Liew ◽  
Jessie M. Huisinga ◽  
Daniel S. Peterson
2021 ◽  
pp. 105511
Author(s):  
Mohamed Suhair Bin Mohamed Suhaimy ◽  
Stephen R. Lord ◽  
Phu D. Hoang ◽  
Alex Nieto ◽  
Daina Sturnieks ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 675-685
Author(s):  
Mohamed Suhair Bin Mohamed Suhaimy ◽  
Yoshiro Okubo ◽  
Phu D. Hoang ◽  
Stephen R. Lord

Aim. To compare reactive balance in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) with healthy controls and to examine the ability of people with MS to adapt their reactive balance and retain training effects. Data Sources. Electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, PsychINFO) and reference lists of included articles from inception to February 25, 2019. Study Selection. Case-control and intervention studies that assessed reactive balance using mechanical perturbations in people with a confirmed diagnosis of MS. Results. Meta-analyses of 9 studies (n = 342) showed that people with MS have significantly worse reactive balance than healthy controls (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.78, 95% CI 0.44-1.11, P < .0001, I2 = 47%). Specifically, people with MS have greater center of mass displacements (SMD 0.41, 95% CI 0.05-0.77, P = .02, I2 = 9%) and longer response times (MD (ms) 31.45, 95% CI 19.91-42.98, P < .0001, I2 = 75%) in response to standing perturbations than healthy controls. Subsequent meta-analyses revealed training comprising repeated exposure to perturbations improved response times ( P < .001) and training effects on response times could be retained for 24 hours ( P < .001) in people with MS. Conclusions. Reactive balance assessments can highlight functional impairments related to falls in people with MS, and perturbation training can acutely improve reactive balance control and such improvements can be retained for 24 hours in this population. Systematic review registration number: CRD42019126130.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shani Batcir ◽  
Omri Lubovsky ◽  
Yaacov G. Bachner ◽  
Itshak Melzer

Background: Falls are the leading cause of fatal and non-fatal injuries among older adults. Perturbation-Based-Balance Training (PBBT) is a promising approach to reduce fall rates by improving reactive balance responses. PBBT programs are designed for older adults who are able to stand and walk on a motorized treadmill independently. However, frail older adults, whose fall rates are higher, may not have this ability and they cannot participate. Thus, there is a critical need for innovative perturbation exercise programs to improve reactive balance and reduce the fall risks among older adults in a wider range of functioning. Trunk and arms are highly involved in reactive balance reactions. We aim to investigate whether an alternative PBBT program that provides perturbations during hands-free bicycling in a sitting position, geared to improve trunk and arm reactive responses, can be transferred to reduce fall risks and improve balance function among pre-frail older adults.Methods: In a single-blinded randomized-controlled trial, 68 community-dwelling pre-frail older adults are randomly allocated into two intervention groups. The experimental group receives 24-PBBT sessions over 12-weeks that include self-induced internal and machine-induced external unannounced perturbations of balance during hands-free pedaling on a bicycle-simulator system, in combination with cognitive dual-tasks. The control group receives 24 pedaling sessions over 12-weeks by the same bicycle-simulator system under the same cognitive dual-tasks, but without balance perturbations. Participants' reactive and proactive balance functions and gait function are assessed before and after the 12-week intervention period (e.g., balance reactive responses and strategies, voluntary step execution test, postural stability in upright standing, Berg Balance Test, Six-meter walk test, as well as late life function and fear of falling questionnaires).Discussion: This research addresses two key issues in relation to balance re-training: (1) generalization of balance skills acquired through exposure to postural perturbations in a sitting position investigating the ability of pre-frail older adults to improve reactive and proactive balance responses in standing and walking, and (2) the individualization of perturbation training to older adults' neuromotor capacities in order to optimize training responses and their applicability to real-life challenges.Clinical Trial Registration:www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03636672 / BARZI0104; Registered: July 22, 2018; Enrolment of the first participant March: 1, 2019. See Supplementary File.


1996 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Li ◽  
M. L. Cuzner ◽  
J. Newcombe
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document