scholarly journals Large eddy simulation of film cooling with vortex generators between two consecutive cooling rows

2022 ◽  
Vol 182 ◽  
pp. 121955
Author(s):  
Zhiyuan Zhao ◽  
Fengbo Wen ◽  
Xiaolei Tang ◽  
Jiaxin Song ◽  
Yuxi Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Vortex Generators ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy

Large eddy simulation of pulsed film cooling with vortex generators

2021 ◽  
Vol 180 ◽  
pp. 121806
Author(s):  
Zhiyuan Zhao ◽  
Fengbo Wen ◽  
Xiaolei Tang ◽  
Jiaxin Song ◽  
Zhongqi Wang
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Vortex Generators ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy

scholarly journals Large Eddy Simulation of Film Cooling Involving Compound Angle Holes: Comparative Study of LES and RANS

Processes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 198
Author(s):  
Seung Il Baek ◽  
Joon Ahn
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Orientation Angle ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Film Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Injection Angle ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Compound Angle

A large eddy simulation (LES) was performed for film cooling in the gas turbine blade involving spanwise injection angles (orientation angles). For a streamwise coolant injection angle (inclination angle) of 35°, the effects of the orientation angle were compared considering a simple angle of 0° and 30°. Two ratios of the coolant to main flow mass flux (blowing ratio) of 0.5 and 1.0 were considered and the experimental conditions of Jung and Lee (2000) were adopted for the geometry and flow conditions. Moreover, a Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes simulation (RANS) was performed to understand the characteristics of the turbulence models compared to those in the LES and experiments. In the RANS, three turbulence models were compared, namely, the realizable k-ε, k-ω shear stress transport, and Reynolds stress models. The temperature field and flow fields predicted through the RANS were similar to those obtained through the experiment and LES. Nevertheless, at a simple angle, the point at which the counter-rotating vortex pair (CRVP) collided on the wall and rose was different from that in the experiment and LES. Under the compound angle, the point at which the CRVP changed to a single vortex was different from that in the LES. The adiabatic film cooling effectiveness could not be accurately determined through the RANS but was well reflected by the LES, even under the compound angle. The reattachment of the injectant at a blowing ratio of 1.0 was better predicted by the RANS at the compound angle than at the simple angle. The temperature fluctuation was predicted to decrease slightly when the injectant was supplied at a compound angle.

Loss Predictions in the High-Pressure Film-Cooled Turbine Blade Cascade T120D by Mean of Wall-Resolved Large Eddy Simulation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mael Harnieh ◽  
Nicolas Odier ◽  
Jérôme Dombard ◽  
Florent Duchaine ◽  
Laurent Gicquel
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Turbine Blade ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Load Prediction ◽  
Loss Assessment ◽  
Film Cooling Effectiveness ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Blade Cascade ◽  
Large Eddy

Abstract Film cooling is commonly used to protect turbine vanes and blades from the hot gases produced in the combustion chamber. The design and optimization of these systems can however only be achieved if a precise prediction of the fluid mechanics and film efficiency is guaranteed at a level where induced losses are fully mastered. Such a prerequisite induces at the numerical level to be able to identify and assess losses. In this context, the present study addresses loss assessment in a wall-resolved Large Eddy Simulation (LES) of the film-cooled high-pressure turbine blade cascade T120D from the European project AITEB II. The objectives are twofolds: (1) to evaluate the capacity of LES to predict adiabatic film cooling effectiveness in a mastered academic case; and (2) to investigate loss generation mechanisms in a fully anisothermal configuration. When it comes to LES predictions of T120D, the flow structure around the blade and the coolant jet organization are coherent with literature findings. Satisfactory agreements are furthermore retrieved for the pressure load prediction as well as the adiabatic film effectiveness if compared to the experiment. Loss generation is then investigated illustrating the fact that aerodynamics losses dominate mixing losses which are mainly located in the coolant film. This is in line with the temperature difference between the hot and coolant flows that is low for this experimental condition. Distinct contributions can however be made available by studying the local loss generation maps by means of Second Law Analysis if recast in the specific context of anisothermal flows when simulated by LES.

Large Eddy Simulation of the 7-7-7 Shaped Film Cooling Hole at Axial and Compound Angle Orientations

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Tracy ◽  
Stephen P. Lynch
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Flow Direction ◽  
Main Flow ◽  
Blowing Ratio ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Cooling Hole ◽  
Main Flow Direction ◽  
Compound Angle

Abstract Shaped film cooling holes are used extensively for film cooling in gas turbines due to their superior performance in keeping coolant attached to the surface, relative to cylindrical holes. However, fewer studies have examined the impact of the orientation of the shaped hole axis relative to the main flow direction, known as a compound angle. A compound angle can occur intentionally due to manufacturing, or unintentionally due to changes in the main flow direction at off-design conditions. In either case, the compound angle causes the film cooling jet to roll up into a strong streamwise vortex that changes the lateral distribution of coolant, relative to the pair of vortices that develop from an axially oriented film cooling hole. In this study, Large Eddy Simulation (LES) using the Wall-Adapting Local Eddy Viscosity (WALE) model was performed on the publicly available 7-7-7 shaped film cooling hole, at two orientations (0°, 30°) and two blowing ratios (M = 1, 3). Laterally-averaged film effectiveness was largely unchanged by a compound angle at a blowing ratio of 1, but improved at a blowing ratio of 3. For both blowing ratios, the lateral distribution of film was more uniform with the addition of a 30° compound angle. Both wall normal and lateral turbulent convective heat transfer was increased by the addition of a compound angle at both blowing ratios.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document