scholarly journals Multiaxial fatigue assessment of welded joints using the notch stress approach

2016 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
pp. 269-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.M. Pedersen
2018 ◽  
Vol 204 ◽  
pp. 344-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Shen ◽  
Renjun Yan ◽  
Feng He ◽  
Shaomin Wang

2019 ◽  
Vol 300 ◽  
pp. 19001
Author(s):  
Giovanni Meneghetti ◽  
Alberto Campagnolo ◽  
Michael Vormwald ◽  
Ehsan Shams

The Peak Stress Method (PSM) is an approximate, FE-oriented application of the notch stress intensity factor (NSIF) approach to fatigue design of welded joints, which is based on the singular linear elastic peak stresses calculated from FE analyses performed by using coarse mesh patterns. By adopting the averaged strain energy density (SED) as a fatigue strength criterion, a design stress (the equivalent peak stress) can be defined; in conjunction with a reference design curve previously defined, the fatigue strength assessment of welded joints subjected to multiaxial fatigue loadings can be performed. In the present contribution, the PSM has been applied to the fatigue assessment of tube-tube steel joints with weld ends, which have been fatigue tested in a previous contribution under combined loadings: namely pure axial, pure torsion and in-phase as well as out-of-phase axial-torsion loadings, all of which with two load ratios, i.e. R = 0 and R = -1. The experimental fatigue results have been re-converted in terms of equivalent peak stress by adopting a 3D FE model including an idealised weld end geometry. The equivalent peak stress has proved to assess the fatigue crack initiation location in agreement with experimental observations, moreover a quite good agreement has been obtained between the experimental results and the PSM-based design scatter band.


Author(s):  
Jürgen Rudolph ◽  
Ralf Trieglaff ◽  
René Stößlein ◽  
Fabian Hauser

The fatigue assessment of welded joints in different engineering disciplines is usually based on nominal, structural or notch stresses on one hand (elastic concept using component fatigue curves of load controlled test data) and local strains on the other hand (elasto-plastic concept using material fatigue curves of strain-controlled push-pull test data of un-notched and polished standard specimens). The concepts of the first mentioned group are implemented in widespread standards and recommendations such as [1] to [3]. The fatigue assessment procedure of the European standard for unfired pressure vessels (EN 13445-3, Clause 17 & 18 and related annexes) [4] is currently under revision with one focus on the elaboration of user friendly fatigue assessment options for welded components [5]. The current state of the art focuses on the application of an adapted structural hot spot stress approach to the fatigue assessment of welded pressure equipment [5]. Although this is a significant step forward, the implementation of a notch stress approach can furtherly increase the fatigue assessment options by detailed weld seam analysis. The paper focuses on respective methodological proposals and application examples of typical welded joints. The finite element analysis as part of the procedure has to be harmonized with the requirements of the assessment procedure. Of course, the compatibility of the hot spot stress approach and a notch stress approach has to be guaranteed for individual examples. The direct comparison of the different approaches allows for a qualitative evaluation of methods. The application of an appropriate master fatigue curve FAT100 and the limitations with regard of stress/strain ranges in the low cycle fatigue (LCF) regime as well as the fatigue assessment of welded joints with mild weld toe notches is the subject of special considerations. The latest recommendations of German Welding Society (DVS) [6] constitute a reference for the last two subjects raised.


2018 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.S. van Lieshout ◽  
J.H. den Besten ◽  
M.L. Kaminski

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document