Relationship between life threatening events and electromechanical window in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a novel parameter for risk stratification of sudden cardiac death Electromechanical window in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mi Kyoung Song ◽  
Seung-Min Baek ◽  
Gi Beom Kim ◽  
Sang-Yun Lee ◽  
Hye Won Kwon ◽  
...  
ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 2316-2319
Author(s):  
Philipp Attanasio ◽  
Wilhelm Haverkamp

Identification of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) who are at high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) is essential, as life-threatening arrhythmic events can be effectively treated with implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. Various models for risk stratification of patients with HCM have been proposed. The latest clinical risk prediction model was developed in 2013. It is based on the HCM Risk-SCD study that included 3675 patients. Risk stratification using this model is recommended in the 2014 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines for management of HCM and in the 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of SCD. This chapter summarizes novelties in the prediction model and the resulting recommendations, and discusses potential limitations of this approach.


Author(s):  
Constantinos O’Mahony

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) secondary to ventricular arrhythmias is the most common mode of death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and can be effectively prevented with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The risk of SCD in HCM relates to the severity of the phenotype and regular risk stratification is an integral part of routine clinical care. For the primary prevention of SCD, risk stratification involves the assessment of seven readily available clinical parameters (age, maximal left ventricular wall thickness, left atrial diameter, left ventricular outflow tract gradient, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, unexplained syncope, and family history of SCD) which are used to estimate the risk of SCD within 5 years of clinical evaluation using a statistical risk prediction model (HCM Risk-SCD). The 2014 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines provide a framework to aid clinical decisions and consider patients with a 5-year risk of SCD of less than 4% as low risk and recommend regular assessment while those with a risk of 6% or higher should be considered for an ICD. In patients with an intermediate risk (4% to <6%) ICD implantation may also be considered after taking into account age, co-morbid conditions, socioeconomic factors, and the psychological impact of therapy. Survivors of ventricular fibrillation arrest should receive an ICD for secondary prevention unless their life expectancy is less than 1 year. Following device implantation, patients should be followed up for device- and disease-related complications, particularly heart failure and cerebrovascular disease.


2015 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 544
Author(s):  
Marina Martínez-Moreno ◽  
Vicente Climent ◽  
Antonio García-Honrubia ◽  
Francisco Marín

EP Europace ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (suppl_3) ◽  
pp. iii128-iii128
Author(s):  
C-K Antoniou ◽  
K. Gatzoulis ◽  
S. Georgopoulos ◽  
A. Anastasakis ◽  
A. Theopistou ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-79
Author(s):  
E. V. Privalova ◽  
V. Yu. Kaplunova ◽  
N. V. Khabarova ◽  
G. A. Shakaryants ◽  
Yu. N. Belenkov

One of the clinical scenarios of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCMP) is sudden cardiac death (SCD). The stratification of SCD risk is the key component of defining the therapeutic strategy in HCMP patients. Timely preventive treatment is the only life-saving intervention in patients with high SCD risk. The available clinical evidence suggests that SCD risk stratification is an effective algorithm for determining the need for preventive treatment. The latter should be individualised, based on the risk levels in each patient. 


2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (21) ◽  
pp. 2593-2598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Michels ◽  
Osama I.I. Soliman ◽  
Judith Phefferkorn ◽  
Yvonne M. Hoedemaekers ◽  
Marcel J. Kofflard ◽  
...  

ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 1462-1466
Author(s):  
Constantinos O’Mahony

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) secondary to ventricular arrhythmias is the most common mode of death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and can be effectively prevented with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The risk of SCD in HCM relates to the severity of the phenotype and regular risk stratification is an integral part of routine clinical care. For the primary prevention of SCD, risk stratification involves the assessment of seven readily available clinical parameters (age, maximal left ventricular wall thickness, left atrial diameter, left ventricular outflow tract gradient, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, unexplained syncope, and family history of SCD) which are used to estimate the risk of SCD within 5 years of clinical evaluation using a statistical risk prediction model (HCM Risk-SCD). The 2014 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines provide a framework to aid clinical decisions and consider patients with a 5-year risk of SCD of less than 4% as low risk and recommend regular assessment while those with a risk of 6% or higher should be considered for an ICD. In patients with an intermediate risk (4% to <6%) ICD implantation may also be considered after taking into account age, co-morbid conditions, socioeconomic factors, and the psychological impact of therapy. Survivors of ventricular fibrillation arrest should receive an ICD for secondary prevention unless their life expectancy is less than 1 year. Following device implantation, patients should be followed up for device- and disease-related complications, particularly heart failure and cerebrovascular disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document