scholarly journals Telephone-supported acceptance and commitment bibliotherapy for people with multiple sclerosis and psychological distress: A pilot randomised controlled trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 103-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barnaby J. Proctor ◽  
Nima G. Moghaddam ◽  
Nikos Evangelou ◽  
Roshan das Nair
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katy Muray ◽  
Giulia Melchiorre ◽  
Alastair Dobbin ◽  
Killian A Welch

Introduction: Psychological distress is a major issue in multiple sclerosis (MS), having a significant impact on quality of life. Antidepressants are generally unhelpful for subsyndromal symptomatology, and psychological treatment approaches often not accessible or too cognitively demanding for some patients. There is an urgent need for low-cost interventions to improve wellbeing in MS. Methods: This was a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) of Positive Mental Training (PosMT), a low intensity intervention providing training in positivity, optimism and resilience previously shown to improve anxious and depressive symptomotology. 28 patients with MS were randomised to the intervention and 30 to the control group. Results: Follow-up data was obtained from 39 patents. The majority of participants receiving PosMT reported that they had used the intervention, with few reporting side effects. The intervention group reported a significant improvement in self-rated health as measured by the EuroQual visual analogue scale, F(4,34) = 3.204, p = 0.025, R2 = 0.274. Discussion: This preliminary RCT found that PosMT in its current form could be used by patients with MS with little difficulty. Despite the small size of the study, allocation to the intervention was found to be associated with a significant improvement in self-rated health. Given the low cost of PosMT and its easy availability (it can simply be downloaded from a website), this pilot RCT suggests it could be a useful tool for MS patients. We believe this intervention warrants further study, ideally in a large multi-centre RCT.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. e051478
Author(s):  
Cristina García-Muñoz ◽  
María Jesús Casuso-Holgado ◽  
Juan Carlos Hernández-Rodríguez ◽  
Elena Pinero-Pinto ◽  
Rocío Palomo-Carrión ◽  
...  

IntroductionVestibular system damage in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) may have a central and/or peripheral origin. Subsequent vestibular impairments may contribute to dizziness, balance disorders and fatigue in this population. Vestibular rehabilitation targeting vestibular impairments may improve these symptoms. Furthermore, as a successful tool in neurological rehabilitation, immersive virtual reality (VRi) could also be implemented within a vestibular rehabilitation intervention.Methods and analysisThis protocol describes a parallel-arm, pilot randomised controlled trial, with blinded assessments, in 30 patients with MS with vestibular impairment (Dizziness Handicap Inventory ≥16). The experimental group will receive a VRi vestibular rehabilitation intervention based on the conventional Cawthorne-Cooksey protocol; the control group will perform the conventional protocol. The duration of the intervention in both groups will be 7 weeks (20 sessions, 3 sessions/week). The primary outcomes are the feasibility and safety of the vestibular VRi intervention in patients with MS. Secondary outcome measures are dizziness symptoms, balance performance, fatigue and quality of life. Quantitative assessment will be carried out at baseline (T0), immediately after intervention (T1), and after a follow-up period of 3 and 6 months (T2 and T3). Additionally, in order to further examine the feasibility of the intervention, a qualitative assessment will be performed at T1.Ethics and disseminationThe study was approved by the Andalusian Review Board and Ethics Committee, Virgen Macarena-Virgen del Rocio Hospitals (ID 2148-N-19, 25 March 2020). Informed consent will be collected from participants who wish to participate in the research. The results of this research will be disseminated by publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals.Trial registration numberNCT04497025.


2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Acarturk ◽  
E. Uygun ◽  
Z. Ilkkursun ◽  
T. Yurtbakan ◽  
G. Kurt ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Syrian refugees resettled in Turkey show a high prevalence of symptoms of mental disorders. Problem Management Plus (PM+) is an effective psychological intervention delivered by non-specialist health care providers which has shown to decrease psychological distress among people exposed to adversity. In this single-blind pilot randomised controlled trial, we examined the methodological trial procedures of Group PM+ (gPM+) among Syrian refugees with psychological distress in Istanbul, Turkey, and assessed feasibility, acceptability, perceived impact and the potential cost-effectiveness of the intervention. Methods Refugees with psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, K10 > 15) and impaired psychosocial functioning (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS 2.0 > 16) were recruited from the community and randomised to either gPM+ and enhanced care as usual (E-CAU) (n = 24) or E-CAU only (n = 22). gPM+ comprised of five weekly group sessions with eight to ten participants per group. Acceptability and feasibility of the intervention were assessed through semi-structured interviews. The primary outcome at 3-month follow-up was symptoms of depression and anxiety (Hopkins Symptoms Checklist-25). Psychosocial functioning (WHODAS 2.0), symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder and self-identified problems (Psychological Outcomes Profiles, PSYCHLOPS) were included as secondary outcomes. A modified version of the Client Service Receipt Inventory was used to document changes in the costs of health service utilisation as well as productivity losses. Results There were no barriers experienced in recruiting study participants and in randomising them into the respective study arms. Retention in gPM+ was high (75%). Qualitative analyses of the interviews with the participants showed that Syrian refugees had a positive view on the content, implementation and format of gPM+. No adverse events were reported during the implementation. The study was not powered to detect an effect. No significant difference between gPM+ and E-CAU group on primary and secondary outcome measures, or in economic impacts were found. Conclusions gPM+ delivered by non-specialist peer providers seemed to be an acceptable, feasible and safe intervention for Syrian refugees in Turkey with elevated levels of psychological distress. This pilot RCT sets the stage for a fully powered RCT. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03567083; date: 25/06/2018.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document