scholarly journals Impact of RBC Transfusion Volume on Postoperative Outcomes in Neonatal Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 233 (5) ◽  
pp. S178
Author(s):  
Steven C. Mehl ◽  
Jorge I. Portuondo ◽  
Adam M. Vogel ◽  
Monica E. Lopez ◽  
Sohail R. Shah ◽  
...  
Perfusion ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
AH Smith ◽  
DC Hardison ◽  
BC Bridges ◽  
JB Pietsch

Background: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is used in the critically ill with low hemoglobin concentrations to optimize oxygen utilization and delivery imbalance. Data suggest that RBC transfusion is also independently associated with significant morbidity. We seek to characterize RBC transfusion volumes among patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support and test the hypothesis that red blood cell transfusion volume is an independent risk factor for mortality. Methods: Records of all patients receiving ECMO support from 2001 through 2010 at a university-affiliated children’s hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Among 484 ECMO runs reviewed, indications for ECMO were classified as cardiac (40%), non-cardiac (42%) or institution of ECMO during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (18%). Median duration of ECMO support was 4.6 days, with overall survival to hospital discharge significantly higher among non-cardiac patients (60%) relative to patients supported for cardiac (37%) or external CPR (ECPR) indications (34%, p<0.001). Median RBC transfusion volumes with respect to ECMO indication were significantly greater among cardiac (105 mL/kg/day ECMO) and ECPR patients (66 mL/kg/day ECMO) relative to patients supported for non-cardiac indications (20 mL/kg/day ECMO, p<0.001). Among patients supported with ECMO for non-cardiac indications alone (n=203), independent of covariates, including weight, venoarterial mode of ECMO support, presence of congenital diaphragmatic hernia and complications, including hemorrhage, neurologic injury, and renal insufficiency, each RBC transfusion volume of 10 mL/kg/day ECMO was associated with a 24% increase in the odds of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.024, 95% CI 1.004-1.046, p=0.018). Conclusions: Greater red blood cell transfusion volumes among patients supported with ECMO for non-cardiac indications are independently associated with an increase in odds of mortality. A prospective investigation of restrictive RBC transfusion practices while receiving ECMO may be warranted in this population.


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (06) ◽  
pp. 648-656
Author(s):  
Glenn Ramsey ◽  
Paul F. Lindholm

AbstractPatients with cancer have increased risk of thrombosis and often need red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. However, RBC transfusions may also promote thrombosis because of raised hematocrit and viscosity, storage-related RBC damage, and exposure to thrombogenic mediators from obsolescent RBCs. The authors conducted a literature survey for studies examining whether RBC transfusions were associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients. In perioperative cancer surgery patients with categorical comparisons of any versus no RBC transfusion, increased risk of VTE with RBC transfusion was found in 11 of 31 studies, 5 by univariate correlation only and 6 in multivariate analysis. All six multivariate-positive studies had intermediate overall rates of thrombosis (1.4–6.0%), and three were in urological surgery series. In the larger studies of > 2,000 patients (range: 2,219–44,656), the maximum odds ratio among the multivariate-positive studies was 1.3. Perioperative RBC transfusion volume was more strongly associated with VTE risk, with a positive association in six of seven studies. One large registry-based study of hospitalized cancer patients, not restricted to the perioperative setting, found an adjusted odds ratio of 1.60 (95% confidence interval: 1.53–1.67) for VTE risk in patients receiving RBCs compared with nontransfused patients.


2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Sharon Worcester
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 77 (S 02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hazan Basak ◽  
Suha Beton ◽  
Selcuk Mulazimoglu ◽  
Babur Kucuk ◽  
Irfan Yorulmaz ◽  
...  

Reflection ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-137
Author(s):  
L. V. Kukoleva ◽  
◽  
E. A. Olevskaya ◽  
A. V. Guseva ◽  
N. A. Tonkih ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document