Use of Ganga Hospital Open Injury Severity Scoring for determination of salvage versus amputation in open type IIIB injuries of lower limbs in children—An analysis of 52 type IIIB open fractures

Injury ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (11) ◽  
pp. 2509-2514 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Venkatadass ◽  
Tarani Sai Prasanth Grandhi ◽  
S. Rajasekaran
Phlebologie ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 37 (05) ◽  
pp. 247-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. S. Brauer ◽  
W. J. Brauer

SummaryPurpose: Comparison of qualitative and quantitative sonography with the lymphoscintigraphic function test and clinical findings in legs. Patients, methods: In 33 patients a lymphoscintigraphic function test of legs combined with measurement of lymph node uptake was performed and subsequently compared with sonography. Sonographic criteria were: Thickness of cutis, thickness of subcutanean fatty tissue and presence of liquid structures or fine disperse tissue structure of lower limbs, foots and toes. Results: In 51 legs uptake values lie in the pathologic area, in four legs in the grey area and in ten legs in the normal area. The cutis thickness in the lower leg shows no significant correlation with the uptake. The determination of the thickness of the subcutanean fatty tissue of the lower leg and of the cutis thickness of the feet turned out to be an unreliable method. In 47% of the medial lower legs and in 57% of the lateral lower legs with clinical lymphoedema sonography is falsely negative. Conclusion: Early lymphoedema is only detectable with the lymphoscintigraphic function test. In the case of clinical lymphoedema clinical examination is more reliable than sonography.


2019 ◽  
pp. 17-22
Author(s):  
Luis Fernando Spagnuolo Brunello ◽  
Phillipe Abreu ◽  
Gustavo Justo Schulz ◽  
Flavio Saavedra Tomasich ◽  
Jonathan Meizoso ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoungwon Jung ◽  
John Cook-Jong Lee ◽  
Rae Woong Park ◽  
Dukyong Yoon ◽  
Sungjae Jung ◽  
...  

1983 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Farisse ◽  
J. Bonnoit ◽  
B. Seriat-Gautier ◽  
C. Brunet ◽  
N. Daon ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002110407
Author(s):  
Samuel Morgan ◽  
Ofer Sadovnic ◽  
Moshe Iluz ◽  
Simon Garceau ◽  
Nisan Amzallag ◽  
...  

Background: Femoral anteversion is a major contributor to functionality of the hip joint and is implicated in many joint pathologies. Accurate determination of component version intraoperatively is a technically challenging process that relies on the visual estimation of the surgeon. The following study aimed to examine whether the walls of the femoral neck can be used as appropriate landmarks to ensure appropriate femoral prosthesis version intraoperatively. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study based on 32 patients (64 hips) admitted to our centre between July and September 2020 who had undergone a CT scan of their lower limbs. Through radiological imaging analysis, the following measurements were performed bilaterally for each patient: anterior wall version, posterior wall version, and mid-neck femoral version. Anterior and posterior wall version were compared and evaluated relative to mid-neck version, which represented the true version value. Results: Mean anterior wall anteversion was 20° (95% CI, 17.6–22.8°) and mean posterior wall anteversion was −12° (95% CI, −15 to −9.7°). The anterior walls of the femoral neck had a constant of −7 and a coefficient of 0.9 (95% CI, −9.8 to −4.2; p  < 0.0001; R2 0.77). The posterior walls of the femoral neck had a constant of 20 and a coefficient of 0.7 (95% CI, 17.8–22.5; p  < 0.0001; R2 0.60). Conclusions: Surgeons can accurately obtain femoral anteversion by subtracting 7° from the angle taken between the anterior wall and the posterior femoral condyles or by adding 20° to the angle taken between the posterior wall and the posterior femoral condyles.


Author(s):  
Hideo Tohira ◽  
Ian Jacobs ◽  
David Mountain ◽  
Nick Gibson ◽  
Allen Yeo

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (9) ◽  
pp. 1797-1804
Author(s):  
Abhishek Gupta ◽  
Sunny Parikh ◽  
Raja Bhaskara Rajasekaran ◽  
Jayaramaraju Dheenadhayalan ◽  
Agraharam Devendra ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document