Optimal collective investment: The impact of sharing rules, management fees and guarantees

2021 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. 106012
Author(s):  
An Chen ◽  
Thai Nguyen ◽  
Manuel Rach
Keyword(s):  
Management Fees ◽  
Sharing Rules ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals The Impact of Management Fees on the Pricing of Variable Annuity Guarantees

Risks ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 103
Author(s):  
Jin Sun ◽  
Pavel Shevchenko ◽  
Man Fung
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Experiments ◽  
Downside Risk ◽  
Equity Market ◽  
Retirement Income ◽  
Variable Annuities ◽  
Management Fees ◽  
Market Friction ◽  
Market Management ◽  
Retirement Fund ◽  
The Impact

Variable annuities, as a class of retirement income products, allow equity market exposure for a policyholder’s retirement fund with optional guarantees to limit the downside risk of the market. Management fees andguarantee insurance fees are charged respectively for the market exposure and for the protection from the downside risk. We investigate the pricing of variable annuity guarantees under optimal withdrawal strategies when management fees are present. We consider from both policyholder’s and insurer’s perspectives optimal withdrawal strategies and calculate the respective fair insurance fees. We reveal a discrepancy where the fees from the insurer’s perspective can be significantly higher due to the management fees serving as a form of market friction. Our results provide a possible explanation of lower guarantee insurance fees observed in the market than those predicted from the insurer’s perspective. Numerical experiments are conducted to illustrate the results.

scholarly journals KiwiSaver fund performance and asset allocation policy

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 232-257
Author(s):  
Huong Dieu Dang
Keyword(s):  
Asset Allocation ◽  
Tracking Error ◽  
Excess Return ◽  
Superior Performance ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Allocation Policy ◽  
Holding Period ◽  
Management Fees ◽  
The Impact

Purpose This paper aims to examine the performance and benchmark asset allocation policy of 70 KiwiSaver funds catergorised as growth, balanced or conservative over the period October 2007-June 2016. The study focuses on the sources for returns variability across time and returns variation among funds. Design/methodology/approach Each fund is benchmarked against a portfolio of eight indices representing eight invested asset classes. Three measures were used to examine the after-fee benchmark-adjusted performance of each fund: excess return, cumulative abnormal return and holding period returns difference. Tracking error and active share were used to capture manager’s benchmark deviation. Findings On average, funds underperform their respective benchmarks, with the mean quarterly excess return (after management fees) of −0.15 per cent (growth), −0.63 per cent (balanced) and −0.83 per cent (conservative). Benchmark returns variability, on average, explains 43-78 per cent of fund’s across-time returns variability, and this is primarily driven by fund’s exposures to global capital markets. Differences in benchmark policies, on average, account for 18.8-39.3 per cent of among-fund returns variation, while differences in fees and security selection may explain the rest. About 61 per cent of balanced and 47 per cent of Growth funds’ managers make selection bets against their benchmarks. There is no consistent evidence that more actively managed funds deliver higher after-fee risk-adjusted performance. Superior performance is often due to randomness. Originality/value This study makes use of a unique data set gathered directly from KiwiSaver managers and captures the long-term strategic asset allocation target which underlines the investment management process in reality. The study represents the first attempt to examine the impact of benchmark asset allocation policy on KiwiSaver fund’s returns variability across time and returns variation among funds.

scholarly journals How Rational and Competitive Is the Market for Mutual Funds?*

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 579-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Leippold ◽  
Roger Rueegg
Keyword(s):  
Mutual Funds ◽  
Mutual Fund ◽  
Null Hypothesis ◽  
Economies Of Scale ◽  
Management Fees ◽  
Fund Industry ◽  
Mutual Fund Industry ◽  
Traditional Risk Factors ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Higher Sensitivity

Abstract To explore the rationality and competitiveness of the mutual fund industry, we analyze the alpha of active and index mutual funds from a global sample of more than 60,000 equity and fixed income funds and test the null hypothesis that alphas to investors are zero. We distinguish between institutional and retail investors since there are significant differences in management fees, economies of scale, and information asymmetries between these two groups. Using a new robust statistical test, we cannot reject our null hypothesis for the majority of investment categories. We find that the average active fund has less exposure to traditional risk factors, but higher sensitivity to alternative risk premia. Fund persistence and the impact of size and fees add further support to our conclusion that the mutual fund industry is highly competitive, except for US domestic funds. This set of funds is excessively overfunded compared with other fund categories.

scholarly journals A collective investment problem in a stochastic volatility environment: The impact of sharing rules

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
An Chen ◽  
Thai Nguyen ◽  
Manuel Rach
Keyword(s):  
Stochastic Volatility ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Pension Funds ◽  
Individual Investors ◽  
Sharing Rule ◽  
Fund Managers ◽  
Investment Problem ◽  
Sharing Rules ◽  
State Dependent ◽  
The Impact

AbstractIt is typical in collectively administered pension funds that employees delegate fund managers to invest their contributions. In addition, many pension funds still need to sustain guarantees (prescribed by law) in spite of the current low interest environment. In this paper, we consider an optimal collective investment problem for a pool of investors who (implicitly) demand minimum guarantees by deriving utility from the wealth exceeding their guarantees in two financial market settings, one with a stochastic and one with a constant volatility. We find that individual investors’ well-being will not be worsened through the collective investment in both financial markets, as individual optimal solutions are attainable if a financially fair state-dependent sharing rule is applied. When more prevailing sharing rules like linear rules are applied, this holds no longer. Furthermore, the degree of sub-optimality imposed by linear sharing rules is more pronounced in the stochastic volatility market than in the constant volatility market.

Formation of Lunar Craters and Bright Rays as a Result of Meteorite Impacts

1962 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 415-418
Author(s):  
K. P. Stanyukovich ◽  
V. A. Bronshten
Keyword(s):  
Explosive Charge ◽  
The Moon ◽  
Meteorite Impacts ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Lunar Craters ◽  
The Impact

The phenomena accompanying the impact of large meteorites on the surface of the Moon or of the Earth can be examined on the basis of the theory of explosive phenomena if we assume that, instead of an exploding meteorite moving inside the rock, we have an explosive charge (equivalent in energy), situated at a certain distance under the surface.

The Geosciences Applied to Lunar Exploration

1962 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 169-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Green
Keyword(s):  
Lunar Surface ◽  
Probable Mechanism ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Lunar Exploration ◽  
Geological Model ◽  
Apply Geophysics ◽  
Surface Features ◽  
The Impact

The term geo-sciences has been used here to include the disciplines geology, geophysics and geochemistry. However, in order to apply geophysics and geochemistry effectively one must begin with a geological model. Therefore, the science of geology should be used as the basis for lunar exploration. From an astronomical point of view, a lunar terrain heavily impacted with meteors appears the more reasonable; although from a geological standpoint, volcanism seems the more probable mechanism. A surface liberally marked with volcanic features has been advocated by such geologists as Bülow, Dana, Suess, von Wolff, Shaler, Spurr, and Kuno. In this paper, both the impact and volcanic hypotheses are considered in the application of the geo-sciences to manned lunar exploration. However, more emphasis is placed on the volcanic, or more correctly the defluidization, hypothesis to account for lunar surface features.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document