Analysing and minimizing energy loss is crucial for high performance disk resonator gyroscopes (DRGs). Generally, the primary energy loss mechanism for high vacuum packaged microelectromechanical system (MEMS) resonators includes thermoelastic damping, anchor loss, and electronic damping. In this paper, the thermoelastic damping, anchor loss, and electronic damping for our DRG design are calculated by combining finite element analysis and theoretical derivation. Thermoelastic damping is the dominant energy loss mechanism and contributes over 90% of the total dissipated energy. Benefiting from a symmetrical structure, the anchor loss is low and can be neglected. However, the electronic damping determined by the testing circuit contributes 2.6%–9.6% when the bias voltage increases from 10 V to 20 V, which has a considerable impact on the total quality factor (Q). For comparison, the gyroscope is fabricated and seal-packaged with a measured maximum Q range of 141k to 132k when the bias voltage varies. In conclusion, thermoelastic damping and electronic damping essentially determine the Q of the DRG. Thus, optimizing the resonance structure and testing the circuit to reduce energy loss is prioritized for a high-performance DRG design.
Energy Loss in a MEMS Disk Resonator Gyroscope
