Prediction of state property during hydrogen leaks from high-pressure hydrogen storage systems

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (39) ◽  
pp. 22394-22404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang Zou ◽  
Ying Tian ◽  
Feng Han
2022 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 103761
Author(s):  
Jianjun Ye ◽  
Zhenhua Zhao ◽  
Junxu Cui ◽  
Zhengli Hua ◽  
Wenzhu Peng ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 59 (19) ◽  
pp. 2302-2308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue-Fang Li ◽  
David M. Christopher ◽  
Jing-Liang Bi

Author(s):  
Z. Y. Li ◽  
C. L. Zhou ◽  
Y. Z. Zhao ◽  
Z. L. Hua ◽  
L. Zhang ◽  
...  

Crack growth analysis (CGA) was applied to estimate the cycle life of the high-pressure hydrogen equipment constructed by the practical materials of 4340 (two heats), 4137, 4130X, A286, type 316 (solution-annealed (SA) and cold-worked (CW)), and type 304 (SA and CW) in 45, 85 and 105 MPa hydrogen and air. The wall thickness was calculated following five regulations of the High Pressure Gas Safety Institute of Japan (KHK) designated equipment rule, KHKS 0220, TSG R0002, JB4732, and ASME Sec. VIII, Div. 3. We also applied CGA for four typical model materials to discuss the effect of ultimate tensile strength (UTS), pressure and hydrogen sensitivity on the cycle life of the high-pressure hydrogen equipment. Leak before burst (LBB) was confirmed in all practical materials in hydrogen and air. The minimum KIC required for LBB of the model material with UTS of even 1500 MPa was 170 MPa·m0.5 in 105 MPa. Cycle life qualified 103 cycles for all practical materials in air. In 105 MPa hydrogen, the cycle life by KIH was much shorter than that in air for two heats of 4340 and 4137 sensitive to hydrogen gas embrittlement (HGE). The cycle life of type 304 (SA) sensitive to HGE was almost above 104 cycles in hydrogen, while the cycle life of type 316 (SA and CW) was not affected by hydrogen and that of A286 in hydrogen was near to that in air. It was discussed that the cycle life increased with decreasing pressure or UTS in hydrogen. This behavior was due to that KIH increased or fatigue crack growth (FCG) decreased with decreasing pressure or UTS. The cycle life data of the model materials under the conditions of the pressure, UTS, KIH, FCG and regulations in both hydrogen and air were proposed quantitatively for materials selection for high-pressure hydrogen storage.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. P. Vinayan ◽  
K. Sethupathi ◽  
S. Ramaprabhu ◽  
Alka B. Garg ◽  
R. Mittal ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (38) ◽  
pp. 13183-13192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Pedro Berro Ramirez ◽  
Damien Halm ◽  
Jean-Claude Grandidier ◽  
Stéphane Villalonga ◽  
Fabien Nony

Author(s):  
Bo Yang ◽  
Jian-ping Yao ◽  
Yi-wen Yuan ◽  
Jie-lu Wang ◽  
Yao-zhou Qian ◽  
...  

Hydrogen energy as the cleanest fuel to replace gasoline has been accepted by society, hydrogen fuel could be promoted based on the safety of hydrogen-fuel storage containers. For risk-controlling of hydrogen storage containers, there are many laws and regulations in UN and EU set the strict technical requirements on high pressure hydrogen storage systems and require a lot of rigorous experimental verification should be performed before mass production. Frame of GTR No.13, ECER No.134 and EU No406/2010 and the content relevant with high-pressure hydrogen storage container would be discussed emphatically in this paper. Rigorous testing methods in regulations and standards are compared and comments on hydrogen storage container performance testing are provided, besides, some important testing items are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document