scholarly journals Transmesenteric hernia: A rare cause of bowel ischaemia in adults

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 568-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Butterworth ◽  
Trent Cross ◽  
William Butterworth ◽  
Paul Mousa ◽  
S. Thomas
VASA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 273-277
Author(s):  
Christopher Lowe ◽  
Oussama El Bakbachi ◽  
Damian Kelleher ◽  
Imran Asghar ◽  
Francesco Torella ◽  
...  

Abstract. The aim of this review was to investigate presentation, aetiology, management, and outcomes of bowel ischaemia following EVAR. We present a case report and searched electronic bibliographic databases to identify published reports of bowel ischaemia following elective infra-renal EVAR not involving hypogastric artery coverage or iliac branch devices. We conducted our review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement standards. In total, five cohort studies and three case reports were included. These studies detailed some 6,184 infra-renal elective EVARs, without procedure-related occlusion of the hypogastric arteries, performed between 1996 and 2014. Bowel ischaemia in this setting is uncommon with an incidence ranging from 0.5 to 2.8 % and includes a spectrum of severity from mucosal to transmural ischaemia. Due to varying reporting standards, an overall proportion of patients requiring bowel resection could not be ascertained. In the larger series, mortality ranged from 35 to 80 %. Atheroembolization, hypotension, and inferior mesenteric artery occlusion were reported as potential causative factors. Elderly patients and those undergoing prolonged procedures appear at higher risk. Bowel ischaemia is a rare but potentially devastating complication following elective infra-renal EVAR and can occur in the setting of patent mesenteric vessels and hypogastric arteries. Mortality ranges from 35 to 80 %. Further research is required to identify risk factors and establish prophylactic measures in patients that have an increased risk of developing bowel ischaemia after standard infra-renal EVAR.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. e238593
Author(s):  
Asya Veloso Costa ◽  
Asiya Zhunus ◽  
Rehana Hafeez ◽  
Arsh Gupta

Cocaine use causes profound vasoconstriction leading to various systemic complications. Gastrointestinal complications such as mesenteric ischaemia are difficult to recognise and may result in serious consequences if not treated promptly. We report on the case of a 47-year-old man presenting with mesenteric ischaemia on a background of acute on chronic cocaine consumption, where diagnosis was not evident until second presentation. He underwent an emergency laparotomy with small bowel resection and jejunostomy formation and made a good recovery with eventual reversal surgery. The literature on cocaine-induced bowel ischaemia shows significant variability in presentation and outcome. Laboratory investigations are non-specific, and early recognition is vital. Given the increasing recreational use of cocaine in the UK, it is imperative to have a high clinical index of suspicion for mesenteric ischaemia in patients presenting with non-specific abdominal pain, and to ensure a detailed social history covering recreational drug use is not forgotten.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. e237165
Author(s):  
Martha Sara Kedrzycki ◽  
Jaya Roy Choudhury ◽  
Sherif Hakky

Caecal volvulus is an infrequent cause of acute surgical abdomen, where an abnormally mobile cecum twists on its own axis. It can lead to the development of closed-loop obstruction, small bowel ischaemia and perforation. Early recognition and prompt treatment is key; however, due to the rarity of this pathology, it is seldom listed as a differential diagnosis. Here, we present a single-centre case series of two patients presenting with caecal volvulus to an Emergency Surgery Unit at a University Hospital.


2022 ◽  
pp. 103256
Author(s):  
Bibek Man Shrestha ◽  
Suraj Shrestha ◽  
Shiva Aryal ◽  
Susan Pradhan ◽  
Romi Dahal ◽  
...  

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S67-S67
Author(s):  
Holly Boyd ◽  
Anna Manso de Zuniga

AimsTo establish how often bowel habits are monitored in inpatients on clozapineTo determine how many of these patients are prescribed laxatives and whether these are utilisedBackgroundIt's estimated that 30-60% of patients will suffer from constipation whilst on clozapine; this can lead to ileus, intestinal obstruction and bowel ischaemia, all of which can be fatal. Constipation is much more common than clozapine-induced blood dyscrasias, and has a higher mortality rate. Despite this, there is no strict universal framework for bowel habit monitoring equivalent to the compulsory FBC monitoring. Local trust guidance indicates that bowel habits should be monitored regularly, at least at any point of blood sampling. However, monitoring processes across the trust were noted to be variable, as were laxative prescribing practices.MethodThe data sample of current inpatients on clozapine across the trust was identified from pharmacy records. The patient's Rio notes from the preceding 3 months were searched for predetermined terms relating to bowel habits and constipation, and the notes were then analysed for assessment of bowel habit. The number of FBCs collected during this 3 month period was then used to produce comparison with the audit standard. The data on laxative prescribing were collected from current medication lists on EPMA.ResultA data sample of 31 current inpatients was identified. The audit found that only 54.8% (17) of patients had their bowel habits monitored at least with every FBC taken. There was significant variability between different wards, with the best performing ward having 100% adherence to the audit standard, and the worst performing having 0%. In terms of laxative prescribing, it was found that 87.1% (27) of patients had at least 1 regular or 1 PRN laxative prescribed. Regular laxatives were prescribed for 61.2% (19) of patients, whereas only PRN laxatives were prescribed in 25.8% (8) of patients. Of those prescribed only PRN laxatives, only 50% (4) ever utilised this medication.ConclusionBowel habits are not consistently monitored across the trust in inpatients on clozapine, leaving room for potentially life-threatening side effects to be missed. Additionally, regular laxative prescribing is not standard throughout the trust, which could further add to the potential for significant constipation-related morbidity to occur. A standard method of monitoring bowel habits throughout the trust, as well as a trust laxative prescribing policy, could be a way of remedying this issue and preventing harmful outcomes for our patients on clozapine.


Medicine ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 178-180
Author(s):  
Kevin Varty
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document