scholarly journals Survival Differences in Clinical Trials With Long-Term Follow-Up

2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (5) ◽  
pp. 600
Author(s):  
William J. Kostis ◽  
Abel E. Moreyra ◽  
Javier Cabrera ◽  
John B. Kostis
2021 ◽  
pp. 135245852110002
Author(s):  
Bruce AC Cree ◽  
Jeffrey A Cohen ◽  
Anthony T Reder ◽  
Davorka Tomic ◽  
Diego Silva ◽  
...  

Background: Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) can reduce the risk of disability worsening in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS). High-efficacy DMTs can lead to confirmed or sustained disability improvement (CDI and SDI). Objective and Methods: Post hoc analyses of data from the TRANSFORMS, FREEDOMS, and FREEDOMS II trials and their extensions assessed the effects of fingolimod (0.5–1.25 mg/day) on stabilizing or improving disability over ⩽8 years in participants with RMS. CDI and SDI rates were compared between participants initially randomized to fingolimod, interferon (IFNβ-1a), or placebo. Results: At 8 years’ follow-up in TRANSFORMS, 35.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.2%–43.1%) of assessed participants in the IFNβ-1a–fingolimod switch group and 41.9% (36.6%–47.6%) on continuous fingolimod experienced CDI; disability did not worsen in approximately 70%. Similar results were seen in the combined FREEDOMS population. Proportionally fewer TRANSFORMS participants achieved SDI in the IFNβ-1a–fingolimod switch group than on continuous fingolimod (5.4% [3.0%–9.5%] vs 14.2% [10.8%–18.4%], p = 0.01). Conclusion: CDI and SDI are outcomes of interest for clinical trials and for long-term follow-up of participants with RMS. Monitoring CDI and SDI in addition to disability worsening may facilitate understanding of the therapeutic benefit of RMS treatments.


2000 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. A566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen B. Hanauer ◽  
Thomas F. Schaible ◽  
Kimberly L. DeWoody ◽  
Paul A. Marsters ◽  
Marilyn Peltier ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 263300402110588
Author(s):  
Courtney D. Thornburg

The treatment landscape for hemophilia has been rapidly changing with introduction of novel therapies. Gene therapy for hemophilia is a promising therapeutic option for sustained endogenous factor production to mitigate the need for prophylactic treatment to prevent spontaneous and traumatic bleeding. Etranacogene dezaparvovec is an investigational factor IX (FIX) gene transfer product that utilizes the adeno-associated virus (AAV) 5 vector with a liver-specific promoter and a hyperactive FIX transgene. Here, the development of etranacogene dezaparvovec and available efficacy and safety data from clinical trials are reviewed. Overall, etranacogene dezaparvovec provides sustained FIX expression for more than 2 years and allows for a bleed and infusion-free life in the majority of patients. Safety, efficacy, and quality-of-life data will inform shared decision-making for patients who are considering gene therapy. Long-term follow-up regarding duration of expression and safety are crucial. Plain Language Summary Factor IX Padua gene therapy to boost clotting factor and prevent bleeding for people living with hemophilia B People living with hemophilia have low or missing clotting factor, which can lead to bleeding that is unexpected or caused by a traumatic event (such as a sports injury or surgery). There are two main types of hemophilia: clotting factor (F)VIII deficiency (known as hemophilia A) and FIX deficiency (known as hemophilia B). People living with the severe or moderately severe forms of hemophilia (clotting factor levels below 3% of normal) need regular treatment, typically by infusions into the vein, to stop or prevent bleeding and damage to their joints. Gene therapy is currently being investigated as a new treatment option that introduces a working copy of the clotting factor gene to the liver. Following treatment, clotting factor is produced by the liver. Etranacogene dezaparvovec [Et-ra-na-co-gene dez-a-par-vo-vec] is a form of gene therapy for people living with hemophilia B. This form of gene therapy includes a modified form of FIX (FIX Padua) which produces high levels of FIX activity compared with normal FIX. It is being tested to see whether individuals will have low rates of bleeding and not need to treat themselves with clotting factor. In the clinical trials, participants with FIX levels below 2% (of normal) receive a single gene therapy infusion. The results of the trials have so far shown that patients given etranacogene dezaparvovec have continuous production of FIX, whereby they have reported much less bleeding and factor treatment. Questions relating to the safety of the gene therapy and how long it works will hopefully be answered through long-term follow-up of the patients once the trials are completed.


BJGP Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. bjgpopen20X101069 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kome Gbinigie ◽  
Kerstin Frie

BackgroundOn the 11 March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared that COVID-19 was a pandemic. To date, there are no medical treatments for COVID-19 with proven effectiveness. Novel treatments and/or vaccines will take time to be developed and distributed to patients. In light of this, there has been growing interest in the use of existing medications, such as chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), as potential treatments of this disease.AimTo establish the current evidence for the effectiveness of CQ and HCQ in treating COVID-19.Design & settingA rapid review of the literature was conducted.MethodElectronic searches in PubMed and Google Scholar were conducted on 21 March 2020. A further search was conducted in Google for relevant literature on 28 March 2020.ResultsThere is limited evidence of in vitro activity of CQ/HCQ against SARS-CoV-2. A number of in vivo clinical trials are underway. The empirical data available from two of these trials reveal conflicting results. Both trials are characterised by small numbers of participants (n = 30 and n = 36) and suffer methodological limitations. No medium or long-term follow-up data is available.ConclusionAt present, there is insufficient evidence to determine whether CQ/HCQ are safe and effective treatments for COVID-19. High quality, adequately powered randomised clinical trials in primary and secondary care settings are urgently required to guide policymakers and clinicians. These studies should report medium- and long-term follow-up results, and safety data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document