Relationships Among the Physical and Social Home Food Environments, Dietary Intake, and Diet Quality in Mothers and Children

Author(s):  
Samantha M. Rex ◽  
Amanda Kopetsky ◽  
Barry Bodt ◽  
Shannon M. Robson
2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 408-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margarita Santiago-Torres ◽  
Alexandra K. Adams ◽  
Aaron L. Carrel ◽  
Tara L. LaRowe ◽  
Dale A. Schoeller

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 432-432
Author(s):  
Fred Molitor ◽  
Celeste Doerr

Abstract Objectives To examine Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2015 scores for dietary intake on weekends versus weekdays overall and by the race/ethnicity of mothers and their children from households eligible for Supplemental Nutrition Education Program-Education (SNAP-Ed). Methods Households with incomes ≤185% of the federal poverty level were randomly selected in 2018 and 2019. A study introduction letter in English or Spanish was sent to each household. Next, bilingual staff verified household eligibility by phone, and the youngest mother/caregiver of children and one child 5 to 11 years. During the subsequent interviews, bilingual staff administered the Automated Self-administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool (ASA24) in English or Spanish. The quantity and size of each reported food and beverage item was determined by asking mothers to reference pictures in a study-provided portion-size booklet or measuring cups or spoons. The procedures were replicated to obtain 24-hour dietary information for children. HEI-2015 scores were calculated based on established procedures from 13 components of dietary intake. In line with previous studies, “weekend” represented the 24-hour dietary recall period occurring on a Friday, Saturday, or Sunday. HEI-2015 scores were regressed for the complete samples, and Latinx, African American, and white mothers and children separately. Covariates were age, education for mothers, gender for children, and number of telephone recruitment attempts leading to and including the two completed interviews per household. Results Complete and paired data were available for 4,166 mothers and children. Mean HEI-2015 scores for mothers was 58.9 (95% CI = 57.8,60.0) and for children was 54.9 (95% CI = 54.0,55.8). For the complete samples, diet quality was poorer on weekends: mothers: B = −1.43 (95% CI = −2.30, −0.564); children: B = −1.58 (95% CI = −2.43, −0.736). However, within racial/ethnic group analyses revealed only Latinx mothers and children to have poorer weekend versus weekday diets. Conclusions Studies of Latinx mothers and their children should investigate reasons for poorer diets on weekends, and such factors should be incorporated into SNAP-Ed and other nutrition interventions directed at Latinx families. Funding Sources California Department of Social Services.


2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. S91-S92
Author(s):  
Nicole Larson ◽  
Marla E. Eisenberg ◽  
Jerica M. Berge ◽  
Chrisa Arcan ◽  
Dianne Neumark-Sztainer

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 1053
Author(s):  
Megan C Whatnall ◽  
Zhao Min Soo ◽  
Amanda J Patterson ◽  
Melinda J Hutchesson

University food environments are typically dominated by unhealthy food choices. The aim was to investigate associations between on-campus food purchasing behaviours and dietary intake in an Australian university student sample. An online cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2017–2018 with students (n = 362, 71.0% female, mean age 27.5 ± 10.5 years) from the University of Newcastle, Australia. On-campus food purchasing behaviours (purchasing frequency and weekly expenditure), dietary intake (diet quality and percentage energy/day from energy-dense, nutrient-poor (EDNP) foods) and sociodemographic and student characteristics (e.g., time spent on campus) were measured. Linear regression was used to explore associations between food purchasing behaviours and dietary intake, adjusted for potential confounders. Mean percentage energy/day from EDNP foods was 31.7 ± 14.4. Mean diet quality score was 32.6 ± 10.2 out of 73. Higher percentage energy/day from EDNP foods was associated with higher weekly expenditure (β = 0.203, p < 0.001) and more frequent purchase (β = 18.041, p < 0.001 for ≥4 times a week vs. never) of food/drinks on campus. Diet quality was not significantly associated with purchase frequency or expenditure (p > 0.05). Findings are supportive of changes being made to university food environments, as a strategy to improve dietary intake among university students.


2015 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 43-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Larson ◽  
Marla E. Eisenberg ◽  
Jerica M. Berge ◽  
Chrisa Arcan ◽  
Dianne Neumark-Sztainer

2009 ◽  
Vol 99 (7) ◽  
pp. 1216-1219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa C. Nelson ◽  
Nicole I. Larson ◽  
Daheia Barr-Anderson ◽  
Dianne Neumark-Sztainer ◽  
Mary Story

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meredith T. Niles ◽  
Kristen Brassard Wirkkala ◽  
Emily H. Belarmino ◽  
Farryl Bertmann

Abstract Background Home food procurement (HFP) (i.e. gardening, fishing, foraging, hunting, backyard livestock and canning) have historically been important ways that people obtain food. Recently, some HFP activities have grown (e.g. gardening), while other activities (e.g. hunting) have become less common in the United States. Anecdotally, COVID-19 has sparked an increase in HFP evidenced by increased hunting licenses and shortages in seeds and canning supplies. HFP may have positive benefits for food security and diet quality, though research beyond gardening is especially limited in high-income countries. Methods We examine HFP activities since the COVID-19 pandemic began, and their relationship to food security and dietary quality using multivariable logit models and matching analysis with a statewide representative survey (n = 600) of residents of Vermont, United States. Results We find 29% of respondent households classified as food insecure since COVID-19, and higher prevalence of food insecurity among those experiencing a negative job change since COVID-19, households earning less than $50,000 annually, Hispanic and multi-race respondents. Nearly 35% of respondents engaged in HFP activities since the COVID-19 pandemic began; the majority of those gardened, and more than half pursued HFP activities more intensely than before the pandemic or for the first time. Food insecure households were more likely to pursue HFP more intensely, including more gardening, fishing, foraging, and hunting. Respondents who were food insecure, Black, Indigenous, People of Color, those with a negative job disruption, and larger households all had greater odds of increased intensity of HFP during the COVID-19 pandemic. HFP was significantly associated with eating greater amounts of fruits and vegetables; however, this effect was only significant for food secure households. Conclusion Overall, these results suggest that HFP activities have increased since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, and may be an important safety net for food insecure households. However, HFP for food insecure households does not translate into the same higher fruit and vegetable intake as found among food secure HFP households, suggesting this population may be trying to maintain intake, or that they may have potential important resource or technical assistance needs. Long-term, HFP activities may have important food security and diet quality impacts, as well as conservation implications, which should be more thoroughly explored. Regardless, the increased interest and intensity of HFP demonstrates opportunities for educational and outreach efforts.


Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1850
Author(s):  
Hollie A. Raynor ◽  
Suzanne E. Mazzeo ◽  
Jessica Gokee LaRose ◽  
Elizabeth L. Adams ◽  
Laura M. Thornton ◽  
...  

Concerns remain about dietary changes during pediatric obesity treatment and eating pathology, which have not been investigated. This secondary data analysis from a randomized clinical trial examined associations between adolescents’ changes in energy intake and diet quality during obesity treatment with post-treatment eating pathology. Adolescents (N = 82: 13.7 ± 1.2 y, 34.9 ± 7.0 kg/m2, 63.4% female, 46.3% black) received TEENS+, a 4-month multicomponent intervention. TEENS+ provided individualized dietary goals (1200–1800 kcal/day; number of “Go” foods/day (low-energy, high-nutrient-dense foods)). At 0 and 4 months, 3-day food records assessed energy intake and diet quality (Healthy Eating Index 2015 (HEI-2015)). Two HEI-2015 subscores were created: components to increase (increase), and components to limit (decrease). The Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire measured eating pathology (total score and subscales: restraint; and eating, weight, and shape concern). Corrected p-values are reported as q-values. Energy intake decreased (−292 ± 418 kcal/day; q < 0.001), while diet quality improved during treatment (total HEI-2015 (4.5 ± 15.1; q = 0.034) and increase (3.3 ± 9.4; q = 0.011)). Restraint increased (+0.6 ± 1.4; q < 0.001), whereas shape (−0.5 ± 1.3; q = 0.004) and weight (−0.5 ± 1.4; q = 0.015) concerns decreased. Greater decreases in energy intake were associated with greater restraint post-treatment (F = 17.69; q < 0.001). No other significant associations were observed. Changes in adolescents’ dietary intake during obesity treatment were unrelated to increased shape, weight, or eating concerns post-treatment.


Nutrients ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 2952
Author(s):  
Yong Zhu ◽  
Neha Jain ◽  
Vipra Vanage ◽  
Norton Holschuh ◽  
Anne Hermetet Agler ◽  
...  

This study examined differences in dietary intake between ready-to-eat cereal eaters and non-eaters in adults from the United States. Participants (n = 5163) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2015–2016 were included. One-day dietary recall was used to define ready-to-eat cereal consumption status and estimate dietary intake in eaters and non-eaters. Data from Food Patterns Equivalent Database 2015–2016 were used to compare intakes of food groups by consumption status. Diet quality was assessed by Healthy Eating Index 2015. Nineteen percent of US adults were ready-to-eat cereal eaters; they had a similar level of energy intake as non-eaters, but they had significantly higher intake of dietary fiber, and several vitamins and minerals, such as calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium, zinc, vitamin A, thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, vitamin B6, folate, vitamin B12, and vitamin D. They were also more likely to meet nutrient recommendations. Compared to non-eaters, ready-to-eat cereal eaters had the same level of added sugar intake but they had significantly higher intake of whole grains, total fruits, and dairy products. The diet quality of ready-to-eat cereal eaters was significantly higher than that of non-eaters. The study supports that ready-to-eat cereal eaters have better dietary intake with a healthier dietary pattern than non-eaters in the United States.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document