Therapeutic Advances in Rare Disease
Latest Publications


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

22
(FIVE YEARS 16)

H-INDEX

0
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Published By SAGE Publications

2633-0040, 2633-0040

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 263300402110588
Author(s):  
Courtney D. Thornburg

The treatment landscape for hemophilia has been rapidly changing with introduction of novel therapies. Gene therapy for hemophilia is a promising therapeutic option for sustained endogenous factor production to mitigate the need for prophylactic treatment to prevent spontaneous and traumatic bleeding. Etranacogene dezaparvovec is an investigational factor IX (FIX) gene transfer product that utilizes the adeno-associated virus (AAV) 5 vector with a liver-specific promoter and a hyperactive FIX transgene. Here, the development of etranacogene dezaparvovec and available efficacy and safety data from clinical trials are reviewed. Overall, etranacogene dezaparvovec provides sustained FIX expression for more than 2 years and allows for a bleed and infusion-free life in the majority of patients. Safety, efficacy, and quality-of-life data will inform shared decision-making for patients who are considering gene therapy. Long-term follow-up regarding duration of expression and safety are crucial. Plain Language Summary Factor IX Padua gene therapy to boost clotting factor and prevent bleeding for people living with hemophilia B People living with hemophilia have low or missing clotting factor, which can lead to bleeding that is unexpected or caused by a traumatic event (such as a sports injury or surgery). There are two main types of hemophilia: clotting factor (F)VIII deficiency (known as hemophilia A) and FIX deficiency (known as hemophilia B). People living with the severe or moderately severe forms of hemophilia (clotting factor levels below 3% of normal) need regular treatment, typically by infusions into the vein, to stop or prevent bleeding and damage to their joints. Gene therapy is currently being investigated as a new treatment option that introduces a working copy of the clotting factor gene to the liver. Following treatment, clotting factor is produced by the liver. Etranacogene dezaparvovec [Et-ra-na-co-gene dez-a-par-vo-vec] is a form of gene therapy for people living with hemophilia B. This form of gene therapy includes a modified form of FIX (FIX Padua) which produces high levels of FIX activity compared with normal FIX. It is being tested to see whether individuals will have low rates of bleeding and not need to treat themselves with clotting factor. In the clinical trials, participants with FIX levels below 2% (of normal) receive a single gene therapy infusion. The results of the trials have so far shown that patients given etranacogene dezaparvovec have continuous production of FIX, whereby they have reported much less bleeding and factor treatment. Questions relating to the safety of the gene therapy and how long it works will hopefully be answered through long-term follow-up of the patients once the trials are completed.



2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 263300402199744
Author(s):  
Philippa Harding ◽  
Dulce Lima Cunha ◽  
Mariya Moosajee

Microphthalmia is a rare developmental eye disorder affecting 1 in 7000 births. It is defined as a small (axial length ⩾2 standard deviations below the age-adjusted mean) underdeveloped eye, caused by disruption of ocular development through genetic or environmental factors in the first trimester of pregnancy. Clinical phenotypic heterogeneity exists amongst patients with varying levels of severity, and associated ocular and systemic features. Up to 11% of blind children are reported to have microphthalmia, yet currently no treatments are available. By identifying the aetiology of microphthalmia and understanding how the mechanisms of eye development are disrupted, we can gain a better understanding of the pathogenesis. Animal models, mainly mouse, zebrafish and Xenopus, have provided extensive information on the genetic regulation of oculogenesis, and how perturbation of these pathways leads to microphthalmia. However, differences exist between species, hence cellular models, such as patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) optic vesicles, are now being used to provide greater insights into the human disease process. Progress in 3D cellular modelling techniques has enhanced the ability of researchers to study interactions of different cell types during eye development. Through improved molecular knowledge of microphthalmia, preventative or postnatal therapies may be developed, together with establishing genotype–phenotype correlations in order to provide patients with the appropriate prognosis, multidisciplinary care and informed genetic counselling. This review summarises some key discoveries from animal and cellular models of microphthalmia and discusses how innovative new models can be used to further our understanding in the future.Plain language summaryAnimal and Cellular Models of the Eye Disorder, Microphthalmia (Small Eye) Microphthalmia, meaning a small, underdeveloped eye, is a rare disorder that children are born with. Genetic changes or variations in the environment during the first 3 months of pregnancy can disrupt early development of the eye, resulting in microphthalmia. Up to 11% of blind children have microphthalmia, yet currently no treatments are available. By understanding the genes necessary for eye development, we can determine how disruption by genetic changes or environmental factors can cause this condition. This helps us understand why microphthalmia occurs, and ensure patients are provided with the appropriate clinical care and genetic counselling advice. Additionally, by understanding the causes of microphthalmia, researchers can develop treatments to prevent or reduce the severity of this condition. Animal models, particularly mice, zebrafish and frogs, which can also develop small eyes due to the same genetic/environmental changes, have helped us understand the genes which are important for eye development and can cause birth eye defects when disrupted. Studying a patient’s own cells grown in the laboratory can further help researchers understand how changes in genes affect their function. Both animal and cellular models can be used to develop and test new drugs, which could provide treatment options for patients living with microphthalmia. This review summarises the key discoveries from animal and cellular models of microphthalmia and discusses how innovative new models can be used to further our understanding in the future.



2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 263300402110099
Author(s):  
William Frank Mawalla ◽  
Hamisa Iddy ◽  
Christine Aloyce Kindole ◽  
Ahlam Nasser ◽  
Anna Schuh

Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome (WAS) is a rare immunodeficiency X-linked genetic disorder. It is often featured with a clinical triad of thrombocytopenia with low mean platelet volume, eczematoid dermatitis and recurrent infections. The clinical manifestation of WAS, depending on the underlying variant, shows wide heterogeneity. We present a case of a 10-month-old boy who came in with a history of recurrent fever, skin lesions since birth and episodes of bloody diarrhoea. He had severe anaemia and thrombocytopenia (with normal mean platelet volume). Genetic analysis revealed the patient to be hemizygous for a pathogenic WAS gene splice variant (NM_000377.2:c.360+1G>A). He was managed with supportive treatment and regular follow up, but died 4 months later. As it is a rare genetic disease, the diagnosis of WAS can easily be missed, especially in settings with scarce healthcare resources that do not have easy access to genetic testing. Thus, a high index of suspicion is needed when a male child presents with recurrent infections and bleeding tendencies. Plain language summary Management challenges of a rare genetic disorder in a resource-limited country: a case report of Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome in Tanzania Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome (WAS) is a rare inherited disease that mainly affects boys. Patients will typically present with low levels of a single line of little particles of cells that clot the blood called platelets, whole-body skin rashes and recurrent infections. Nevertheless, the clinical presentation can vary between individuals. We present a case of a 10-month-old boy who came in with a history of recurrent fever, skin rash since birth and episodes of bloody diarrhoea. He had very low levels of red blood cells and platelets. Genetic analysis confirmed the patient to have WAS. He was managed with supportive treatment, followed up on a regular clinic but unfortunately died 4 months later. Being a rare genetic disease, the diagnosis of WAS can easily be missed, especially in regions with scarce healthcare resources that do not have easy access to genetic testing. Thus, doctors should suspect WAS in boys presenting with recurrent infections and bleeding problems.



2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 263300402199871
Author(s):  
Jay E Self ◽  
Helena Lee

Nystagmus is a disorder characterised by uncontrolled, repetitive, to-and-fro movement of the eyes. It can occur as a seemingly isolated disorder but is most commonly the first, or most obvious, feature in a host of ophthalmic and systemic disorders. The number of underlying causes is vast, and recent improvements in the provision of genetic testing have shown that many conditions can include nystagmus as a feature, but that phenotypes overlap significantly. Therefore, an increase in the understanding of the genetic causes of nystagmus has shown that successful novel therapeutics for ‘nystagmus’ can target either specific underlying disorders and mechanisms (aiming to treat the underlying condition as a whole), or a final common pathway (aiming to treat the nystagmus directly). Plain language summary Novel treatments for a disorder of eye movement (nystagmus): what has the genetics taught us so far? Nystagmus is a disorder of eye movement characterised by uncontrolled, to-and-fro movements. It can occur as an isolated disorder, in conditions affecting other parts of the eye, in conditions affecting multiple other parts of the body or secondary to neurological diseases (brain diseases). In recent years, advances in genetic testing methods and increase in genetic testing in healthcare systems have provided a greater understanding of the underlying causes of nystagmus. They have highlighted the bewildering number of genetic causes that can result in what looks like a very similar eye movement disorder. In recent years, new classes of drugs have been developed for some of the causes of nystagmus, and some new drugs have been developed for other conditions which have the potential to work in certain types of nystagmus. For these reasons, genetics has taught us that identifying new possible treatments for nystagmus can either be dependent on identifying the underlying genetic cause and aiming to treat that, or aiming to treat the nystagmus per se by targeting a final common pathway. A toolkit based on specific treatments for specific conditions is more to have meaningful impact on ‘nystagmus’ than pursuing a panacea based on a ‘one size fits all’ approach.



2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 263300402110269
Author(s):  
Aamir Bashir ◽  
Pramil Tiwari ◽  
Ajay Duseja

Background: Lysosomal acid lipase deficiency (LAL-D) is a very rare genetic abnormality caused by LIPA gene mutation. The disease has two distinct clinical variants in humans: Wolman disease in infants and cholesteryl ester storage disease in children and adults. Both conditions are characterized by elevated serum transaminases, dyslipidaemia, severe liver steatosis and accelerated fibrosis or cirrhosis, contributing to its high rate of early mortality. Recently sebelipase alfa (recombinant human LAL) was launched to address its underlying pathology. This systematic review evaluates the safety and efficacy of sebelipase alfa for LAL-D. Methods: This systematic review was performed following the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Clinical trial records were systematically searched in PubMed/Medline, ClinicalTrials.gov ., Cochrane Library and Google Scholar up to September 2020. Records that have reported at least one of the included outcomes were included. Baseline and endpoint mean and standard deviation (SD) for all outcomes were recorded. For safety, frequency and overall distribution of different adverse events were included. Results: A total of seven records from five individual studies with 110 LAL-D patients were included into this study. The mean age ranged from 2.57 months in infants to 31.6 years among adults. Serum transaminases (alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase), serum lipids (total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol), gamma-glutamyl transferase and liver volume were included as efficacy outcomes. Final pooled results were synthesized as a change from baseline to end of the treatment. A significant effect on both serum transaminases and other serum lipid was achieved ( p < 0.01), while non-significant differences were seen for GGT and liver volume as p = 0.35 and p = 0.08 was observed. Mostly the adverse events related to the infusions were infrequent and mild-to-moderate in severity. Conclusion: Sebelipase alfa as an enzyme replacement provides an effective, safe and well tolerated treatment in both variants of LAL-D. Plain language summary A systematic literature review on safety and efficacy of enzyme replacement therapy in lysosomal acid lipase deficiency Lysosomal acid lipase deficiency (LAL-D) is a rare, progressive, genetic disorder caused by functional mutations in the LIPA gene, which encodes LAL enzyme. This enzyme maintains lipid homeostasis by hydrolysing the cholesterol esters and triglycerides. Patients with deficient LAL activity are seen with abnormal liver functions which keep them at a high risk of early mortality. Clinical diagnosis of this disease is very challenging due to both its low prevalence and low awareness among patients/clinicians and additionally due to its overlap with other liver/lipid disorders. Also, owing to lack of safe and effective treatment, dietary modifications and some lipid modifying drugs are usually used to control the LAL-D manifestations. Recently, recombinant human LAL named as sebelipase alfa (Kanuma™, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., New Haven, Connecticut, USA) was approved in 2015 for the European Union and subsequently in the United States as an enzyme replacement therapy for LAL deficiency. The initial clinical trial data indicate that sebelipase alfa produces a significant improvement in all of the wide range of LAL-D manifestations. However, the cumulative evidence is not reported regarding its safety and effective use. Therefore, a systematic literature review of all the clinical trial records by following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines was undertaken. From all of the available clinical trial records, 110 LAL-D patients treated with sebelipase alfa were included. Serum transaminases, serum lipids, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) and liver volume were included as efficacy outcomes. Final pooled results were synthesized as a change from baseline to end of the treatment. A significant effect on both serum transaminases and other serum lipids was achieved ( p < 0.01), while non-significant differences were observed for GGT and liver volume, with p = 0.35 and p = 0.08 respectively. Mostly the adverse events related to the infusions were infrequent and mild-to-moderate in severity. The enzyme replacement provides an effective, safe and well tolerated treatment in both variants of LAL-D.



2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 263300402110472
Author(s):  
Laurence Woollard ◽  
Richard Gorman ◽  
Dakota J. Rosenfelt

Adeno-associated virus-based gene therapy points to a coming transformation in the treatment of people living with haemophilia, promising sustained bleed control and potential improvement in quality of life. Nevertheless, the consequences of introducing new genetic material are not trivial. The perceived benefits should not minimise the challenges facing patients in understanding the long-term risks and providing a valid and meaningful informed consent, whether in a research or clinical setting. Informed consent is a fundamentally important doctrine in both medical ethics and health law, upholding an individual’s right to define their personal goals and make their own autonomous choices. Patients should be enabled to recognise their clinical situation, understand the implications of treatment and integrate every facet of their life into their decision. This review describes informed consent processes for haemophilia gene therapy clinical trials, factors affecting patients’ decision making and the availability of patient-centred decision support interventions, to ensure that patients’ interests are being protected. Regulatory guidance has been published for physicians and manufacturers in haemophilia on informed consent, including for gene therapy, while best-practice recommendations for patient–physician discussions are available. In all settings, however, communicating and presenting highly technical and complex therapeutic information is challenging, especially where multiple barriers to scientific knowledge and health literacy exist. We propose several evidence-informed strategies to enhance the consent procedure, such as utilising validated literacy and knowledge assessment tools as well as participatory learning environments over an extended period, to ensure that patients are fully cognisant of the consent they give or deny. Further research is needed to define new, creative approaches for patient education and the upholding of ethical values in the informed consent process for gene therapy. The lessons learnt and approaches developed within haemophilia could set the gold standard for good practice in ensuring ethical preparedness amidst advances in genetic therapies. Plain language summary Improving the informed consent process for people living with haemophilia considering gene therapy. Gene therapy is the process of replacing faulty genes with healthy ones. In haemophilia, gene therapy involves introducing a working copy of the gene for the clotting factor that patients are missing. Following treatment, patients should begin producing their own clotting factor normally. However, people living with haemophilia (PwH) need to be fully informed regarding the potential benefits and risks of gene therapy and what this means for them, whether as part of a research study or routine medical care. Patients must be respected and supported to make decisions about their own health and wellbeing, recognising their legal and moral right to set personal goals and make treatment choices. For this to happen in practice, patients should be aware of their individual health needs, understand the effects of treatment and consider lifestyle preferences in relation to their decisions. This article attempts to describe how informed consent is obtained in haemophilia gene therapy clinical trials, what affects a patient’s ability to make decisions and the availability of information and support to respect and protect the interests of PwH. Regulators responsible for approving medical products have published guidance on informed consent for physicians and pharmaceutical manufacturers in haemophilia, including for gene therapy. Recommendations have been made about the best ways for PwH to discuss gene therapy with their physicians. Yet, poor communication of complex topics, such as gene therapy, can be problematic, especially if patients lack the skills and confidence to understand and discuss the science, or for physicians with limited time in clinic. We propose strategies to improve the consent process, so patients can feel more able to make informed decisions about new treatments. Further research is needed to find new, creative approaches for educating patients and ensuring that the informed consent process for gene therapy in haemophilia is ethical.



2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 263300402110207
Author(s):  
Suja Somanadhan ◽  
Hannah Bristow ◽  
Ellen Crushell ◽  
Gregory Pastores ◽  
Emma Nicholson ◽  
...  

Introduction: Disease trajectories are often uncertain among individuals living with mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) due to the progressive nature of the illness and the goal of care. This study investigated the impact on caregivers and care providers of children and adults living with MPS. Methods: The study used a cross-sectional design and a convenience sampling strategy which involved two sequential study components. The stage 1 quantitative component included three validated scales: the abbreviated World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF), the Paediatric Inventory for Parents (PIP) and the 14-item Resilience Scale (RS-14). The stage 2 qualitative component consisted of two focus groups with healthcare professionals (HCPs) ( n = 9) working with children and adults living with MPS across three clinical sites in Ireland. Data were collected between November 2017 and July 2019. Results: A total of 31 parents identified as caregivers participated in this study. The mean quality of life (QoL) score was 93.81, indicating a significantly high QoL. The PIP frequency total mean was 102.74 and difficulty mean 104.94. The mean score for the RS-14 was notably high, 81.42 out of a maximum of 98. The majority of the results showed high levels of concern for the future, with just under 50% finding themselves very often feeling scared that their child’s condition will deteriorate or that their child will die and finding these thoughts very difficult. The healthcare professionals’ (HCPs) perceptions were focused on the complexity of MPS, coping strategies, managing expectations and support services. Conclusion: The overall findings of the study reinforced the need for sustained and enhanced psychological support to ensure both families of children and adults living with MPS and the HCPs are supported in the continued delivery of quality patient care and outcomes. Subjective and objective measures from family caregivers and HCPs yield results that can decrease stress and improve psychological support. Plain language summary Impact of caregiving on families and healthcare professionals of children and adults living with mucopolysaccharidoses in Ireland Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) is a group of one of the many rare inherited metabolic disorders that come under category three of life-limiting conditions. Children born with this genetic condition show no change at birth, but effects start to show in subsequent years as it is a progressive disease. The severity of the condition varies according to the specific type, ranging from very mild symptoms to, in most cases, multisystemic, restricted growth or mental and physical disabilities. Recent developments in treatments for some forms of MPS have dramatically changed the quality of life (QoL) for patients. Other forms of treatment are currently under investigation and development. This study aimed to provide a detailed and reliable evidence base on the impact of caregiving for patients living with MPS on family caregivers and healthcare providers. Paper questionnaires were completed by the family caregivers of children and adults living with MPS. These three questionnaires focused on measuring QoL, parental stress and anxiety, and resilience among these families. Two focus group interviews were carried out with healthcare professionals working with children and adults living with MPS across three clinical sites in Ireland. A total of 31 parents completed the questionnaires in this study, indicating a significantly high QoL and notably high resilience. The majority of the parental stress results were related to concern for the future, with just half of the families finding themselves very often scared that their child’s condition will deteriorate or that their child will die and find these thoughts very difficult. The healthcare providers also spoke about the complexity of MPS, coping strategies, managing expectations and support services for the families of children and adults living with MPS. This study provided evidence for clinicians and policymakers to improve the availability of appropriate healthcare provisions for people living with MPS and their families.



2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 263300402110395
Author(s):  
Ratnakar Mishra ◽  
Benson S. Chen ◽  
Prachi Richa ◽  
Patrick Yu-Wai-Man

Wolfram Syndrome (WS) is an ultra-rare, progressive neurodegenerative disease characterized by early-onset diabetes mellitus and irreversible loss of vision, secondary to optic nerve degeneration. Visual loss in WS is an important cause of registrable blindness in children and young adults and the pathological hallmark is the preferential loss of retinal ganglion cells within the inner retina. In addition to optic atrophy, affected individuals frequently develop variable combinations of neurological, endocrinological, and psychiatric complications. The majority of patients carry recessive mutations in the WFS1 (4p16.1) gene that encodes for a multimeric transmembrane protein, wolframin, embedded within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). An increasingly recognised subgroup of patients harbor dominant WFS1 mutations that usually cause a milder phenotype, which can be limited to optic atrophy. Wolframin is a ubiquitous protein with high levels of expression in retinal, neuronal, and muscle tissues. It is a multifunctional protein that regulates a host of cellular functions, in particular the dynamic interaction with mitochondria at mitochondria-associated membranes. Wolframin has been implicated in several crucial cellular signaling pathways, including insulin signaling, calcium homeostasis, and the regulation of apoptosis and the ER stress response. There is currently no cure for WS; management remains largely supportive. This review will cover the clinical, genetic, and pathophysiological features of WS, with a specific focus on disease models and the molecular pathways that could serve as potential therapeutic targets. The current landscape of therapeutic options will also be discussed in the context of the latest evidence, including the pipeline for repurposed drugs and gene therapy. Plain language summary Wolfram syndrome – disease mechanisms and treatment options Wolfram syndrome (WS) is an ultra-rare genetic disease that causes diabetes mellitus and progressive loss of vision from early childhood. Vision is affected in WS because of damage to a specialized type of cells in the retina, known as retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), which converge at the back of the eye to form the optic nerve. The optic nerve is the fast-conducting cable that transmits visual information from the eye to the vision processing centers within the brain. As RGCs are lost, the optic nerve degenerates and it becomes pale in appearance (optic atrophy). Although diabetes mellitus and optic atrophy are the main features of WS, some patients can develop more severe problems because the brain and other organs, such as the kidneys and the bladder, are also affected. The majority of patients with WS carry spelling mistakes (mutations) in the WFS1 gene, which is located on the short arm of chromosome 4 (4p16.1). This gene is highly expressed in the eye and in the brain, and it encodes for a protein located within a compartment of the cell known as the endoplasmic reticulum. For reasons that still remain unclear, WFS1 mutations preferentially affect RGCs, accounting for the prominent visual loss in this genetic disorder. There is currently no effective treatment to halt or slow disease progression and management remains supportive, including the provision of visual aids and occupational rehabilitation. Research into WS has been limited by its relative rarity and the inability to get access to eye and brain tissues from affected patients. However, major advances in our understanding of this disease have been made recently by making use of more accessible cells from patients, such as skin cells (fibroblasts), or animal models, such as mice and zebrafish. This review summarizes the mechanisms by which WFS1 mutations affect cells, impairing their function and eventually leading to their premature loss. The possible treatment strategies to block these pathways are also discussed, with a particular focus on drug repurposing (i.e., using drugs that are already approved for other diseases) and gene therapy (i.e., replacing or repairing the defective WFS1 gene).



2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 263300402110385
Author(s):  
Jessica F. Scherr ◽  
Charles Albright ◽  
Emily de los Reyes

The COVID-19 pandemic transformed the delivery of healthcare across the world. Telehealth has emerged as the primary method for providing healthcare early in the pandemic. Patient and healthcare provider views of the effectiveness of telehealth services are encouraging and support the long-term use of telehealth services in clinical practice. Telehealth may provide a strategy that has far-reaching benefits for diverse patient populations, such as patients with Batten disease and other rare diseases, who face additional barriers to accessing subspecialty healthcare services. The aims of this paper, through the experience of a single Batten Disease Center of Excellence, are to (1) review the benefits and barriers involved in the delivery of telehealth services to patients with rare diseases; (2) discuss components of a model for clinical care that utilizes telehealth services for patients with Batten disease; (3) discuss limitations and future directions of using telehealth in patients with rare diseases. Healthcare systems should consider building clinical models that utilize telehealth services to provide multidisciplinary services to patients with rare diseases. There are numerous benefits in using telehealth that can enhance and expand service delivery between the patient and clinician. Telehealth services can also improve provider-to-provider communication and collaboration when providing clinical care to individuals with rare diseases. Although there are many benefits to utilizing telehealth services in provision of care to patients with rare diseases, it is important to consider factors that may limit or add additional barriers prior to implementing telehealth services. There is a need for future collaborative research to examine and compare the effectiveness and outcomes of telehealth services with standard of care services that are provided in-person. Future research should also examine how to reduce the challenges and barriers associated with the implementation of telehealth services. Plain language summary What is telehealth? Telehealth is defined by the US Department of Health Resources and Services Administrations1 as the “use of electronic information and telecommunication technologies to support long-distance clinical healthcare, patient and professional health-related education, public health, and health administration. Technologies include video conference, the internet, store-and-forward imaging, streaming media, and terrestrial and wireless communication.” What was the aim of this review? This review was conducted to guide a clinical model using telehealth services for patients with Batten disease and other rare diseases based on the experiences of a single Batten Disease Center of Excellence. Why is this important? Individuals with rare diseases may face multiple barriers to accessing clinical services. Local doctors and treatment providers, such as speech therapists, occupational therapists, physical therapists, and psychologists, may not have knowledge of rare diseases or how to manage symptoms and disease progression, or how to guide treatment services. Other barriers may also include: • Lack of local resources; • Increased caregiver stress; • Difficulty obtaining a correct diagnosis. There are numerous benefits to using telehealth services for both patients with rare diseases, such as: • Convenience; • Cost savings; • Improved access to care; • Ability to see multiple providers that can help with symptom monitoring, assessment, and treatment services. Where do we go from here? It is important to consider limitations when creating a model for clinical care for patients with rare diseases. Some limitations to think about are: • Clinician and organization familiarity with telehealth; • Reimbursement and coverage from insurance companies for telehealth; • Security and privacy of patient information; • Training of telehealth providers; • Logistical factors, including use of equipment, internet/connectivity, and technical troubleshooting. Future directions should involve collaborative research that studies the effectiveness, feasibility, and perceptions of families of rare diseases and providers that use telehealth for clinical healthcare services. Research should also further study and consider ways to improve barriers and challenges associated with implementing telehealth systems into existing healthcare systems.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document