A post-surgical rehabilitation program for women over 60 years old who underwent surgery in trauma and orthopedic hospital after distal radius fracture

Author(s):  
Alejandra Aguilera-Godoy ◽  
Marcela Andrea Antúnez-Riveros ◽  
Gabriel Carrasco-Penna ◽  
Rodrigo Núñez-Cortés
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengbo Luo ◽  
Jinjie Lou ◽  
Shengwu Yang

Introduction. Internal fixation with volar locking plate (VLP) was widely adopted as a first-line choice in treatment of distal radius fracture (DRF). Methods. Total 315 patients with distal radius fracture receiving VLP fixation were included for analysis in this study. The rehabilitation protocol was started immediately after surgery for all patients. During the initial two weeks after surgery, 149 patients received 200 mg celecoxib twice per day, 89 received buprenorphine transdermal patch at 5 μg/h, and 77 received 13 mg codeine plus 200 mg ibuprofen twice per day for pain management. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores of pain at rest, daily activity, and rehabilitative exercise were measured, respectively, every week according to the experiences of the past week in the initial six weeks after surgery. Functional outcomes including range of motion (ROM) for extension, flexion, pronation, supination, ulnar and radial abduction, the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score and the validated patient rated wrist evaluation (PRWE), and grip strength were collected at one, three, and six months after surgery. Results. We showed that patients receiving transdermal buprenorphine and codeine/ibuprofen had decreased VAS scores during rehabilitative exercise, better compliance to the rehabilitation program, and thus faster functional recovery. Conclusions. We recommend transdermal buprenorphine or codeine/ibuprofen for pain management during rehabilitation after distal radius fracture stabilized with VLP.


2005 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 257-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandar Djurovic ◽  
Mirjana Zivotic-Vanovic ◽  
Zoran Railic

Background. The use of orthoses is a questionable rehabilitation method for patients with the distal radius fracture at typical site. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of the rehabilitation on patients with radius fracture at the typical site, who wore circumferential static wrist orthoses, with those who did not wear them. Methods. Thirty patients were divided into 3 equal groups, 2 experimental groups, and 1 control group. The patients in the experimental groups were given the rehabilitation program of wearing serially manufactured (off-the-shelf), as well as custom-fit orthoses. Those in the control group did not wear wrist orthoses. Evaluation parameters were pain, edema, the range of the wrist motion, the quality of cylindrical, spherical, and pinch-spherical grasp, the strength of pinch and hand grasp, and patient's assessment of the effects of rehabilitation. Results. No significant difference in the effects of rehabilitation on the patients in experimental groups as opposed to control group was found. Patients in the first experimental group, and in control group were more satisfied with the effects of rehabilitation, as opposed to the patients in the second experimental group (p<0,05). Conclusion. The effects of circumferential static wrist orthoses in the rehabilitation of patients with distal radius fracture at the typical site were not clinically significant. There was no significant difference between the custom and off-the-shelf orthoses.


Author(s):  
Pantouvaki Anna ◽  
Kastanis Grigorios

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the frequency of unstable distal radius fractures in adult population and the management performed in orthopaedic and physiotherapy department of the General Hospital” Venizeleio” in Heraklion-Crete re-organised due to pandemic period. In pandemic period, due to urgent needs of covid-19 patients, a lot of orthopaedic associations suggested some restrictions concerning the treatment of DRF. The aim of this study is to answer in two hypothetical questions. First, did patients with unstable DRF receive a conservative instead of surgical treatment and second is the protocol of rehabilitation program still the same or do the patients receive a modified rehabilitation program? Methods: Patients admitted in the emergency department of the hospital during pandemic period of 2020 with distal radius fracture surgically treated, were evaluated and data compared with those of pre-pandemic period. (2018-2019). Results: A number of 32, 35 and 42 patients with DRF were treated and hospitalized in 2018, 2019 (pre-pandemic period) and 2020 (pandemic period) respectively. The mean age of patients did not appear with any statistical difference. (p= .93) between periods and causes of DRF did not change dramatically. Additionally, there was a remarkable variation in number of patients between the 1st and 2nd semesters of quarantine period. (p=.68). Conclusion: Adaptations in management of distal radius fracture during lockdown did not affect patient’s surgical and rehabilitation treatment and functional outcomes. The mean age of patients treated, did not vary during pandemic period while the causes of DRF. But it was obligatory to adopt the rehabilitation treatment plan and the number of hospital visits due to Covid-19 precautions.


Hand ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 155894472199973
Author(s):  
Nicholas Munaretto ◽  
Adam Tagliero ◽  
Raahil Patel ◽  
Peter C. Rhee

Background Little information exists to guide decision-making with regard to distal radius fractures in the setting of ipsilateral hemiparesis or hemiplegia. Methods Patients who sustained a distal radius fracture in the setting of ipsilateral hemiparesis or hemiplegia secondary to brain injury were evaluated. Investigated variables included perioperative pain, preinjury House functional classification score, length of immobilization, radiographic outcome measurements, and time to union. Results There were 15 patients with distal radius fractures with a mean age of 65.9 years. The mean clinical and radiographic follow-up was 2.8 and 2.9 years, respectively. Wrists were placed into the nonoperative group (NOG, n = 10) and operative group (OG, n = 5). Pain significantly decreased at final follow-up for both groups. Baseline House functional classification scores averaged 1.3 and 1.6 for the NOG and OG, respectively, and were maintained at final follow-up. Length of immobilization for the NOG was 46 days and OG was 37 days, P = .15. Radiographic outcomes at final follow-up in the NOG and OG, respectively, were a mean radial height of 9.3 versus. 11.6 mm, radial inclination of 18.3° versus 22.3°, 4.2° dorsal tilt versus 5.3° volar tilt, and tear drop angle of 45.6° versus 44.5°. There were no significant differences in these measurements. Time to radiographic union averaged 58 days for the NOG and 67 days for the OG, P = .42. There were no revision surgeries. Conclusions Based on this small case series, patients with distal radius fracture and ipsilateral hemiparesis or hemiplegia may have similar clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes, regardless of nonoperative or operative treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document