scholarly journals Selection of magnesium hydroxide coatings for corrosion mitigation in concrete sewer pipes by using multiple criteria decision analysis

Author(s):  
Domna Merachtsaki ◽  
Stefanos Tsiaras ◽  
Effrosyni Peleka ◽  
Anastasios Zouboulis
2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Aldabbas ◽  
Francesca Venteicher ◽  
Lenna Gerber ◽  
Marino Widmer

Abstract This paper addresses the issue of selecting a suitable location for a fire station in canton of Fribourg, as a result of a fire brigades’ merger, by applying Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods. Solving the problem of determining fire station locations through various methods has been analyzed in-depth by researchers. However, a different approach, based on application of ELECTRE I and ELECTRE II methods is advanced in this paper. The selection of the most suitable fire station site is obtained by applying the designated methods to five distinctive alternatives (called scenarios), taking into consideration the relatively limited information and specifics, and the extensive number of relevant criteria that summed up to sixty-one. Taking the merger of the three local fire departments as an example, the proposed methods for selecting a suitable location for the fire station demonstrate and justify the reason behind this choice. Research shows that the applied methods have been proven to be useful and powerful tools that exhibited acceptable levels of consistency when selecting the best project. The main finding is that one scenario in particular proved to be preferred over the others and most suitable in determining the fire station location.


2016 ◽  
Vol 168 ◽  
pp. 260-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza Javidi Sabbaghian ◽  
Mahdi Zarghami ◽  
A. Pouyan Nejadhashemi ◽  
Mohammad Bagher Sharifi ◽  
Matthew R. Herman ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 238146832199406
Author(s):  
Yee Vern Yong ◽  
Siti Hajar Mahamad Dom ◽  
Nurulmaya Ahmad Sa’ad ◽  
Rosliza Lajis ◽  
Faridah Aryani Md. Yusof ◽  
...  

Objectives. The current health technology assessment used to evaluate respiratory inhalers is associated with limitations that have necessitated the development of an explicit formulary decision-making framework to ensure balance between the accessibility, value, and affordability of medicines. This study aimed to develop a multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework, apply the framework to potential and currently listed respiratory inhalers in the Ministry of Health Medicines Formulary (MOHMF), and analyze the impacts of applying the outputs, from the perspective of listing and delisting medicines in the formulary. Methods. The overall methodology of the framework development adhered to the recommendations of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force. The MCDA framework was developed using Microsoft Excel 2010 and involved all relevant stakeholders. The framework was then applied to 27 medicines, based on data gathered from the highest levels of available published evidence, pharmaceutical companies, and professional opinions. The performance scores were analyzed using the additive model. The end values were then deliberated by an expert committee. Results. A total of eight main criteria and seven subcriteria were determined by the stakeholders. The economic criterion was weighted at 30%. Among the noneconomic criteria, “patient suitability” was weighted the highest. Based on the MCDA outputs, the expert committee recommended one potential medicine (out of three; 33%) be added to the MOHMF and one existing medicine (out of 24; 4%) be removed/delisted from the MOHMF. The other existing medicines remained unchanged. Conclusions. Although this framework was useful for deciding to add new medicines to the formulary, it appears to be less functional and impactful for the removal/delisting existing medicines from the MOHMF. The generalizability of this conclusion to other formulations remains to be confirmed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document