scholarly journals Postoperative complications following open repair of complete Achilles tendon rupture performed by orthopaedic trainee surgeons

Injury Extra ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 211
Author(s):  
Shakir Syed ◽  
Riazuddin Mohammed ◽  
Aun Mirza
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Orthopaedic Trainee

Mini-open Repair for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: Ring Forceps vs the Achillon Device

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652110444
Author(s):  
Chul Hyun Park ◽  
Hongfei Yan ◽  
Jeongjin Park ◽  
Min Cheol Chang
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Plantar Flexion ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Maximum Height ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mini Open

Background: Repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture using the Achillon device is a representative mini-open repair technique; however, the limitations of this technique include the need for special instruments and decreased repair strength. A modified mini-open repair using ring forceps might overcome these limitations. Purpose: To compare the Achillon device with ring forceps in mini-open repairs of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Fifty patients (41 men and 9 women) with acute Achilles tendon rupture on 1 foot were consecutively treated using mini-open repair techniques. The first 20 patients were treated using the Achillon device (Achillon group), and the subsequent 30 were treated using a ring forceps (forceps group). Clinical, functional, and isokinetic results and postoperative complications were compared between the groups at the last follow-up. Clinical evaluations were performed using the AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society) score, Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score, length of incision, and operation time. Functional evaluations included active range of motion of the ankle joint, maximum calf circumference, hopping test, and single-limb heel rise (SLHR). Isokinetic evaluations were performed using the isokinetic test for ankle plantar flexion. Results: The AOFAS score ( P = .669), Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score ( P = .753), and length of incision ( P = .305) were not significantly different between the groups (mean ± SD, 90.1 ± 8.7, 88.3 ± 9.9, and 2.7 ± 0.3 cm in the Achillon group vs 92.2 ± 9.4, 89.9 ± 10.9, and 2.5 ± 0.4 cm in the forceps group, respectively). Operation times in the Achillon group were significantly shorter than those in the forceps group (41.4 ± 9.6 vs 62.8 ± 14.1 minutes, P < .001). The maximum height of the SLHR ( P = .042) and the number of SLHRs ( P = .043) in the forceps group (79.7% ± 7.4% and 72.9% ± 10.2%) were significantly greater than those in the Achillon group (75.3% ± 7.1% and 66.7% ± 11.0%). No significant differences were detected between the groups in mean peak torques for plantar flexion at angular speeds of 30 deg/s ( P = .185) and 120 deg/s ( P = .271). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of postoperative complications between the groups ( P = .093). Conclusion: The ring forceps technique is comparable to the Achillon technique with respect to clinical, functional, and isokinetic results and postoperative complications. Given that no special instrument is required, the ring forceps technique could be a better option for acute Achilles tendon rupture repair.

scholarly journals The Influence of Diabetes on Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0028
Author(s):  
Jonathan Kaplan ◽  
Jeffery Hillam ◽  
Amiethab Aiyer ◽  
Niall Smyth
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Power Analysis ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Surgical Repair ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
The United States ◽  
Foot And Ankle ◽  
Tendon Ruptures

Category: Sports Introduction/Purpose: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is an epidemic affecting millions of individuals in the United States. Multiple studies have demonstrated an increase in complications in foot and ankle surgery in patients with DM, including wound healing complications, surgical site infections (SSI), or surgical failure. The goal of this study was to retrospectively review outcomes data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) to determine the impact of DM on operative treatment of achilles tendon ruptures. Methods: Using the NSQIP from 2006-2015, patients were identified using common procedure terminology (CPT) for Achilles tendon ruptures. Diabetic and non-diabetic cohorts were evaluated to compare demographics, comorbidities, perioperative details and 30-day outcomes. Statistical evaluation included a power analysis for the primary outcome measure of wound disruption as well as univariate analysis was performed using chi-squared or Fisher’s exact and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results: A total of 2,014 patients were identified having sustained an Achilles tendon rupture. There were 1,981 patients without DM and 33 patients with DM. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications, including SSI, medical complications, and 30-day outcomes between patients with DM and non-DM patients undergoing surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. The power analysis for wound disruption showed a P=0.9 with an alpha of 0.05, sample size of n=2014, and Pearson correlation coefficient of r=0.0721 Conclusion: While DM has been shown to have an increase in complications in various foot and ankle procedures, this study demonstrates that there is no significant difference in postoperative complications and 30-day outcomes between patients with DM and non-DM patients undergoing surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures using the NSQIP database from 2006-2015. Based on this data, patients with diabetes mellitus can be considered adequate surgical candidates for acute Achilles tendon rupture repair.

Postoperative Complications Following Repair of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 679-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. J. Ruben Stavenuiter ◽  
Bart Lubberts ◽  
Robert M. Prince ◽  
A. Holly Johnson ◽  
Christopher W. DiGiovanni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Postoperative Complication ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Subspecialty Training ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Operative Repair ◽  
Trauma Surgeons

Background: Controversy remains regarding which patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture would best be treated nonoperatively and which might benefit from operative repair. The primary aim of this study was to characterize the overall incidence of—and specific risk factors associated with—postoperative complications that follow operative repair. We also evaluated the specific differences between complications after the use of an open or minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approach. Methods: Retrospective chart review identified 615 adult patients who underwent operative repair for an acute Achilles tendon rupture between January 1, 2001, and May 1, 2016, at 3 level I trauma centers. Minimum follow-up was 3 months. Patient demographics, comorbidities, injury mechanism, procedural details, and surgeon subspecialty were collected. Assessed complications included wound healing issues, rerupture, hematoma, nerve injury, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism. Results: Seventy-two patients (11.7%) developed a postoperative complication. Risk factors included advancing patient age (odds ratio [OR], 1.04, P = .007), active tobacco use (OR, 3.20, P = .007), and specific subspecialty training (OR, 2.04, P = .046). No difference in overall complication rate was found between the open and MIS approaches (11.6% vs 13.2%, P = .658). A subgroup analysis among orthopedic subspecialties demonstrated that patients treated by trauma surgeons had increased rates of wound complication ( P = .043) and rerupture ( P = .025) compared with those treated by other subspecialties. Patients treated by trauma surgeons were also more likely to be younger or have a body mass index (BMI) > 30, although neither factor was found to be independently predictive for postoperative complications. Conclusion: Approximately 1 in 9 patients undergoing operative repair of an acute Achilles tendon rupture developed a postoperative complication. Advancing age and active tobacco use were independent risk factors for developing such complications. Differences in subspecialty training also appear to impact complication rates, but the potential reason for this discrepancy remains unclear. As controversy remains regarding which patients who sustain acute Achilles tendon rupture should be treated nonoperatively and which would benefit most from surgical repair, a better understanding of postoperative complication rates and associated risk factors may enhance the decision-making processes in treating these injuries. It is not clear whether MIS techniques are superior to traditional open repair in terms of postoperative complications. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative series.

Functional Outcomes Of Primary Open Repair With Augmentation And Without Augmentation In Achilles Tendon Rupture

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 446
Author(s):  
YILMAZ ERGISI ◽  
GULCAN HARPUT ◽  
BURAK ULUSOY ◽  
HAKAN SELEK ◽  
HAMZA OZER ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture

One-Step Approach for Infections After Achilles Tendon Open Repair: The Distally Based Peroneus Brevis Muscle Flap

2020 ◽  
pp. 153473462095154
Author(s):  
Luca Vaienti ◽  
Giuseppe Cottone ◽  
Giovanna Zaccaria ◽  
Emanuele Rampino Cordaro ◽  
Francesco Amendola
Keyword(s):  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Muscle Flap ◽  
Full Weight Bearing ◽  
Peroneus Brevis ◽  
Distally Based

The aim of this single-center, retrospective study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of distally based peroneus brevis muscle flap as first therapeutic option for infections after Achilles tendon open repair. We retrospectively analyzed 14 consecutive patients with complete Achilles tendon rupture and developing surgical site infection after an attempt of open surgical repair. Every patient was reconstructed with distally base peroneus brevis muscle flap. The primary outcome was the return to work and the initiation of full weight-bearing. Secondary outcomes were complication rate and time needed to return to work. A review of the literature was conducted to better define the actual standard treatment. Each patient returned to work. No flap necrosis occurred. Two minor healing delays and one hematoma were reported. Median time to wound healing was 17 days (interquartile range [IQR] = 13-20). Median time to full weight-bearing was 52 days (IQR = 47-55). Median follow-up (FU) was 21 months. Distally based peroneus brevis flap is a safe treatment for surgical site infections after Achilles tendon rupture repair. Patients regained full weight-bearing after a median time of 52 days from the surgical reconstruction. No major complications were observed. This flap clearly emerges as first reconstructive option for complications after surgery of Achilles tendon region.

Percutaneous versus Open Repair of the Ruptured Achilles Tendon

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 1369-1379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrej Čretnik ◽  
Miloš Kosanović ◽  
Vladimir Smrkolj
Keyword(s):  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Tendon Repair ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
American Orthopaedic

Background Controversy regarding the optimal treatment of the fresh total Achilles tendon rupture remains. Purpose To compare the results of percutaneous and open Achilles tendon repair. Study Design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods The results of 132 consecutive patients with acute complete Achilles tendon rupture who were operated on exclusively with modified percutaneous repair under local anesthesia from 1991 to 1997 and followed up for at least 2 years were compared to the results of 105 consecutive patients who were operated on exclusively with open repair under general or spinal anesthesia in the same period. Results There were significantly fewer major complications in the group of percutaneous repairs in comparison with the group of open repairs (4.5% vs 12.4%; P = .03), particularly necrosis (0% vs 5.6%; P = .019), and a lower total number of complications (9.7% vs 21%; P = .013). There were slightly more reruptures (3.7% vs 2.8%; P = .680) and sural nerve disturbances (4.5% vs 2.8%; P = .487) in the group of percutaneous repairs, with no statistically significant difference. Functional assessment using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scale and the Holz score showed no statistically significant difference. Conclusion The results of the study support the choice of (modified) percutaneous suturing under local anesthesia as the method that brings comparable functional results to open repair, with a significantly lower rate of complications.

scholarly journals Comparison of mini-open repair system and percutaneous repair for acute Achilles tendon rupture

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Li ◽  
Qiang Jiang ◽  
Hua Chen ◽  
Hongkui Xin ◽  
Qing He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Repair System ◽  
Percutaneous Repair ◽  
Repair Group ◽  
Mini Open

Abstract Background To reduce incision complications, minimally invasive operative approaches for treatment with acute Achilles tendon rupture have been developed, such as Mini-open repair and percutaneous repair. Which technique is the better surgical option? In the present study, we compared the two surgical procedures— modified Mini-open repair versus percutaneous repair—in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Methods From January 2016 to November 2018, 68 matched patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture were divided into treatment group (Mini-open with modified Ma-Griffith technique) and control group (the Ma–Griffith technique). The patients were then treated with different surgical techniques and followed up for no less than 24 months, and the functional outcome scores and complications were retrospectively evaluated. Results The mean follow-up time in Mini-open repair group was 29.0±2.9 months, and that in control group was 27.9±2.9 months (P=0.147). The Mini-open repair group showed reliably higher American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score and Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) than the control group in functional assessment (95.0±3.8 vs. 92.3±5.3, P=0.000; 93.8±3.8 vs. 90.9±4.5,P=0.000). There was no cases of sural nerve injury in Mini-open repair group, whereas the percutaneous repair group had 5 cases of the same (P=0.027). No significant differences were found in the calf circumference (32.3±3.9 vs. 31.8±3.6) (P=0.564), range of motion of the ankle (51.3±4.8 vs. 50.5±4.2, P=0.362), or wound complications (34/0 vs. 34/0) (P=1.000) between the two groups at the end of the follow-up time. However, the percutaneous repair group had a shorter average operating time (23.1±5.2 min) than that of the Mini-open repair group (27.7±4.3 min) (P=0.000). Conclusions Acute Achilles tendon ruptures may be treated successfully with a new Mini-open repair system or percutaneous repair technique. However, the Mini-open repair system may represent a superior surgical option, since it offers advantages in terms of direct visual control of the repair, AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Score, Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score and risk of sural nerve palsy. Study design Case-control studies, Level of evidence, 3.

Arthroscopic, Single-Incision, and Double-Incision Approaches to Flexor Hallucis Longus Tendon Transfer Following Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 111 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley V. Mosseri ◽  
Phillip Calaj ◽  
Dominick J. Casciato ◽  
Bibi N. Singh
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Achilles Tendon ◽  
Tendon Transfer ◽  
Tendon Rupture ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Achilles Tendon Rupture ◽  
Athletic Injury ◽  
Flexor Hallucis Longus ◽  
Longus Tendon ◽  
Significant Difference

Achilles tendon rupture is a common athletic injury that results in a painful and antalgic gait. Flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer through arthroscopic, single-incision, or double-incision techniques is used as a treatment approach to address this rupture; however, no studies have compared postoperative complications between these three techniques. A systematic search of published articles was conducted using keywords “Achilles rupture,” “flexor hallucis tendon,” “transfer,” and “recovery.” Articles were then selected based on their title, abstract, and content following full-text review. From each article's reported surgical outcomes, a comparison was made between arthroscopic and single- and double-incision postoperative complications using a χ2 test with significance set at a value of P &lt; .05 followed by post hoc analysis. The arthroscopic approach maintained the lowest rate of postoperative complications, followed by the single- and double-incision techniques. A significant difference in the number of postoperative complications was found between all incisional approaches. The pairwise comparisons, however, could not identify which incisional approaches significantly differed between each other. A reduction in postoperative complications places arthroscopy and the single-incision techniques as the preferred approaches for flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer following an Achilles tendon rupture. Although current literature shows arthroscopy to be superior to single- and double-incision methods, this review demonstrates the need for a greater number of published cases using arthroscopy to establish significance regarding postoperative complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document