The UK oil and gas supply chains: An empirical analysis of adoption of sustainable measures and performance outcomes

2013 ◽  
Vol 146 (2) ◽  
pp. 501-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yahaya Y. Yusuf ◽  
A. Gunasekaran ◽  
Ahmed Musa ◽  
Nagham M. El-Berishy ◽  
Tijjani Abubakar ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Urciuoli ◽  
Sangeeta Mohanty ◽  
Juha Hintsa ◽  
Else Gerine Boekesteijn

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to enhance the understanding about how energy supply chains work to build resilience against exogenous security threats and thereafter what support mechanisms should be introduced or improved by the European Union. Design/methodology/approach – Five case studies and data collection from multiple sources is used to understand what exogenous security threats could lead to the disruption of oil and gas flows to Europe, how energy companies, from a supply chain perspective, are working to manage these threats and finally, how the EU may coordinate the security of the energy sector in collaboration with supply chain companies. Findings – Results show that today, oil and gas supply chains have in place a good combination of disruption strategies, including portfolio diversification, flexible contracts, transport capacity planning and safety stocks. The most relevant security threats the companies fear, include hijacking of vessels (sea piracy), but also terrorism, and wars. Finally, the study highlights that the European Union has built a comprehensive portfolio of strategies to deal with scarcity of oil and gas resources. However, these approaches are not often synchronized with supply chain strategies. Practical implications – The paper provides guidance for supply chain managers dealing with critical suppliers located in conflict environments. The paper recommends that supply chain managers fine tune their strategies in coordination with governmental actions in foreign politics, dependence reduction and crisis management. This may be achieved by closer communication with governments and potentially through the creation of a pan-European sector alliance. Originality/value – Previous research discusses the topic of supply chain resilience and supply chain risk management. However, none of these studies report on exogenous security threats and disruption strategies of oil and gas supply chains. At the same time, previous research lacks detailed studies describing the interaction between governments and energy supply chains.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Kruitwagen ◽  
Jannes Klaas ◽  
Arash Baghaei Lakeh ◽  
Jessica Fan

2014 ◽  
Vol 147 ◽  
pp. 498-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yahaya Y. Yusuf ◽  
Ahmed Musa ◽  
Mohammed Dauda ◽  
Nagham El-Berishy ◽  
Dharma Kovvuri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 633
Author(s):  
M. Williamson

Australia’s corporate regulatory authorities have been extensively lobbied during the last 10 years to move to adopt an international set of accounting standards that the major nations of the world have evolved. Following the establishment of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) in the UK, that body has moved to promulgate a broad range of accounting standards. Australia has been a member of the IASB from its early days.The IASB has moved to promulgate some accounting standards. The Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) has moved to adopt these same standards. In effect, the intent of those standards has been converted to Australian terms. The bulk of these new accounting standards (AASBs) will be effective for the first time to accounts of reporting entities for the years after 1 January 2005.The intention of the adoption of these standards has been to provide a consistent platform for the preparation of accounts in all of the major countries of the world. The expectation is to promote consistent reporting and more ready comparability between participants in various industries and between industries and from year to year.For a number of oil and gas listed companies, however, the short to medium-term is likely to produce the exact opposite in results and comparability terms. Accounting results for years prior to the adoption of the new AASBs will in certain circumstances bear results so dissimilar that their usage will be misleading.The conversion effort from the old standards to the new standards will involve considerable effort by all participants in the oil and gas industry; this should have started months ago.There will also be spin-off problems causing many legal documents, including borrowing agreements and performance bonus agreements that will need to be re-written. There will only be havoc in an administrative context if those oil and gas companies have not prepared themselves well and in a timely fashion. There may be financial havoc if the changes in accounting policies via the International Financial Reporting System (IFRS) make it difficult to raise new capital or cause problems under existing borrowing covenants.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document