Comparison of ultrasonography and radiography in assessment of the heel pad compressibility index of patients with plantar heel pain syndrome. Measurement of the fat pad in plantar heel pain syndrome

2006 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murat Uzel ◽  
Ercan Cetinus ◽  
Erkal Bilgic ◽  
Hasan Ekerbicer ◽  
Ahmet Karaoguz
1999 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 663-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Chung Tsai ◽  
Chung-Li Wang ◽  
Tsz-Ching Hsu ◽  
Fon-Jou Hsieh ◽  
Fuk-Tan Tang

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-48
Author(s):  
Mohammed SH. Al-Edanni

Background: Plantar heel pain is a clinical syndrome characterized by pain and tenderness beneath the heel which is typically worse in the morning and improves after the first few steps in the day. It is a common and frequently disabling clinical complaint that may be caused by a broad spectrum of osseous or soft tissue disorders. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of an operation of multiple drilling of calcaneum for resistant plantar heel pain syndrome. Methods: During the period from November 2012 to August 2016, 17 patients (17heels) were enrolled in a cohort clinical study at the orthopedic unit in AL-Sheikh Zayed and Al-Wassity Hospitals.  Result: Drilling of the calcaneum is a simple procedure achieving 70.6% cure in resistant ases with few complications provided good patient selection was done. Conclusion: Abnormalities in the intraosseous pressure within the calcaneum are a possible cause of plantar heel pain in some patients who failed to respond to conservative treatment  


2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 321-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Man-hong Steve Cheung ◽  
Tun-hing Lui

The differential diagnosis of heel pain is extensive. The plantar heel pain is usually due to mechanical etiology, including plantar fasciitis, calcaneal spur, stress fracture, and nerve entrapment. Tumor is a rare cause of plantar heel pain. We present a case of chronic plantar heel pain with a vascular leiomyoma at the heel pad. Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level IV, Case study


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 397-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott C. Wearing ◽  
James E. Smeathers ◽  
Bede Yates ◽  
Stephen R. Urry ◽  
Philip Dubois

2001 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 662-665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulunay Kanatli ◽  
Haluk Yetkin ◽  
Aykin Simsek ◽  
Koksal Besli ◽  
Akif Ozturk

Loss of heel pad elasticity has been suggested as one of the possible explanations of heel pain. This study aimed to determine the effect of heel pad thickness and its compressibility to heel pressure distribution, in 47 (94 feet) normal subjects and 59 (94 feet) patients with heel pain, using radiological measurements and EMED-SF (Novel, Munich) plantar pressure distribution measurement system. Both heels of the patients and control group were radiographed with and without weight bearing. The ratio of the heel pad thickness in loading to unloading position was defined as “the heel pad compressibility index.” The plantar peak pressure of the heel was measured at heel strike phase of the gait cycle. The compressibility index for control and patient groups were found to be 0.60 and 0.69, respectively. The peak pressure under the heel pad was recorded to be 28.4 N/cm2 for patients and 31.7 N/cm2 for control group. No significant difference was found for heel pad compressibility index and heel pad pressures between patient and control groups (p>0.05). This study revealed that there is no relationship between heel pad compressibility and pressure distribution of the heel pad both in control and patient group. We feel the flexibility of the heel pad does not have any influence on heel pain syndromes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document