Combined Androgen Blockade in Men with Intermediate and High Risk Localized Prostate Cancer Treated with Definitive Radiation Therapy

Author(s):  
L. Vitzthum ◽  
C.A. Straka ◽  
R.R. Sarkar ◽  
R. Mckay ◽  
J.D. Murphy ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 1497-1504
Author(s):  
Lucas K. Vitzthum ◽  
Chris Straka ◽  
Reith R. Sarkar ◽  
Rana McKay ◽  
J. Michael Randall ◽  
...  

Background: The addition of androgen deprivation therapy to radiation therapy (RT) improves survival in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa), but it is not known whether combined androgen blockade (CAB) with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-A) and a nonsteroidal antiandrogen improves survival over GnRH-A monotherapy. Methods: This study evaluated patients with intermediate- and high-risk PCa diagnosed in 2001 through 2015 who underwent RT with either GnRH-A alone or CAB using the Veterans Affairs Informatics and Computing Infrastructure. Associations between CAB and prostate cancer–specific mortality (PCSM) and overall survival (OS) were determined using multivariable regression with Fine-Gray and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, respectively. For a positive control, the effect of long-term versus short-term GnRH-A therapy was tested. Results: The cohort included 8,423 men (GnRH-A, 4,529; CAB, 3,894) with a median follow-up of 5.9 years. There were 1,861 deaths, including 349 resulting from PCa. The unadjusted cumulative incidences of PCSM at 10 years were 5.9% and 6.9% for those receiving GnRH-A and CAB, respectively (P=.16). Compared with GnRH-A alone, CAB was not associated with a significant difference in covariate-adjusted PCSM (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 1.05; 95% CI, 0.85–1.30) or OS (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.93–1.12). For high-risk patients, long-term versus short-term GnRH-A therapy was associated with improved PCSM (SHR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.57–0.95) and OS (SHR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73–0.93). Conclusions: In men receiving definitive RT for intermediate- or high-risk PCa, CAB was not associated with improved PCSM or OS compared with GnRH alone.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 124-124
Author(s):  
Anteneh A. Tesfaye

124 Background: Unlike in localized prostate cancer with low recurrence risk features, the role of BT in localized prostate cancer with intermediate and high risk features is not well defined. The aim of this study is to compare the survival rates of such pts treated with BT & EBRT using the SEER database in the 3 different risk levels. Methods: The 1973-2009 SEER database was reviewed for men with T1-2N0M0 prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy alone between 2004-2009. Pts with additional malignancies and combination radiation therapy were excluded. Localized Prostate cancer was stratified into low (T1, T2a and PSA<10 and Gleason ≤6), intermediate (T2b or PSA=10-20 or Gleason =7) and high (T2c or PSA >20 or Gleason ≥8) risk for recurrence. Results: A total of 73,867 pts were retrieved from the database, of which 24,661 (33.4%) were treated with BT and 49,206 (66.6%) with EBRT. Pts treated with BT had younger median age, lower PSA, Gleason’s score, and T staging than EBRT. Five year overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) rates are shown in the table. On multivariate analyses, T staging, PSA level, Gleason’s score and type of radiation therapy were independent prognostic factors for 5 year CSS & OS. In pts with localized prostate cancer, those treated with EBRT had 47% higher odds of dying from prostate cancer compared to those treated with BT at the end of 5 years. (HR (95% CI) =1.47 (1.113-1.94); p=0.007). Conclusions: In patients with localized prostate cancer treated with radiation alone, BT is seen to have superior 5 year OS over EBRT in all 3 risk levels. BT also has superior 5 year CSS in low and high risk levels, while being comparable in intermediate risk levels. Prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to validate this finding. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document