Background: Active (new/enlarging) T2 lesion counts are routinely used in the clinical management of multiple sclerosis. Thus, automated tools able to accurately identify active T2 lesions would be of high interest to neuroradiologists for assisting in their clinical activity. Objective: To compare the accuracy in detecting active T2 lesions and of radiologically active patients based on different visual and automated methods. Methods: One hundred multiple sclerosis patients underwent two magnetic resonance imaging examinations within 12 months. Four approaches were assessed for detecting active T2 lesions: (1) conventional neuroradiological reports; (2) prospective visual analyses performed by an expert; (3) automated unsupervised tool; and (4) supervised convolutional neural network. As a gold standard, a reference outcome was created by the consensus of two observers. Results: The automated methods detected a higher number of active T2 lesions, and a higher number of active patients, but a higher number of false-positive active patients than visual methods. The convolutional neural network model was more sensitive in detecting active T2 lesions and active patients than the other automated method. Conclusion: Automated convolutional neural network models show potential as an aid to neuroradiological assessment in clinical practice, although visual supervision of the outcomes is still required.
Assessment of automatic decision-support systems for detecting active T2 lesions in multiple sclerosis patients
