Feature tracking computed tomography-derived left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with aortic stenosis: a comparative analysis with echocardiographic measurements

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 240-245
Author(s):  
Tea Gegenava ◽  
Pieter van der Bijl ◽  
Kensuke Hirasawa ◽  
E. Mara Vollema ◽  
Alexander van Rosendael ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Gegenava ◽  
P Bijl ◽  
M Vollema ◽  
F Kley ◽  
A Weger ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Advances in left ventricular (LV) analysis with dynamic multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) permit measurement of LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) and have shown their impact on risk stratification of patients with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Purpose To evaluate the influence of baseline feature tracking (FT) MDCT- derived LV GLS on LV functional recovery in severe AS patients undergoing TAVI. Methods A total of 194 patients with severe AS (50% male, 80±7 years) with dynamic MDCT data allowing LV GLS measurement with a novel FT algorithm and having complete echocardiography evaluation at baseline, at 3–6 months and at 1 year follow-up were evaluated. FT MDCT-derived LV GLS was measured at baseline and the study population was divided according to a cut-off value of MDCT LV GLS −14% (≤−14% [more preserved LV systolic function] vs. >−14% [more impaired LV systolic function]). Results Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)-derived Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased over time in both groups: in patients with preserved and reduced MDCT LV GLS, and reached a higher value in patients with preserved MDCT LV GLS (52±7% at baseline, 55±7% at 3–6 months, 58±7% at 1 year follow-up vs. 43±10% at baseline, 49±10% at 3–6 months, 53±11% at 1 year follow-up; p=0.016) (Figure 1). TTE-derived LV GLS also showed greater improvement for patients with preserved MDCT LV GLS (−17±3% at baseline, −18±3% at 3–6 months, −20±3% at 1 year follow-up vs. −12±3% at baseline, −15±3% at 3–6 months, −16±3% at 1 year follow-up; p=0.027) (Figure 1). Conclusions In severe AS patients treated with TAVI, LV function improves significantly at 3–6 and at 12 months' follow-up and shows superior recovery in patients with more preserved baseline MDCT LV GLS, suggesting that MDCT-derived LV GLS has an important impact on LV functional recovery after TAVI. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saikrishna Ananthapadmanabhan ◽  
Giau Vo ◽  
Tuan Nguyen ◽  
Hany Dimitri ◽  
James Otton

Abstract Background Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) and speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) are well-established strain imaging modalities. Multilayer strain measurement permits independent assessment of endocardial and epicardial strain. This novel and layer specific approach to evaluating myocardial deformation parameters may provide greater insight into cardiac contractility when compared to whole-layer strain analysis. The aim of this study is to validate CMR-FT as a tool for multilayer strain analysis by providing a direct comparison between multilayer global longitudinal strain (GLS) values between CMR-FT and STE. Methods We studied 100 patients who had an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), who underwent CMR imaging and echocardiogram at baseline and follow-up (48 ± 13 days). Dedicated tissue tracking software was used to analyse single- and multi-layer GLS values for CMR-FT and STE. Results Correlation coefficients for CMR-FT and STE were 0.685, 0.687, and 0.660 for endocardial, epicardial, and whole-layer GLS respectively (all p < 0.001). Bland Altman analysis showed good inter-modality agreement with minimal bias. The absolute limits of agreement in our study were 6.4, 5.9, and 5.5 for endocardial, whole-layer, and epicardial GLS respectively. Absolute biases were 1.79, 0.80, and 0.98 respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values showed moderate agreement with values of 0.626, 0.632, and 0.671 respectively (all p < 0.001). Conclusion There is good inter-modality agreement between CMR-FT and STE for whole-layer, endocardial, and epicardial GLS, and although values should not be used interchangeably our study demonstrates that CMR-FT is a viable imaging modality for multilayer strain


Author(s):  
Maurício Fregonesi Barbosa ◽  
Mariana Moraes Contti ◽  
Luis Gustavo Modelli de Andrade ◽  
Alejandra del Carmen Villanueva Mauricio ◽  
Sergio Marrone Ribeiro ◽  
...  

AbstractTo determine whether left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) measured by feature-tracking (FT) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) improves after kidney transplantation (KT) and to analyze associations between LV GLS, reverse remodeling and myocardial tissue characteristics. This is a prospective single-center cohort study of kidney transplant recipients who underwent two CMR examinations in a 3T scanner, including cines, tagging, T1 and T2 mapping. The baseline exam was done up to 10 days after transplantation and the follow-up after 6 months. Age and sex-matched healthy controls were also studied for comparison. A total of 44 patients [mean age 50 ± 11 years-old, 27 (61.4%) male] completed the two CMR exams. LV GLS improved from − 13.4% ± 3.0 at baseline to − 15.2% ± 2.7 at follow-up (p < 0.001), but remained impaired when compared with controls (− 17.7% ± 1.5, p = 0.007). We observed significant correlation between improvement in LV GLS with reductions of left ventricular mass index (r = 0.356, p = 0.018). Improvement in LV GLS paralleled improvements in LV stroke volume index (r = − 0.429, p = 0.004), ejection fraction (r = − 0.408, p = 0.006), global circumferential strain (r = 0.420, p = 0.004) and global radial strain (r = − 0.530, p = 0.002). There were no significant correlations between LV GLS, native T1 or T2 measurements (p > 0.05). In this study, we demonstrated that LV GLS measured by FT-CMR improves 6 months after KT in association with reverse remodeling, but not native T1 or T2 measurements.


Author(s):  
Dan Zhu ◽  
Saki Ito ◽  
William R. Miranda ◽  
Vuyisile T. Nkomo ◽  
Sorin V. Pislaru ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document