scholarly journals Determination of baseline bone mineral density using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in Suffolk-Dorset hybrid ewes

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subburamanujam Ayyappan ◽  
Bharathi Niveditha ◽  
Gert J. Breur
10.12737/9082 ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-79
Author(s):  
Захаров ◽  
I. Zakharov

Currently, the radiation techniques are dominant in the diagnosis of osteoporosis, among them the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the leading. This method is based on the determination of bone mineral density. The article describes a computerized system Standart LS (Russia), which standardizes the parameters of bone mineral density, depending on the type of densitometry equipment and evaluates the results of X-ray densitometry taking into account a regional perspective. The developed program and population database of parameters of bone mineral density were the results of retrospective analysis of the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in 1504 women living in Kemerovo region. The dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was performed with a bone densitometer Lunar-DPX-NT (GE Healthcare, UK). Initially, the bone mineral density of the first-fourth lumbar vertebrae was studied; then, the standardization of other parameters of densitometric systems was carried out (Hologic, Norland). The algorithm of the computer program consists of three phases: the introduction of parameters of bone mineral density, the standardization and the processing according to a type of densitometer and an age of a subject. After data processing, the values of Z-criteria are given out according to the recommendations of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. The developed computerized system will contribute to a more accurate assessment of bone mineral density in the women, taking into account regional differences.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 227.2-228
Author(s):  
D. Claire ◽  
M. Geoffroy ◽  
L. Kanagaratnam ◽  
C. Isabelle ◽  
A. Hittinger ◽  
...  

Background:Dual energy X-ray absoprtiometry is the reference method to mesure bone mineral density (1). Loss of bone mineral density is significant if it exceeds the least significant change. The threshold value used in general population is 0,03 g/cm2 (2). Patients with obesity are known for having a higher bone mineral density due to metabolism and physiopathology characteristics (3,4).Objectives:The aim of our study was to determine the least significant change in bone densitometry in patients with obesity.Methods:We conducted an interventionnal study in 120 patients with obesity who performed a bone densitometry. We measured twice the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine, the femoral neck and the total hip in the same time (5,6). We determined the least significant change in bone densitometry from each pair of measurements, using the Bland and Altman method. We also determined the least significant change in bone densitometry according to each stage of obesity.Results:The least significant change in bone densitometry in patients with obesity is 0,046g/cm2 at the lumbar spine, 0.069 g/cm2 at the femoral neck and 0.06 g/cm2 at the total hip.Conclusion:The least significant change in bone densitometry in patients with obesity is higher than in general population. These results may improve DXA interpretation in this specific population, and may personnalize their medical care.References:[1]Lees B, Stevenson JC. An evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and comparison with dual-photon absorptiometry. Osteoporos Int. mai 1992;2(3):146-52.[2]Briot K, Roux C, Thomas T, Blain H, Buchon D, Chapurlat R, et al. Actualisation 2018 des recommandations françaises du traitement de l’ostéoporose post-ménopausique. Rev Rhum. oct 2018;85(5):428-40.[3]Shapses SA, Pop LC, Wang Y. Obesity is a concern for bone health with aging. Nutr Res N Y N. mars 2017;39:1-13.[4]Savvidis C, Tournis S, Dede AD. Obesity and bone metabolism. Hormones. juin 2018;17(2):205-17.[5]Roux C, Garnero P, Thomas T, Sabatier J-P, Orcel P, Audran M, et al. Recommendations for monitoring antiresorptive therapies in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Jt Bone Spine Rev Rhum. janv 2005;72(1):26-31.[6]Ravaud P, Reny JL, Giraudeau B, Porcher R, Dougados M, Roux C. Individual smallest detectable difference in bone mineral density measurements. J Bone Miner Res. août 1999;14(8):1449-56.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.


1995 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-148
Author(s):  
Ryuzou Takaya ◽  
Masakuni Tokuda ◽  
Tatsuya Oguni ◽  
Haruki Tanaka ◽  
Kazutaka Konishi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document