Substance use disorders in bipolar disorders: Clinical correlates and treatment response to mood stabilizers

Author(s):  
Giulia Menculini ◽  
Luca Steardo ◽  
Norma Verdolini ◽  
Federica Cirimbilli ◽  
Patrizia Moretti ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 366-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew E. Hirschtritt ◽  
Maria E. Pagano ◽  
Kelly M. Christian ◽  
Nora K. McNamara ◽  
Robert J. Stansbrey ◽  
...  

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Icro Maremmani ◽  
Matteo Pacini ◽  
Francesco Lamanna ◽  
Pier Paolo Pani ◽  
Giulio Perugi ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTIndividuals suffering from drug addiction may also manifest features of bipolar spectrum disorders. Hyperthymic and cyclothymic temperaments may render individuals vulnerable to later development of substance abuse. Bipolar disorders themselves may be altered or precipitated by substance use, most notably by stimulants (amphetamines), alcohol, and cannabinoids.The clinical usefulness of mood stabilizers, particularly antiepileptics, has been established as safe and effective in substance abusers with and without comorbid mood disorders. Most studies on this issue have been of short duration and focused on the resolution of a currently manifest period of illness. Few studies have been conducted on the usefulness of these drugs on the long-term longitudinal course of these diseases, such as frequently encountered recurrent relapses into states of agitation, impulsivity, and/or dissatisfaction. As opposed to the clinical experience with traditional antidepressants and neuroleptics, antiepileptics do not induce counter-polar states (depressed patients abruptly turning manic or hypomanic; nor patients currently hypomanic or manic turning abruptly depressed). Many clinicians consider antiepileptic mood stabilizers to be the preferred category of medications for the treatment of such patients. Valproate appears to be a potentially fruitful medication to study in these dual diagnosis patients due to preliminary evidence demonstrating its anticraving efficacy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 194 ◽  
pp. 4-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary F. Brunette ◽  
Kim T. Mueser ◽  
Steven Babbin ◽  
Piper Meyer-Kalos ◽  
Robert Rosenheck ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 3026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charanraj Goud Alladi ◽  
Bruno Etain ◽  
Frank Bellivier ◽  
Cynthia Marie-Claire

So far, genetic studies of treatment response in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression have returned results with limited clinical utility. A gene × environment interplay has been proposed as a factor influencing not only pathophysiology but also the treatment response. Therefore, epigenetics has emerged as a major field of research to study the treatment of these three disorders. Among the epigenetic marks that can modify gene expression, DNA methylation is the best studied. We performed a systematic search (PubMed) following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA guidelines for preclinical and clinical studies focused on genome-wide and gene-specific DNA methylation in the context of schizophrenia, bipolar disorders, and major depressive disorder. Out of the 112 studies initially identified, we selected 31 studies among them, with an emphasis on responses to the gold standard treatments in each disorder. Modulations of DNA methylation levels at specific CpG sites have been documented for all classes of treatments (antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, and antidepressants). The heterogeneity of the models and methodologies used complicate the interpretation of results. Although few studies in each disorder have assessed the potential of DNA methylation as biomarkers of treatment response, data support this hypothesis for antipsychotics, mood stabilizers and antidepressants.


2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 147-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Nallet ◽  
B. Weber ◽  
S. Favre ◽  
M. Gex-Fabry ◽  
R. Voide ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundComorbidity of bipolar disorder and alcohol or substance abuse/dependence is frequent and has marked negative consequences on the course of the illness and treatment compliance. The objective of this study was to compare the validity of two short instruments aimed at screening bipolar disorders among patients treated for substance use disorders.MethodsThe Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) and the Hypomania Checklist-32 (HCL-32) were tested with reference to the mood section of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders (SCID) in 152 patients, recruited in two outpatient clinics providing specialized treatment for alcohol and opiate dependence.ResultsAccording to the SCID, 33 patients (21.7%) had a diagnosis within the bipolar spectrum (two bipolar I, 21 bipolar II and 10 bipolar not otherwise specified). The HCL-32 was more sensitive (90.9% vs. 66.7%) and the MDQ more specific (38.7% vs. 77.3%) for the whole sample. The MDQ displayed higher sensitivity and specificity in patients treated for alcohol than for opiate dependence, whereas the HCL-32 was highly sensitive but poorly specific in both samples. Both instruments had a positive predictive value under 50%.ConclusionsCaution is needed when using the MDQ and HCL-32 in patients treated for substance use disorders.


2003 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. S419-S420 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Calabrese ◽  
M. Shelton ◽  
O. Elhaj ◽  
D. Rapport ◽  
E. Youngstrom ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-190 ◽  

Recognition and management of mood symptoms in individuals using alcohol and/or other drugs represent a daily challenge for clinicians in both inpatient and outpatient treatment settings. Diagnosis of underlying mood disorders in the context of ongoing substance abuse requires careful collection of psychiatric history, and is often critical for optimal treatment planning and outcomes. Failure to recognize major depression or bipolar disorders in these patients can result in increased relapse rates, recurrence of mood episodes, and elevated risk of completed suicide. Over the past decade, epidemiologic research has clarified the prevalence of comorbid mood disorders in substance-dependent individuals, overturning previous assumptions that depression in these patients is simply an artifact of intoxication and/or withdrawal, therefore requiring no treatment. However, our understanding of the bidirectional relationships between mood and substance use disorders in terms of their course(s) of illness and prognoses remains limited. Like-wise, strikingly little treatment research exists to guide clinical decision making in co-occurring mood and substance use disorders, given their high prevalence and public health burden. Here we overview what is known and the salient gaps of knowledge where data might enhance diagnosis and treatment of these complicated patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document