scholarly journals Coronary CT Angiographic and Flow Reserve-Guided Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease

2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (18) ◽  
pp. 2123-2134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bjarne L. Nørgaard ◽  
Christian J. Terkelsen ◽  
Ole N. Mathiassen ◽  
Erik L. Grove ◽  
Hans Erik Bøtker ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 93 (1113) ◽  
pp. 20190763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sagar B Amin ◽  
Arthur E Stillman

The role of diagnostic testing in triaging patients with stable ischemic heart disease continues to evolve towards recognizing the benefits of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) over functional testing. The SCOT-HEART (Scottish Computed Tomography of the HEART) trial highlights this paradigm shift finding a significant reduction of death from coronary heart disease or non-fatal myocardial infarction without a significant increased rate of invasive coronary angiography over a 5 year follow-up period when implementing CCTA with standard care vs standard care alone. The better negative predictive value and ability to identify nonobstructive coronary artery disease to optimize medical therapy highlight the benefits of a CCTA first strategy. With the advent of noninvasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) and widespread availability and ease of CT, CCTA continues to establish itself as a pivotal diagnostic exam for patients with stable ischemic heart disease. In this commentary, we review the SCOT-HEART trial and its impact on CCTA for patients with stable ischemic heart disease.


2020 ◽  
Vol 93 (1113) ◽  
pp. 20190764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silanath Terpenning ◽  
Arthur Stillman

Stable ischemic heart disease remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Although there are multiple imaging modalities to diagnose and/or assist in the clinical management, the most cost-effective approach remains unclear. We reviewed the relevant and recent evidence-based clinical studies and trials to suggest the most cost-effective approach to stable ischemic heart disease. The limitations of these studies are discussed. Incorporating the results of recent multicenter trials, we suggest that for appropriate patients with coronary artery disease with any degree of stenosis or presence of coronary calcium, optimal medical therapy may be most cost-effective. Invasive coronary angiography and/or coronary revascularization would be primarily for non-responders or >/=50% left main stenosis. Stress cardiac magnetic imaging would be performed for those patients with non-diagnostic coronary CT angiography from motion and non-responders from optimal medical therapy in non-diagnostic coronary CT angiography group from high coronary calcium. These paths seem to be safe and cost-effective but requires modeling for confirmation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 409-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rushi V. Parikh ◽  
Grace Liu ◽  
Mary E. Plomondon ◽  
Thomas S.G. Sehested ◽  
Mark A. Hlatky ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
John M. Mandrola ◽  
Sanjay Kaul ◽  
Andrew Foy

AbstractFour recently published randomized controlled trials have informed the care of patients with stable ischemic heart disease. The purpose of this clinical focus article is to offer a summary and critical appraisal of the recent evidence. We aim to aid clinicians in the translation of the trial evidence to patient care.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Imaoka ◽  
N Umemoto ◽  
S Oshima

Abstract Background In clinical setting, ischemic heart disease is a challenging problem in hemodialysis (HD) population. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) measured by 13 ammonia positron emitting tomography (13NH3PET) is an established and reliable modality for detecting coronary artery disease. Furthermore, some prior studies show CFR is an important and independent predictor for cardiovascular event and mortality. On the other hand, HD patients with malnutrition status have poor prognosis. We have reported about the relationship between cardiovascular events and geriatric nutrition risk index (GNRI). Now, we wonder the predictability of combination of CFR and GNRI. Methods and result We collected 438 consecutive HD patients who received 13NH3PET in our hospital suspected for ischemic heart disease. 29 patients were excluded due to undergoing coronary revascularization within 60 days, 103 patients were excluded due to incomplete database. In total, 306 HD patients were classified into 4 group according the median value of CFR (1.99) and GNRI (97.73); Low CFR Low GNRI group (n=77), High CFR and Low GNRI group (n=76), Low CFR High GNRI group (n=78) and High CFR High GNRI group (n=75). We collected their follow up data up to 1544 days (median 833 days) about all-cause mortality and cardiovascular (CV) mortality. Surprisingly, there is no mortality event in High CFR High GNRI group. We analyzed about all-cause mortality, CV mortality. Kaplan-Meyer analysis shows there are statistically intergroup differences in each (all-cause mortality; log rank p<0.01, CV mortality; log rank p=0.02). Furthermore, we calculated area under the curve (AUC) analysis, net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI)m adding GNRI and CFR on conventional risk factors. There are intergroup differences for all-cause mortality in AUC [conventional risk factors, +GNRI, +GNRI+CFR; 0.70, 0.72 (p=0.29), 0.79 (p<0.01)], NRI [+GNRI; 0.32 (p=0.04), +GNRI+CFR 0.82 (p<0.01)] and IDI [+GNRI; 0.01 (p=0.05), +GNRI+CFR 0.09 (p<0.01)]. Conclusion HD patients with low CFR and malnutrition status has statistically significant poorer prognosis comparing HD patients with high CFR and without malnutrition status. Adding combination of GNRI and CFR on conventional risk factors improves the predictability of HD population's prognosis. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Heart Views ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Hosam Zaky ◽  
Hind Elzein ◽  
Arif Al-Mulla ◽  
AlawiA Alsheikh-Ali

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document