scholarly journals Effect of infill wall on the ductility and behavior of high strength reinforced concrete frames

HBRC Journal ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Sayed Ahmed Tawfik Essa ◽  
Mohamed Ragai Kotp Badr ◽  
Ashraf Hasan El-Zanaty
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Onofre Rigão ◽  
Carlos Eduardo de Souza ◽  
João Kaminski Junior

2015 ◽  
Vol 789-790 ◽  
pp. 1140-1144
Author(s):  
Fatih Bahadir ◽  
Fatih Süleyman Balik

This study used test frames were purposely detailed and constructed with observed deficiencies in investigated dormitory buildings of Turkey. In this study, four reinforced concrete frames were produced two storeys, one bay and 3D in 1/6 geometric scale was tested. Since the studied frame was the external frame of the structure, brick infill wall with a window opening was also included. The first specimen was the reference specimen and contained no strengthening and no brick wall. The second specimen was contained brick wall. The third specimen was strengthened with internal steel panel. Finally fourth specimen’s was strengthened with infilled RC shear wall. The test specimens were subjected to reversed cyclic quasi-static lateral loading. Strength of the test specimens were measured and compared. Test results indicated that the strengthened specimens displayed significantly higher lateral strength than the reference specimen considerably.


HBRC Journal ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Sayed Tawfik ◽  
Mohamed Ragaee Badr ◽  
Ashraf ElZanaty

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 2397-2415
Author(s):  
Muhammad Umar ◽  
Syed Azmat Ali Shah ◽  
Khan Shahzada ◽  
Muhammad Tayyab Naqash ◽  
Wajid Ali

Infill walls increase the strength and stiffness of the reinforced concrete frames, but they usually are not considering in design. However, when the infills are considered in the design, the opening for doors/windows necessitates investigation as well. This research work aims to investigate the effect of perforations (openings) in the infill walls on the performance of infilled RC frames, in other words, this research investigates the number of infill walls in infilled RC frames. Based on the current construction practices in Pakistan, two full scales perforated infilled RC frames were constructed in the laboratory. One infilled RC frame has an eccentric door and window (specimen-1) while the other has only window at its centre (specimen-2). Both the specimens were tested against reverse cyclic loading (quasi-static test). From the experimental testing, it was found that infilled RC frame having less amount of opening in infill wall has more resistance to lateral loads, have more stiffness and dissipated higher energy as compared to infilled RC frame having a significant size of the opening in infill wall. Similarly, displacement ductility (µD) and Response modification factor (R) also depend on the quantity of opening in infill wall in infilled RC frame. Doi: 10.28991/cej-2020-03091625 Full Text: PDF


2020 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 92-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.V. FEDOROVA ◽  
◽  
FAN DINH GUOK ◽  
NGUYEN THI CHANG ◽  
◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Seung-Jae Lee ◽  
Tae-Sung Eom ◽  
Eunjong Yu

AbstractThis study analytically investigated the behavior of reinforced concrete frames with masonry infills. For the analysis, VecTor2, a nonlinear finite element analysis program that implements the Modified Compression Field Theory and Disturbed Stress Field Model, was used. To account for the slip behavior at the mortar joints in the masonry element, the hyperbolic Mohr–Coulomb yield criterion, defined as a function of cohesion and friction angle, was used. The analysis results showed that the lateral resistance and failure mode of the infilled frames were significantly affected by the thickness of the masonry infill, cohesion on the mortar joint–brick interface, and poor mortar filling (or gap) on the masonry boundary under the beam. Diagonal strut actions developed along two or three load paths on the mortar infill, including the backstay actions near the tension column and push-down actions near the compression columns. Such backstay and push-down actions increased the axial and shear forces of columns, and ultimately affect the strength, ductility, and failure mode of the infilled frames.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document