scholarly journals IC-P-055: EVALUATING RESTING STATE CONNECTIVITY HERITABILITY AT THE WHOLE BRAIN LEVEL

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. P56-P57
Author(s):  
Arman P. Kulkarni ◽  
Cole John Cook ◽  
Gyujoon Hwang ◽  
Veena A. Nair ◽  
Elizabeth M. Meyerand ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. P282-P283
Author(s):  
Arman P. Kulkarni ◽  
Cole John Cook ◽  
Gyujoon Hwang ◽  
Veena A. Nair ◽  
Elizabeth M. Meyerand ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Diego Lombardo ◽  
Catherine Cassé-Perrot ◽  
Jean-Philippe Ranjeva ◽  
Arnaud Le Troter ◽  
Maxime Guye ◽  
...  

AbstractDynamic Functional Connectivity (dFC) in the resting state (rs) is considered as a correlate of cognitive processing. Describing dFC as a flow across morphing connectivity configurations, our notion of dFC speed quantifies the rate at which FC networks evolve in time. Here we probe the hypothesis that variations of rs dFC speed and cognitive performance are selectively interrelated within specific functional subnetworks.In particular, we focus on Sleep Deprivation (SD) as a reversible model of cognitive dysfunction. We found that whole-brain level (global) dFC speed significantly slows down after 24h of SD. However, the reduction in global dFC speed does not correlate with variations of cognitive performance in individual tasks, which are subtle and highly heterogeneous. On the contrary, we found strong correlations between performance variations in individual tasks –including Rapid Visual Processing (RVP, assessing sustained visual attention)– and dFC speed quantified at the level of functional subnetworks of interest. Providing a compromise between classic static FC (no time) and global dFC (no space), modular dFC speed analyses allow quantifying a different speed of dFC reconfiguration independently for sub-networks overseeing different tasks. Importantly, we found that RVP performance robustly correlates with the modular dFC speed of a characteristic frontoparietal module.HighlightsSleep Deprivation (SD) slows down the random walk in FC space implemented by Dynamic Functional Connectivity (dFC) at rest.Whole-brain level slowing of dFC speed does not selectively correlate with fine and taskspecific changes in performanceWe quantify dFC speed separately for different link-based modules coordinated by distinct regional “meta-hubs”Modular dFC speed variations capture subtle and task-specific variations of cognitive performance induced by SD.Author summaryWe interpreted dynamic Functional Connectivity (dFC) as a random walk in the space of possible FC networks performed with a quantifiable “speed”.Here, we analyze a fMRI dataset in which subjects are scanned and cognitively tested both before and after Sleep Deprivation (SD), used as a reversible model of cognitive dysfunction. While global dFC speed slows down after a sleepless night, it is not a sufficiently sensitive metric to correlate with fine and specific cognitive performance changes. To boost the capacity of dFC speed analyses to account for fine and specific cognitive decline, we introduce the notion of modular dFC speed. Capitalizing on an edge-centric measure of functional connectivity, which we call Meta-Connectivity, we isolate subgraphs of FC describing relatively independent random walks (dFC modules) and controlled by distinct “puppet masters” (meta-hubs). We then find that variations of the random walk speed of distinct dFC modules now selectively correlate with SD-induced variations of performance in the different tasks. This is in agreement with the fact that different subsystems – distributed but functionally distinct– oversee different tasks.The high sensitivity of modular dFC analyses bear promise of future applications to the early detection and longitudinal characterization of pathologies such as Alzheimer’s disease.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghazaleh Soleimani ◽  
Rayus Kupliki ◽  
Jerzy Bodurka ◽  
Martin Paulus ◽  
Hamed Ekhtiari

AbstractBackgroundFrontoparietal network (FPN) with multiple cortical nodes is involved in executive functions. Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) can potentially modulate interactions between these nodes using frontoparietal synchronization (FPS). Here we used fMRI and computational head models (CHMs) to inform electrode montage and dosage selection in FPS.MethodsSixty methamphetamine users completed an fMRI drug cue-reactivity task. Two sets of 4×1 HD electrodes with anode over F3 and F4 were simulated and spheres around maximum electric field in each hemisphere were defined as frontal seeds. Using frontal seeds, a task-based functional connectivity analysis was conducted based on a seed-to-whole brain generalized psychophysiological interaction (gPPI). Electrode placement for parietal sites was selected based on gPPI results. Task-based and resting-state connectivity were compared between fMRI-informed and classic F3-P3/F4-P4 montages.ResultsWhole-brain gPPI showed two significant clusters (left: 506 voxels P=0.006, right: 455 voxels P=0.016), located in the inferior parietal lobule under the CP5 and CP6 electrode location. Pair-wise ROI-based gPPI comparing informed (F3-CP5/F4-CP6) and classic (F3-P3/F4-P4) montages showed significant increased PPI and resting-state connectivity only in the informed montage. Cue-induced craving score was also correlated with left (F3-CP5) frontoparietal connectivity in the fMRI-informed montage.ConclusionThis study proposes an analytic pipeline to select electrode montage and dosage in dual site tES using CHMs and task-based connectivity. Stimulating F3-F4 can tap into both FPN and saliency network (SN) based on the montage selection. Using CHM and fMRI will be essential to navigating ample parameter space in the stimulation protocols for future tES studies.HighlightsWe demonstrated a methodology for montage selection in network-based tESTask-based functional connectivity can inform dual-site tES montage selectionHead models can help to induce balance tES dose in targeted brain regionsTargeting DLPFC with tES can tap into both saliency and frontoparietal networksLower resting-state frontoparietal connectivity before cue exposure followed by a greater craving


2021 ◽  
Vol 168 ◽  
pp. S139
Author(s):  
Anna Tabueva ◽  
Ilya Zakharov ◽  
Victoria Ismatullina ◽  
Inna Feklicheva ◽  
Nadezda Chipeeva ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Zhen-Zhen Ma ◽  
Jia-Jia Wu ◽  
Xu-Yun Hua ◽  
Mou-Xiong Zheng ◽  
Xiang-Xin Xing ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document