Hospital Length of Stay in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background: High Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) is increasingly being performed with the availability of hemodynamic support. The aim of this study was to determine the predictors of length of stay (LOS) for high risk PCI in US. Methods: We explored the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project’s Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) using the ICD9 procedure code of 36.07 and 36.06 for PCI. NIS is largest all-payer dataset that represents 20% of all US hospitals. We included patients who had PCI from 2005 through 2010 who also underwent Percutaneous Circulatory Assist Device (PCAD) or Intra-aortic Balloon Pump (IABP) placement during the same hospital admission. Severity of comorbidities was defined by Deyo modification of Charlson’s Comorbidity Index (CCI). Hospitals were identified by a unique hospital identification number and hospital volume was determined by calculating the total number of PCI performed by an institution on year to year basis. Complications were based on Patient Safety Indicators (PSI) recognized by Agency for Health Care Research and Quality to monitor in hospital complications. We examined the predictors of LOS by a mixed effects linear regression model including patient demographics, admission characteristics, CCI quartiles with first quartile as a reference, hospital PCI volume quartiles, IABP or PCAD use and periprocedural complications. Hospital ID was incorporated as random effects in the model. Results: A total of 26,300 High Risk PCIs (weighted n = 130,151) were available for analysis. Factors associated with increased LOS were the use of IABP as compared to PCAD (+0.86 days, p=0.03), occurrence of any complication (+4.67 days, P < 0.001), high CCI (+2.5 days for CCI=2 and +4.1 days for CCI≥3, p<0.001 for both), teaching hospital (+0.96 days, p <0.001), presence of myocardial infarction (MI) or shock (+0.55 days, p = 0.002) and highest quartile of hospital PCI volume (+0.86 days, p<0.001). Factors associated with decreased LOS included private insurance (-0.9 days, p < 0.001) and self-pay or no insurance (-0.89 days, p<0.001). Conclusion: In our observational study based on a large database, use of IABP as compared to PCAD, occurrence of complications, CCI, teaching hospital, presence of MI or shock and high PCI volume were associated with increased LOS & having private insurance and self pay or no insurance was associated with decreased LOS.

Download Full-text

Abstract 317: Costs and Benefits Associated with Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in China

Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes ◽

10.1161/circoutcomes.8.suppl_2.317 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 8 (suppl_2) ◽

Author(s):

Chen Jin ◽

Xin-ran Tang ◽

Qiu-ting Dong ◽

Wei Li ◽

Wei Zhao ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Myocardial Infarction ◽

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Cost Saving ◽

Coronary Intervention ◽

Observational Research ◽

Bleeding Complications ◽

Costs And Benefits ◽

Hospital Outcomes ◽

Percutaneous Coronary

Background: Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (TRI) has been increasingly used in the treatment of ischemic heart disease. While there are few studies examining the costs and benefits of transradial vs. transfemoral (TFI) in experienced centers among highly selected patients, treatment patterns and cost data obtained from the United States and European countries might not be generalizable to the developing world. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing PCI in the largest heart center in China between January and December 2010. Propensity score inverse probability weighting (IPW) method was used to compare costs and in-hospital outcomes between TRI and TFI, while controlling for potential treatment selection inherent in observational research. Results: Of 5,307patients undergoing PCI, 4,684 (88.3%) received TRI. Those undergoing TRI were younger, were less likely to be female, less likely to have prior myocardial infarction, PCI, or CABG, and more often presented with STEMI. After IPW adjustment, TRI was associated with fewer bleeding complications (BARC≥3 0.7% vs. 2.2%, OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.18-0.68), major adverse cardiovascular event (a composite of death, myocardial infarction, BARC bleeding≥3 or unplanned revascularization; 1.8% vs. 4.0%, OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.31-0.79), and shorter length of stay (6.1 vs 8.3 days, adjusted difference -1.5 days, 95% CI -1.9 to -1.2; Table ). TRI was associated with a cost saving of $1,261 (95% CI $967-$1,557) as compared with TFI. The cost saving was mainly driven by reduced procedural-related cost ($761) from differential use of vascular closure device and lower hospitalization cost ($217) related to shorter length of stay. Similar results were found in clinically relevant groups of myocardial infarction (STEMI and NSTEMI), acute coronary syndrome (STEMI, NSTEMI, and unstable angina), and stable angina. Conclusions: Compared with the TFI approach, TRI was associated with fewer complications, shorter length of stay, lower costs, and improved in-hospital outcomes.

Download Full-text

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention–Related Bleeding Risk Factors in Current Practice

Annals of Pharmacotherapy ◽

10.1345/aph.1g057 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 39 (10) ◽

pp. 1627-1633 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

A Scott Mathis ◽

James J Gugger

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽

Renal Function ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Bleeding Risk ◽

Coronary Intervention ◽

Bleeding Complications ◽

Minor Bleeding ◽

Prolonged Length ◽

Percutaneous Coronary

BACKGROUND: Bleeding is a common and costly complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Little is known about the risk factors for bleeding complications. Objective: To report our PCI-related observations from a single institution and use the information to establish risk factors for short-term bleeding complications, with special focus on examining the importance of renal function. METHODS: A retrospective record review was conducted of the admission of 300 patients grouped according to antithrombotic regimen: unfractionated heparin alone (n = 187), bivalirudin (n = 26), and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist plus heparin (n = 103). Bleeding and ischemic outcomes were tracked. A model was constructed to predict independent bleeding risk factors. RESULTS: Treatment groups differed significantly regarding any bleeding (p = 0.001), minor bleeding (p < 0.001), and length of stay (p = 0.01). Multivariate predictors of any bleeding included antithrombotic regimen, creatinine clearance (Clcr) <30 mL/min, and hypertension. Any bleeding was associated with prolonged length of stay. Major bleeding was predicted by Clcr <30 mL/min and was associated with prolonged length of stay and death. Minor bleeding was predicted only by choice of antithrombotic regimen. CONCLUSIONS: The major influences on bleeding risk appeared to be Clcr <30 mL/min and choice of antithrombotic regimen. It is important to note that other markers of renal function, including serum creatinine value and serum creatinine at a cutoff level of 1.5 mg/dL, did not predict bleeding events.

Download Full-text

Editor’s Choice- What do small serum creatinine changes tell us about outcomes after acute myocardial infarction?

European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care ◽

10.1177/2048872617728721 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 7 (8) ◽

pp. 739-742 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Johann Auer ◽

Frederik H Verbrugge ◽

Gudrun Lamm

Keyword(s):

Myocardial Infarction ◽

Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽

Acute Kidney Injury ◽

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽

Serum Creatinine ◽

Kidney Injury ◽

Coronary Intervention ◽

Adverse Outcomes ◽

Hospital Length Of Stay ◽

Percutaneous Coronary

Acute kidney injury (AKI), mostly defined as a rise in serum creatinine concentration of more than 0.5 mg/dl, is a common, serious, and potentially preventable complication of percutaneous coronary intervention and is associated with adverse outcomes including an increased risk of inhospital mortality. Recent data from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry/Cath-PCI registry including 985,737 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention suggest that approximately 7% experienced AKI with a reported incidence of 3–19%. In patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), AKI occurs more frequently with rates up to 20% depending on patient and procedural characteristics. However, varying definitions of AKI limit comparisons of AKI rates across different studies. Recently, most studies have adopted the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria for definition and classification of AKI. Beyond the AKIN criteria for AKI, other classifications such as the risk, injury, failure, loss and end-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) and kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) criteria are used to define AKI. Notably, even small increases in serum creatinine beyond AKI may be associated with adverse outcomes including increased hospital length of stay and excess. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a serious and potentially preventable complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Worsening renal function is associated with adverse outcomes including a higher rate of in-hospital mortality. In patients undergoing primary PCI for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), AKI occurs up to 20% of such individuals. Varying definitions of AKI limit comparisons of AKI rates across different studies. Additionally, even small increases in serum creatinine beyond lavels meeting AKI definitions may be associated with adverse outcomes including increased hospital length of stay.

Download Full-text