scholarly journals Use of the ACES (Appearance, Classification, Enhanced endoscopy, and Safe resection) algorithm for the recognition and management of malignant polyps—a letter in response to the Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer recommendations

2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (5) ◽  
pp. 1194-1198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy Soetikno ◽  
Han Mo Chiu ◽  
Ravishankar Asokkumar ◽  
Silvia Sanduleanu ◽  
Shinji Tanaka ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 605-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathy L Melvin ◽  
Anissa I Vines ◽  
Allison M Deal ◽  
Holly O Pierce ◽  
William R Carpenter ◽  
...  

Abstract Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers in the USA. In 2017, an estimated 135,420 people were diagnosed with CRC and 50,260 people died from CRC. Several screening modalities are recommended by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), including annual stool tests that are usually completed at home and under-used compared with colonoscopy despite stated patient preferences for an alternative to colonoscopy. The Community Preventive Services Task Force recommends use of small media interventions (SMIs) to increase CRC screening and calls for a greater understanding of its independent impact on screening participation. This study tested whether a SMI increased the likelihood of participant return of a USPSTF recommended Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT). In total, 804 individuals participated in a two-group, prospective randomized controlled trial. Descriptive statistics with chi-square tests compared differences in participant characteristics and return rates. Multivariable log-binomial modeling estimated combined effects of patient characteristics with FIT return rates. No differences in return rates were observed overall or by participant characteristics other than the year of enrollment. A multivariable model controlling for all covariates, found gender, insurance type, and regular place for healthcare to be significantly associated with return rates. Receipt of the SMI did not independently increase overall return rates but it may have improved the ease of completing the FIT by some participants, particularly women, those with insurance, and those with a regular place for healthcare.


2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 224-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Desmond Leddin ◽  
Robert Enns ◽  
Robert Hilsden ◽  
Carlo A Fallone ◽  
Linda Rabeneck ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Differences between American (United States [US]) and European guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance may create confusion for the practicing clinician. Under- or overutilization of surveillance colonoscopy can impact patient care.METHODS: The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG) convened a working group (CAG-WG) to review available guidelines and provide unified guidance to Canadian clinicians regarding appropriate follow-up for colorectal cancer (CRC) surveillance after index colonoscopy. A literature search was conducted for relevant data that postdated the published guidelines.RESULTS: The CAG-WG chose the 2012 US Multi-Society Task Force (MSTF) on Colorectal Cancer to serve as the basis for the Canadian position, primarily because the US approach was the simplest and comprehensively addressed the issue of serrated polyps. Aspects of other guidelines were incorporated where relevant. The CAG-WG recommendations differed from the US MSTF guidelines in three main areas: patients with negative index colonoscopy should be followed-up at 10 years using any of the appropriate screening tests, including colonos-copy, for average-risk individuals; among patients with >10 adenomas, a one-year interval for subsequent colonoscopy is recommended; and for long-term follow-up, patients with low-risk adenomas on both the index and first follow-up procedures can undergo second follow-up colonos-copy at an interval of five to 10 years.DISCUSSION: The CAG-WG adapted the US MSTF guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance to the Canadian health care environment with a few modifications. It is anticipated that the present article will provide unified guidance that will enhance physician acceptance and encourage appropriate utilization of recommended surveillance intervals.


2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 486-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tonya Kaltenbach ◽  
Joseph C. Anderson ◽  
Carol A. Burke ◽  
Jason A. Dominitz ◽  
Samir Gupta ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 463-485.e5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samir Gupta ◽  
David Lieberman ◽  
Joseph C. Anderson ◽  
Carol A. Burke ◽  
Jason A. Dominitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 92 (5) ◽  
pp. 997-1015.e1
Author(s):  
Aasma Shaukat ◽  
Tonya Kaltenbach ◽  
Jason A. Dominitz ◽  
Douglas J. Robertson ◽  
Joseph C. Anderson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document