P1-209: Comparison of auditory P300 responses in healthy elderly, people with mild cognitive impairment and people with Alzheimer's disease

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. P229-P229
Author(s):  
Derya Durusu Emek ◽  
Gülbalca Cakiroglu ◽  
Meltem Civelek ◽  
Pinar Kurt ◽  
Gorsev Yener
2020 ◽  
Vol 131 ◽  
pp. 110816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe de Oliveira Silva ◽  
José Vinícius Ferreira ◽  
Jéssica Plácido ◽  
Daniel Chagas ◽  
Jomilto Praxedes ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirela Ward ◽  
Juliana F. Cecato ◽  
Ivan Aprahamian ◽  
José Eduardo Martinelli

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate apraxia in healthy elderly and in patients diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Mild cognitive impairment (MCI). METHODS: We evaluated 136 subjects with an average age of 75.74 years (minimum 60 years old, maximum 92 years old) and average schooling of 9 years (minimum of 7 and a maximum of 12 years), using the Mini-Mental State examination (MMSE), Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG) and the Clock Drawing Test. For the analysis of the presence of apraxia, eight subitems from the CAMCOG were selected: the drawings of the pentagon, spiral, house, clock; and the tasks of putting a piece of paper in an envelope; the correct one hand waiving "Goodbye" movements; paper cutting using scissors; and brushing teeth. RESULTS: Elder controls had an average score of 11.51, compared to MCI (11.13), and AD patients, whose average apraxia test scores were the lowest (10.23). Apraxia scores proved able to differentiate the three groups studied (p=0.001). In addition, a negative correlation was observed between apraxia and MMSE scores. CONCLUSION: We conclude that testing for the presence of apraxia is important in the evaluation of patients with cognitive impairments and may help to differentiate elderly controls, MCI and AD.


2014 ◽  
Vol 03 (04) ◽  
pp. 168-186
Author(s):  
Mark Marsico ◽  
Celeste A. de Jager ◽  
April Grant ◽  
Xingshu Zhu ◽  
Arwen Markwick ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Iodice ◽  
Valeria Cassano ◽  
Paolo Maria Rossini

Abstract This article reviews the main articles that have been published so far about the direct and indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on a particularly fragile population represented by the healthy elderly people as well as those with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Such populations have been among the most affected in the early stages of the pandemic due to the direct effects of the virus and numerous indirect effects now emerge and will have to be carefully assessed over time. The pandemic associated to COVID-19 has shifted most of the health resources to the emergency area and has consequently left the three main medical areas that dealing with the elderly population (oncology, time-dependent diseases and degenerative disease) temporarily “uncovered”. In the phase following the emergency, it will be crucial to guarantee to each area the economic and organizational resources to quickly return to the level of support of the pre-pandemic state. The emergency phase represented an important moment of discussion on the possibilities of telemedicine which will inevitably become increasingly important but all the limits of its use in the elderly population have to be considered. In the post-lockdown recovery phase, alongside the classic medical evaluation, the psychological evaluation must become even more important for doctors caring about people with cognitive decline.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document