scholarly journals High-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia from a Homozygous NLRP7 Mutation

2021 ◽  
pp. 100803
Author(s):  
Zachary A. Kopelman ◽  
Erica R. Hope
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paramjeet Kaur ◽  
Ashok K. Chauhan ◽  
Anil Khurana ◽  
Yashpal Verma ◽  
Nupur Bansal

Background: Gestational trophoblastic disease is a spectrum of cellular proliferation arising from the placental villous trophoblast. Gestational triphoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is a collective term for GTD that invade locally or metastasize. GTD includes hydatidiform mole (complete and partial) and GTN include invasive mole, choricocarcinoma, placental site trophoblastic tumor and epitheliod trophoblastic tumor. Aim: To evaluate clinicopathological profile, treatment pattern and clinical outcome in patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). Materials and Methods: Twelve cases of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia treated between 2012 to November 2015 in deptt of Radiotherapy – II, PGIMS, Rohtak were evaluated in this retrospective study. Data was analyzed on the basis of age, histopathology, stage, type of treatment received and treatment related toxicities. Disease free survival was estimated. Results: Out of 12 women 7 (58 %) had hydatidiform mole, 4 (33%) invasive mole and 01 (8%) had choriocarcinoma. All the cases were given chemotherapy. Two patients had low risk disease. Among high risk group seven patients had score of less than 7 and five patients had risk score of 7 or higher. Five patients were given single agent methotrexate, seven patients received multidrug regimens. All patients are on regular follow up. One patient (high risk group) expired as she did not receive treatment. Conclusion: GTN are rare and proliferative disorders with proper diagnosis and treatment most of the cases are amenable to treatment with favorable outcome.


2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 357-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.-G. Lu ◽  
F. Ye ◽  
Y.-M. Shen ◽  
Y.-F. Fu ◽  
H.-Z. Chen ◽  
...  

This study was designed to analyze the outcomes of chemotherapy for high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) with EMA-CO regimen as primary and secondary protocol in China. Fifty-four patients with high-risk GTN received 292 EMA/CO treatment cycles between 1996 and 2005. Forty-five patients were primarily treated with EMA-CO, and nine were secondarily treated after failure to other combination chemotherapy. Adjuvant surgery and radiotherapy were used in the selected patients. Response, survival and related risk factors, as well as chemotherapy complications, were retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-five of forty-five patients (77.8%) receiving EMA-CO as first-line treatment achieved complete remission, and 77.8% (7/9) as secondary treatment. The overall survival rate was 87.0% in all high-risk GTN patients, with 93.3% (42/45) as primary therapy and 55.6% (5/9) as secondary therapy. The survival rates were significantly different between two groups (χ2= 6.434, P = 0.011). Univariate analysis showed that the metastatic site and the number of metastatic organs were significant risk factors, but binomial distribution logistic regression analysis revealed that only the number of metastatic organs was an independent risk factor for the survival rate. No life-threatening toxicity and secondary malignancy were found. EMA-EP regimen was used for ten patients who were resistant to EMA-CO and three who relapsed after EMA-CO. Of those, 11 patients (84.6%) achieved complete remission. We conclude that EMA-CO regimen is an effective and safe primary therapy for high-risk GTN, but not an appropriate second-line protocol. The number of metastatic organs is an independent prognostic factor for the patient with high-risk GTN. EMA-EP regimen is a highly effective salvage therapy for those failing to EMA-CO.


2014 ◽  
Vol 50 (12) ◽  
pp. 2082-2089 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Even ◽  
P. Pautier ◽  
P. Duvillard ◽  
A. Floquet ◽  
P. Kerbrat ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 123 (2) ◽  
pp. 449
Author(s):  
B. Davidson ◽  
C. Nagel ◽  
M. King ◽  
T. Skorpinski ◽  
S. Kehoe ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minke M Frijstein ◽  
Christianne A R Lok ◽  
John Coulter ◽  
Nienke E van Trommel ◽  
Marianne J ten Kate – Booij ◽  
...  

ObjectivesBecause gestational trophoblastic disease is rare, little evidence is available from randomized controlled trials on optimal treatment and follow-up. Treatment protocols vary within Europe, and even between different centers within countries. One of the goals of the European Organization for Treatment of Trophoblastic Diseases (EOTTD) is to harmonize treatment in Europe. To provide a basis for international standardization of definitions, treatment and follow-up protocols in gestational trophoblastic disease, we evaluated differences and similarities between protocols in EOTTD countries.MethodsMembers from each EOTTD country were asked to complete an online structured questionnaire comprising multiple-choice and multiple-answer questions. The following themes were discussed: incidence of gestational trophoblastic disease and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia, definitions, guidelines, classification system, treatment, recurrence, and follow-up.ResultsForty-four respondents from 17 countries participated in this study. Guidelines were present in 80% of the countries and the FIGO (Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique) staging and risk classification was often used to estimate risks. Agreement about when to start chemotherapy for post-molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia was present among 66% of the respondents. Preferred first-line treatments in low- and high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia were methotrexate (81%) and EMA-CO (etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D, cyclophosphamide, vincristine) (93%), respectively. The definition of human chorionic gonadotropin normalization after hydatidiform mole evacuation was two consecutive normal values for nine countries. The FIGO definition of post-molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia based on human chorionic gonadotropin plateau or rise was agreed on by 69% of respondents, and only 69% and 74% defined low-risk and high-risk disease, respectively, using FIGO criteria. There were major differences in definitions of recurrence, chemotherapy resistance and follow-up protocols among countries, despite EOTTD consensus statements.ConclusionsThis questionnaire provides a good overview of current clinical practices in different countries. Based on the survey results, it is clear that there are several gestationaltrophoblastic disease-related topics that need urgent attention within the EOTTD community to create more uniformity and to aid the development of uniform guidelines in Europe.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document