Re: “Why don’t female medical students choose diagnostic radiology? A review of the current literature”

2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 386 ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Poller
2004 ◽  
Vol 1 (8) ◽  
pp. 583-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria K Potterton ◽  
Shuolun Ruan ◽  
Jonathan H Sunshine ◽  
Kimberly Applegate ◽  
Yasmin Cypel ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 084653711989366
Author(s):  
Joseph Yang ◽  
Danny Jomaa ◽  
Omar Islam ◽  
Benedetto Mussari ◽  
Corinne Laverty ◽  
...  

Purpose: Implementing competency-based medical education in diagnostic radiology residencies will change the paradigm of learning and assessment for residents. The objective of this study is to evaluate medical student perceptions of competency-based medical education in diagnostic radiology programs and how this may affect their decision to pursue a career in diagnostic radiology. Methods: First-, second-, and third-year medical students at a Canadian university were invited to complete a 14-question survey containing a mix of multiple choice, yes/no, Likert scale, and open-ended questions. This aimed to collect information on students’ understanding and perceptions of competency-based medical education and how the transition to competency-based medical education would factor into their decision to enter a career in diagnostic radiology. Results: The survey was distributed to 300 medical students and received 63 responses (21%). Thirty-seven percent of students had an interest in pursuing diagnostic radiology that ranged from interested to committed and 46% reported an understanding of competency-based medical education and its learning approach. The implementation of competency-based medical education in diagnostic radiology programs was reported to be a positive factor by 70% of students and almost all reported that breaking down residency into measurable milestones and required case exposure was beneficial. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that medical students perceive competency-based medical education to be a beneficial change to diagnostic radiology residency programs. The changes accompanying the transition to competency-based medical education were favored by students and factored into their residency decision-making.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-131
Author(s):  
John Caffey

This volume is a compact miscellany of many important, diagnostic problems in pediatric radiology. It is designed primarily to test the competence of medical students and pediatric and radiologic residents in the diagnostic evaluation of the radiographic changes, in cases in which the radiographic examination plays an essential role. Dr. Heller in the Preface points out that "this little volume presents some of the highlights" in the wide, deep, and complex field of pediatric radiology.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 1344-1352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyndon Luk ◽  
Mary D. Maher ◽  
Elise Desperito ◽  
Joshua L. Weintraub ◽  
Sheik Amin ◽  
...  

BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S273-S274
Author(s):  
Philippa Mitchell ◽  
Ella Varnish ◽  
Arthita Das

AimsClinical Simulation sessions were started in April 2020 to supplement reduced patient contact for medical students at the University of Sheffield due to COVID-19 restrictions. These were run by Foundation Trainees in psychiatry with supervision and oversight from a senior psychiatrist. This study aims to review current literature on remote teaching as a learning resource and will evaluate the effectiveness of clinical simulation as an alternative to patient contact, with the focus being on improving students’ confidence as well as developing clinical interview skills.MethodFeedback surveys were developed, focussing on confidence undertaking difficult aspects of psychiatric interviews, and distributed amongst two cohorts of medical students at the University of Sheffield. One cohort completed their face-to-face psychiatry placement in full pre-COVID, the other undertook placements consisting of virtual simulation sessions alongside reduced patient contact. Responses were collected online over 6 weeks between February and March 2021. As two medical students who completed face-to-face psychiatry placement prior to the pandemic, we have additionally submitted personal reflections as a comparator to current student experiences.ResultA total of 8 students in the clinical simulation cohort, and a total of 13 students from the face-to-face teaching cohort completed the questionnaire. 62.5% of students that responded were female and the remaining percentage identified as male. Students in the face-to-face cohort reported being more confident in 6 out of 7 aspects of our feedback surveys determining confidence undertaking clinical interview skills in comparison to the virtual simulation cohort. Students attended varying numbers of simulation sessions and ultimately the main restrictions and barriers to the simulation teaching reported by students are the time constraints during the sessions, and unstable internet connection.ConclusionOverall confidence levels in medical students are undoubtedly higher in students that completed full face-to-face placements in comparison to those with combined teaching. Based on student responses and review of current literature, clinical simulation appears to serve as a useful adjunct to students with reduced face-to-face contact in psychiatry, particularly for increasing confidence when interviewing more challenging patients. Immediate facilitator feedback and exposure to more difficult patient scenarios seem to be the most beneficial aspects. We would not advocate it as an exclusive form of teaching for medical students, but it may be a useful resource post-pandemic for providing students with extra learning opportunities, specifically targeted at developing confidence and skills in more difficult situations which will hopefully benefit them in their later careers.


2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Kagan Arleo ◽  
Edward Bluth ◽  
Michael Francavilla ◽  
Christopher M. Straus ◽  
Sravanthi Reddy ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica K. Stewart ◽  
Charles M. Maxfield ◽  
Mark L. Lessne

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document