scholarly journals Post-operative C-reactive protein profile following abdominal wall reconstruction with transversus abdominis posterior components separation

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 17-19
Author(s):  
A. Pearce ◽  
L. Thornton ◽  
P.A. Sutton ◽  
C.J. Walsh
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Protein Profile ◽  
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Components Separation ◽  
Reactive Protein

scholarly journals Posterior Components Separation With Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR) Versus Alternative Techniques of Components Separation: Systematic Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 355-365
Author(s):  
Aseel Sleiwah ◽  
Sandra McAllister
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Primary Repair ◽  
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction ◽  
Hernia Recurrence ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Components Separation ◽  
Abdominal Hernias ◽  
Wall Components

The aim of this study is to assess the clinical effectiveness of posterior abdominal wall components separation with transversus abdominis muscle release (PCS-TAR) in the management of ventral abdominal hernias. Ventral abdominal hernias complicate up to 11% of laparotomy wounds. Surgical management includes primary repair, hernioplasty, flaps, and components separation. A technique has been described to close large abdominal defects by releasing bilateral myofascial flaps of rectus abdominis from external oblique and advancing these flaps to the midline. Minimally invasive and endoscopic techniques were subsequently developed to reduce complications. A recently described method is PCS-TAR. The hypothesis is that PCS-TAR for abdominal wall reconstruction is associated with lower rates of wound complications and hernia recurrence than other components separation techniques. A comprehensive search of databases including Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, looking for the primary outcomes of hernia recurrence and wound complications following different techniques of components separation. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined. The quality of studies was examined independently by 2 assessors. A total of 363 studies were identified. Three retrospective comparative studies met the inclusion criteria. No randomized control trial comparing different techniques of abdominal wall components separation was identified. No technique could be identified as superior to others, due to a paucity of the literature. However, based on a few retrospective cohort studies, PCS-TAR emerges as a well-tolerated new technique, with a low incidence of wound complications and hernia recurrence.

scholarly journals Initial UK experience with transversus abdominis muscle release for posterior components separation in abdominal wall reconstruction of large or complex ventral hernias: a combined approach by general and plastic surgeons

2017 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
pp. 265-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
ND Appleton ◽  
KD Anderson ◽  
K Hancock ◽  
MH Scott ◽  
CJ Walsh
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Fascial Closure ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Components Separation ◽  
Aesthetic Appearance ◽  
Ventral Hernias ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Muscle

Introduction Large, complicated ventral hernias are an increasingly common problem. The transversus abdominis muscle release (TAMR) is a recently described modification of posterior components separation for repair of such hernias. We describe our initial experience with TAMR and sublay mesh to facilitate abdominal wall reconstruction. Methods The study is a retrospective review of patients undergoing TAMR performed synchronously by gastrointestinal and plastic surgeons. Results Twelve consecutive patients had their ventral hernias repaired using the TAMR technique from June 2013 to June 2014. Median body mass index was 30.8kg/m2 (range 19.0–34.4kg/m2). Four had a previous ventral hernia repair. Three had previous laparostomies. Four had previous stomas and three had stomas created at the time of the abdominal wall reconstruction. Average transverse distance between the recti was 13cm (3-20cm). Median operative time was 383 minutes (150–550 minutes) and mesh size was 950cm2 (532–2400cm2). Primary midline fascial closure was possible in all cases, with no bridging. Median length of hospital stay was 7.5 days (4–17 days). Three developed minor abdominal wall wound complications. At median review of 24 months (18–37 months), there have been no significant wound problems, mesh infections or explants, and none has developed recurrence of their midline ventral hernia. Visual analogue scales revealed high patient satisfaction levels overall and with their final aesthetic appearance. Conclusions We believe that TAMR offers significant advantages over other forms of components separation in this patient group. The technique can be adopted successfully in UK practice and combined gastrointestinal and plastic surgeon operating yields good results.

Systematic review of transversus abdominis release in complex abdominal wall reconstruction

Hernia ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Wegdam ◽  
J. M. M. Thoolen ◽  
S. W. Nienhuijs ◽  
N. de Bouvy ◽  
T. S. de Vries Reilingh
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Transversus Abdominis Release

scholarly journals Ventral hernia from routine repairs to abdominal wall reconstruction: our initial experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 3348
Author(s):  
Sheetal Ishwarappagol ◽  
Rohit Krishnappa
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction ◽  
Tobacco Consumption ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Abdominal Pressure ◽  
Postural Stabilization ◽  
History Of ◽  
And Function ◽  
Ventral Hernias

Background: Loss of continuity of abdominal wall significantly affects the functions of protection of viscera, postural stabilization, and maintenance of intra-abdominal pressure. The newer understanding of abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) aims at restoring abdominal wall anatomy and function, instead of simply patching the defect. We want to showcase the changing trends and results in hernia repair at a Medical Institution.Methods: This is an observational retrospective study conducted in RRMCH, Bengaluru from July 2018-2019 including all patients with ventral hernia undergoing the specified hernia repairs.Results: A total of 54 patients with ventral hernias undergoing routine hernia repairs/AWR surgeries were retrospectively analysed. The overall mean age was 46.62±12.44 year. Majority subjects were females (n=37; 68.5%), and overweight (Mean BMI=28.07±3.01/m2). 14 patients (25.92%), all males, had history of tobacco consumption. There were 38 (70.37%) primary ventral hernias and 7 recurrent hernias. Overall mean defect size was 10.2±0.4 cm. Most frequently performed was open retro rectus Hernioplasty (n=18; 33.33%), followed by open Preperitoneal Hernioplasty (n=17; 31.48%), laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) (n=16; 29.62%) and open transversus abdominis release (TAR) (n=3; 5.5%). On statistical analysis, it was found that Open repairs had higher post-operative pain (p=0.0005), longer hospitalization (p=0.0002) and higher incidence of surgical site events (p=0.0134) when compared to Laparoscopic repairs.Conclusion: As known already, minimally invasive techniques of hernia surgeries are shown to have acceptable outcomes when compared to radical open surgeries. Newer techniques of AWR are being employed to routine cases in larger numbers, and not just for complex reconstruction, at most centres with acceptable outcomes. 

Concomitant Anterior and Posterior Component Separations: Absolutely Contraindicated?

2020 ◽  
pp. 155335062091419
Author(s):  
Jorge Daes ◽  
Joshua S. Winder ◽  
Eric M. Pauli
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Lateral Displacement ◽  
Abdominal Wall Reconstruction ◽  
Component Separation ◽  
Transversus Abdominis ◽  
Lateral Abdominal Wall ◽  
Computed Tomography Images ◽  
Fresh Cadaver ◽  
Semilunar Line ◽  
Internal Oblique

Many experts in abdominal wall reconstruction believe that the combination of simultaneous ipsilateral anterior component separation (ACS) and posterior component separation (PCS) is contraindicated. We performed ipsilateral endoscopic ACS and either endoscopic or open PCS-transversus abdominis release (TAR) in 5 fresh cadaver models. The full length of the semilunar line and the lateral abdominal wall remained well reinforced by 2 complete layers, comprising the internal oblique (IO) and TA muscles and their investing fasciae. Myofascial releases occurred 4 cm (median) apart. Additionally, we reviewed computed tomography images at 1 month and 1 year after PCS-TAR in 17 patients (30 PCS-TARs). Lateral displacement of the TA relative to the rectus abdominis (RA) was significant only at the superior mesenteric artery level, where it was <1 cm (median). Muscle mass changed minimally over time. Several studies showed that abdominal wall reconstruction after PCS-TAR results in compensatory muscular hypertrophy of the RA, external oblique (EO), and IO muscles and provides better quality of life and improved core physiology. These changes did not occur when the midline was not restored. Theoretically, endoscopic ACS-EO may be added to PCS-TAR to avoid partially bridged mesh repair in patients in whom complete midline restoration is impossible via PCS-TAR alone. Nevertheless, we advise most surgeons to perform a small-bridged repair instead of risking increased morbidity by attempting a highly complicated procedure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document