Patients with Fulminant Myocarditis Supported with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Short-Term Mortality and Impact of Risk Factors

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. S418
Author(s):  
J.K. Vishram-Nielsen ◽  
F. Billia ◽  
F. Foroutan ◽  
T.A. Buchan ◽  
J. Alvarez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Fulminant Myocarditis ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Short Term Mortality

scholarly journals Comparison of Prognostic Accuracy of the quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment between Short- & Long-term Mortality in Patients Presenting Outside of The Intensive Care Unit - A Systematic Review & Meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
TOH LEONG TAN ◽  
Ying Jing Tang ◽  
Ling Jing Ching ◽  
Noraidatulakma Abdullah ◽  
Hui-min Neoh
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Suspected Infection ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Short Term Mortality ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Qsofa Score ◽  
Long Term Mortality

Objective: In year 2016, quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) was introduced as a better sepsis screening tool compared to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the ability of the qSOFA in predicting short- and long-term mortality among patients outside the intensive care unit setting. Method: Studies reporting on the qSOFA and mortality from MEDLINE (published between 1946 and 15th December 2017) and SCOPUS (published before 15th December 2017). Hand-checking of the references of relevant articles was carried out. Studies were included if they involved inclusion of patients presenting to the ED; usage of Sepsis-3 definition with suspected infection; usage of qSOFA score for mortality prognostication; and written in English. Study details, patient demographics, qSOFA scores, short-term (<30 days) and long-term (≥30 days) mortality were extracted. Two reviewers conducted all reviews and data extraction independently. Results and Discussion: A total of 39 studies met the selection criteria for full text review and only 36 studies were inclided. Data on qSOFA scores and mortality rate were extracted from 36 studies from 15 countries. The pooled odds ratio was 5.5 and 4.7 for short-term and long-term mortality respectively. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity for the qSOFA was 48% and 85% for short-term mortality and 32% and 92% for long-term mortality, respectively. Studies reporting on short-term mortality were heterogeneous (Tau=24%, I2=94%, P<0.001), while long-term mortality studies were homogenous (Tau=0%, I2<0.001, P=0.52). The factors contributing to heterogeneity may be wide age group, various clinical settings, variation in the timing of qSOFA scoring, and broad range of clinical diagnosis and criteria. There was no publication bias for short-term mortality analysis. Conclusion: qSOFA score showed a poor sensitivity but moderate specificity for both short and long-term mortality prediction in patients with suspected infection. qSOFA score may be a cost-effective tool for sepsis prognostication outside of the ICU setting.

Abstract P411: Prevalence, Characteristics and Outcomes of Undetermined Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Konark MALHOTRA ◽  
Christina Zompola ◽  
Aikaterini Theodorou ◽  
Aristeidis Katsanos ◽  
Ashkan Shoamanesh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Amyloid Angiopathy ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Pooled Prevalence ◽  
Subgroup Analyses ◽  
Short Term Mortality ◽  
Cerebral Amyloid ◽  
Undetermined Etiology

Objective: We sought to determine the prevalence, radiological characteristics, and clinical outcomes of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) of undetermined etiology. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies involving patients with spontaneous ICH was conducted to assess the prevalence and clinical-radiological characteristics of undetermined ICH. Additionally, we assessed the rates for ICH secondary to hypertensive arteriopathy (HTN-A) and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). Subgroup analyses were performed based on the use of a) etiology-oriented ICH classification, b) detailed neuroimaging, and c) Boston criteria among CAA-ICH. Results: 24 studies were included (n=15,828; mean age: 64.8 years, males: 60.8%). The pooled prevalence of HTN-A ICH, undetermined ICH and CAA-ICH were 50% (95%CI: 43-58%), 18% (95%CI: 13-23%), and 12% (95%CI: 7-17%; p<0.001 between subgroups). The volume of ICH was largest in CAA-ICH 24.7mL (95%CI: 19.7-29.8mL), followed by HTN-A ICH 16.2mL (95%CI: 10.9-21.5mL) and undetermined ICH 15.4mL (95%CI: 6.2-24.5mL). Among patients with undetermined ICH, the rates of short-term mortality and intraventricular hemorrhage were 33% (95%CI: 25-42%) and 38% (95%CI: 28-48%), respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a higher rate of undetermined ICH among studies that did not use an etiology-oriented classification (22%; 95%CI: 15-29%). No difference was observed between studies based on the completion of detailed neuroimaging to assess the rates of undetermined ICH (p=0.62). Conclusions: The etiology of spontaneous ICH remains undetermined among one in five patients in studies using etiology-oriented classification and among one in four patients in studies that avoid using etiology-oriented classification. The short-term mortality in undetermined ICH is high despite the relatively small ICH volume. Our findings suggest the use of etiology-oriented classification to approach ICH patients (Figure).

scholarly journals Optimal duration of prone positioning in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-regression analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. e021408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsuro Kamo ◽  
Yoshitaka Aoki ◽  
Tatsuma Fukuda ◽  
Kiyoyasu Kurahashi ◽  
Hideto Yasuda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Distress Syndrome ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Prone Positioning ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Optimal Duration ◽  
Short Term Mortality ◽  
Meta Regression ◽  
Meta Regression Analysis

IntroductionSeveral systematic reviews and meta-analyses have demonstrated that prolonged (≥16 hours) prone positioning can reduce the mortality associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, the effectiveness and optimal duration of prone positioning was not fully evaluated. To fill these gaps, we will first investigate the effectiveness of prone positioning compared with the conventional management of patients with ARDS, regarding outcomes using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Second, if statistical heterogeneity in effectiveness with regard to short-term mortality (intensive care unit death or ≤30-day mortality) is shown, we will conduct a meta-regression analysis to explore the association between duration and effectiveness, and determine the optimal duration of prone positioning.Method and analysisRelevant studies are collected using PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the WHO International Clinical Trials Platform Search Portal. Randomised controlled trials comparing prone and supine positioning in adults with ARDS will be included in the meta-analysis. Two independent investigators will screen trials obtained by search eligibility and extract data from selected studies to standardised data recording forms. For each selected trial, the risk of bias and quality of evidence will be evaluated using the GRADE system. Meta-regression analyses will be performed to identify the most important factors associated with short-term mortality, and subgroup analysis will be used to analyse the following: duration of mechanical ventilation in the prone position per day, patient severity, tidal volume and cause of ARDS. If heterogeneity or inconsistency among the studies is detected, subgroup analysis will be conducted on factors that may cause heterogeneity.Ethics and disseminationThis study requires no ethical approval. The results obtained from this systematic review and meta-analysis will be disseminated through international conference presentations and publication in a peer-reviewed journal.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42017078340.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document