scholarly journals Optimization of modular tensegrity structures for high stiffness and frequency separation requirements

2016 ◽  
Vol 80 ◽  
pp. 297-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasseradeen Ashwear ◽  
Ganesh Tamadapu ◽  
Anders Eriksson
Alloy Digest ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  

Abstract NJZ Alloy No. 55 is a zinc-cadmium alloy characterized by high tensile strength and hardness but low ductility. It has high stiffness and resiliency but low drawing and forming characteristics. Its applications include hardware and medallions. This datasheet provides information on composition, physical properties, hardness, and tensile properties as well as creep and fatigue. It also includes information on corrosion resistance as well as casting, forming, heat treating, machining, and joining. Filing Code: Zn-30. Producer or source: New Jersey Zinc Company.


Alloy Digest ◽  
1976 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  

Abstract NJZ Alloy No. 45 is a zinc-copper alloy characterized by high hardness and strength, good ductility and high stiffness. It work hardens easily. Among its many applications are hardware, sporting-equipment components, cable wrappings and watch cases. This datasheet provides information on composition, physical properties, hardness, and tensile properties as well as creep and fatigue. It also includes information on corrosion resistance as well as casting, forming, heat treating, machining, and joining. Filing Code: Zn-25. Producer or source: New Jersey Zinc Company.


Author(s):  
Xiaobin Lian ◽  
Jinxiu Zhang ◽  
Lang Lu ◽  
Jihe Wang ◽  
Lixuan Liu ◽  
...  

Machines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 74
Author(s):  
Chan-Ho Baek ◽  
Hyo-Seob Shin ◽  
Jang-Young Choi

In this study, the iron losses of high flux density concentrated winding-type interior permanent magnet synchronous motors for three different magnet shapes (single-V, single-flat, and dual-delta) and rotor structures are analyzed and compared. Iron loss is analyzed using the classical Steinmetz equation (CSE) based on the frequency separation approach using the iron loss material table, and each rotor type is compared. In addition, to validate the hysteresis loss for each rotor type, two additional analyses are performed. In the methods considered, the number of minor loops is counted, and the area is calculated based on DC bias. The eddy current loss is compared using two approaches: CSE base frequency separation and the homogenization method considering the skin effect. This study primarily focuses on the comparison of relative iron losses based on different rotor topologies instead of absolute comparisons.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document