scholarly journals Geriatric Surgical Service Complements Care of Older Adult Emergency General Surgery Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 233 (5) ◽  
pp. e75
Author(s):  
Frances Y. Hu ◽  
Lynne O'Mara ◽  
Masami Kelly ◽  
Emma Kerr ◽  
Christina Sheu ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Angamuthu ◽  
J Gilliland ◽  
S Chowdhury ◽  
R D'Souza ◽  
C Hart ◽  
...  

Abstract Background During COVID-19, acute surgical services witnessed an overhaul of practice due to constraints on staff and resource (beds, imaging, and theater) availability. Fear of COVID-19, among general population potentially added to delay in patients seeking medical assistance. This study describes experiences of acute general surgery at a COVID-19 designated tertiary institution wherein elective surgical work was put on hold and emergency on-call rota was modified during the pandemic. Method A retrospective analysis (March-April 2019 vs 2020) of the surgical work from a prospectively maintained surgical database during COVID-19 was performed. Results Emergency surgical admissions during March 2020 vs 2019 was 106 vs 207. Comparing the workload March-April 2020 vs 2019, emergency referrals were 266 vs 341, operations performed 71 vs 92. 31.5% (84/266) of patients were tested for COVID and 30% (25/84) were positive. Emergency surgery was performed in 71 patients (including appendectomies (28), hernia repair(3), laparotomy(3), Hartman’s procedure(3), hemicolectomy(7) and anterior resection with covering ileostomy(2)). In this group, a male preponderance was noted (M:F 1.84:1), the average age was 43.2 years (6-91), length of stay 4.8 days (<23 hours-34 days). In the operative group, the 30-day mortality was 4.23% (3/71) and the morbidity was 31%. Conclusions With local changes, stopping elective services, modifying on-call rota, a surgical department can continue to be functional and offer emergency surgical service for a sustained period during a pandemic. During the COVID pandemic, the average number of referrals, admissions and surgeries were lower when compared to the non-covid period.


2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (9) ◽  
pp. 1178-1184
Author(s):  
Sarah Waterman Manning ◽  
Scotta L. Orr ◽  
Katherine S. Mastriani

Background Nonoperative management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) results in resolution for the majority of patients. Previous studies have demonstrated that outcomes for patients with ASBO are improved when patients are admitted to a surgical service, but the effect of general surgery resident coverage is unclear. This study measures quality outcomes for patients with ASBO after the establishment of a new general surgery residency program. Methods An institutional review board-approved retrospective chart review of admissions for ASBO was conducted following the implementation of a protocol for ASBO nested within a newly developed resident-run emergency general surgery (EGS) service. Patients successfully treated without operative intervention were analyzed. Results During the study period, 612 patients were admitted for ASBO. After initiation of the residency, 74% of ASBO were admitted to a surgical service compared with 35% prior to residency ( P < .01). Length of stay was reduced by 0.77 days ( P = .016), average direct total cost per patient was reduced by 24% ( P = .002), and 30-day readmissions were reduced by 35.7% ( P = .046). There was no significant difference in mortality (1.4% vs 1.0%). Discussion Admission to a resident-run surgical service was associated with statistically significant improvement in outcomes for patients with ASBO. These data corroborate prior studies demonstrating the positive impact of residency programs on patient outcomes and provide additional evidence that general surgery residency programs improve outcomes for patients with surgical disease.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R McLean ◽  
J Young ◽  
A Musbahi ◽  
J X Lee ◽  
H Hidayat ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has led to changes in NHS surgical service provision. This, combined with the government-imposed lockdown, may have impacted on patient attendance, severity of surgical disease, and outcomes. This study aimed to investigate a possible ‘lockdown’ effect on the volume and severity of surgical admissions and outcomes. Method Two cohorts of adult emergency general surgery admissions 30 days immediately before (16/2/2020 to 15/3/2020), and after UK government advice (16/3/2020 to 15/4/2020). Data were collected relating to patient characteristics, disease severity, clinical outcomes, and compared between these groups. Results Following lockdown, a significant reduction in median daily admissions from 7 to 3 (p &lt; 0.001) was observed. Post-lockdown patients were significantly older, frailer with higher inflammatory indices and rates of AKI, and more likely to present with gastrointestinal cancer, obstruction, and perforation. Patients had significantly higher rates of Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥3 complications (p = 0.001), all-cause 30-day mortality (8.5% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.028), but no significant difference was observed in operative 30-day mortality. Conclusions There appears to be a “lockdown” effect on general surgical admissions with fewer admissions, more acutely unwell patients, and an increase in all-cause 30-day mortality. Patients should be advised to present promptly, and this should be reinforced for future lockdowns during the pandemic.


2021 ◽  
Vol 232 (5) ◽  
pp. 671-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamad El Moheb ◽  
Hadi Sabbagh ◽  
Daniel Badin ◽  
Tala Mahmoud ◽  
Basil Karam ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Hashmi ◽  
S Khalid ◽  
K Raja ◽  
A Zaka ◽  
J Easterbrook

Abstract Introduction COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on surgical practice across NHS. RCS released guidance on altering surgical practise during the pandemic to deliver safe surgical care in March, 2020. We present an audit conducted at a DGH comparing practice of emergency general surgery (EGS) with RCS guidance at the peak of COVID-19 pandemic. Method Consecutive patients undergoing EGS from 1st April to 15th May,2020. Data of demographics, ASA grade, comorbidities, type of surgery, hospital stay, informed COVID-19 pneumonia consent, complications and 30-day mortality were collected. Pre- and post-operative COVID-19 status was determined. Results Forty-four (n = 44) patients, mean age 47.5 and IQR (26-69). Male (55.8%) and females (44.2%). Preoperative COVID19 status was confirmed in around 79.1% patients. All (100%) patients who underwent CT imaging preoperatively had CT chest performed. Informed consent for COVID19 pneumonia was taken in 4.7% patients. 30-day mortality risk was 7% and complications risk was 4.7%. RR of 30-day mortality in preoperative COVID19 status positive patients was RR = 0.92 (CI 0.85-1.01) and for complications was RR = 0.95 (CI 0.88-1.02). Conclusions RCS guidance on managing and altering practice in EGS during COVID-19 pandemic is reliable, implementable, and measurable in a DGH setting. Simple improvements in consent process can achieve full compliance with RCS guidelines.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document