Optimizing Diabetes Literacy: Lessons from African Canadians in Calgary about Type 2 Diabetes Diagnosis

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 231-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane I. Ekong ◽  
Shelly Russell-Mayhew ◽  
Nancy Arthur
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 2235042X1880165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Pouplier ◽  
Maria Åhlander Olsen ◽  
Tora Grauers Willadsen ◽  
Håkon Sandholdt ◽  
Volkert Siersma ◽  
...  

Objective: The aims of this study were to (1) quantify the development and composition of multimorbidity (MM) during 16 years following the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and (2) evaluate whether the effectiveness of structured personal diabetes care differed between patients with and without MM. Research design and methods: One thousand three hundred eighty-one patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes were randomized to receive either structured personal diabetes care or routine diabetes care. Patients were followed up for 19 years in Danish nationwide registries for the occurrence of outcomes. We analyzed the prevalence and degree of MM based on 10 well-defined disease groups. The effect of structured personal care in diabetes patients with and without MM was analyzed with Cox regression models. Results: The proportion of patients with MM increased from 31.6% at diabetes diagnosis to 80.4% after 16 years. The proportion of cardiovascular and gastrointestinal diseases in surviving patients decreased, while, for example, musculoskeletal, eye, and neurological diseases increased. The effect of the intervention was not different between type 2 diabetes patients with or without coexisting chronic disease. Conclusions: In general, the proportion of patients with MM increased after diabetes diagnosis, but the composition of chronic disease changed during the 16 years. We found cardiovascular and musculoskeletal disease to be the most prevalent disease groups during all 16 years of follow-up. The post hoc analysis of the intervention showed that its effectiveness was not different among patients who developed MM compared to those who continued to have diabetes alone.


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 386-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Indovina ◽  
Pierpaolo Falcetta ◽  
Stefano Del Prato

Modern treatment of T2DM requires a shift in paradigm with appropriate intensification of therapy from the very first time of diabetes diagnosis. This is supported by data showing how even a moderate delay in achieving good glycemic control can translate into a later increased risk of developing diabetic complications. The recognition of the complexity of the pathogenesis of T2DM leads to the appreciation of the importance of attacking the disease from different angles, i.e. simultaneous tackling of multiple mechanisms contributing to hyperglycemia. From the turn of century a growing number of new anti-hyperglycemic agents have been made available. As compared to the older ones, these new medicines have a more targeted mechanism of action as they act at the level of the specific pathophysiologic disturbances accounting the development and progression of hyperglycemia. Because of that drugs can be use in combination taking advantage of their complementary mechanisms of action and synergistic. If introduced earlier in the natural history of the disease combination therapy may contribute avoiding undesirable exposure to even mild chronic hyperglycemia and provide early benefits. With respect to that in this review we will discuss advantages, disadvantages and still unanswered questions related to the use of early combination therapy in type 2 diabetes.


Author(s):  
Hai Thanh Nguyen ◽  
Nhi Yen ◽  
Huong Hoang ◽  
Nga Hong ◽  
Hiep Xuan

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (OCE2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoe Pafili ◽  
Sophia Samara ◽  
Charilaos Dimosthenopoulos ◽  
Olga Gkortzi

AbstractIntroductionAccording to diabetes care standards nutrition therapy should be an integral part of diabetes management, and all individuals with diabetes should be referred to a registered dietitian for nutrition therapy at—or soon after—diagnosis and for ongoing follow-up. There is limited international data that indicate that a large percentage of people with diabetes have not received structured diabetes education and have not visited a dietitian. The aim of this study was to assess the involvement of dietitians in diabetes care in Greece.Materials and MethodsAll adult diabetic patients admitted to a secondary care general hospital in Greece during 30 consecutive days were included in the study. Patients admitted in the ICU, CICU, day clinics and hemodialysis patients were excluded. Data were obtained by personal interviews using a 40 item questionnaire which included 10 questions regarding number of visits to dietitians for diabetes management, whether patients were referred by their doctors or sought dietary advice by their own, reasons for visiting a dietitian, goal achievement and patient satisfaction.ResultsIn total 124 patients (68 males and 56 females) with diabetes were admitted to the hospital during the study period (4 type 1, 114 type 2 and 6 pregnancy diabetes). Data were obtained from 3 (22.8 ± 6 yrs, 26.1 ± 5.7kg/m2,8.3 ± 5.9 yrs with diabetes),105 (76.6 ± 11.3 yrs, 28.0 ± 5.3 kg/m2, 12.8 ± 9.3 yrs with diabetes), and 5 (32.6 ± 4.4 yrs, 28.5 ± 4.0 kg/m2) patients with type 1, type 2 and pregnancy diabetes respectively. Two out of 3 type 1 diabetes and 1 out of 5 patients with pregnancy diabetes interviewed reported to have been referred to a dietitian by their doctor. Only 5.7% (6 patients) of type 2 diabetes patients reported to have been referred to a dietitian by their doctor and another 5.7% have visited a dietitian on their own initiative. Five out of 6 referrals were at diabetes diagnosis. The number of encounters with a dietitian ranged from 1 to 24 with patients seeking to loose weight having the greater number of encounters. Of type 2 diabetes patients 94.3% did not receive lifestyle advice before commencing diabetes medication whereas 25% did not receive any dietary advice by any health professional even after starting medication.ConclusionsIn our cohort the majority of diabetes patients had not received dietary counseling by a dietitian, whereas about one fourth of type 2 diabetes patients had not received any dietary advice.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. e0190870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Schrijnders ◽  
Steven H. Hendriks ◽  
Nanne Kleefstra ◽  
Pauline A. J. Vissers ◽  
Jeffrey A. Johnson ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olayinka O. Shiyanbola ◽  
Earlise Ward ◽  
Carolyn Brown

<p class="Pa7"><strong>Objective: </strong>Illness representations, known as patients’ beliefs and expectations about an illness, may be influenced by cultural beliefs and personal experiences. This study explored African Americans’ perceptions of the sociocultural factors that influence their representations of diabetes.</p><p class="Pa7"><strong>Design: </strong>Six semi-structured focus groups.</p><p class="Pa7"><strong>Setting: </strong>Private space at a convenient site.</p><p class="Pa7"><strong>Participants: </strong>Forty African Americans, aged 45-60 years with type 2 diabetes for at least one year prior.</p><p class="Pa7"><strong>Results: </strong>Participants perceived that there was a race-mediated effect of how they developed diabetes because of poverty due to past slavery, racial discrimination by health care providers, and the stigma associated with diabetes within the African American community. Participants perceived that pov­erty influenced African Americans’ unhealthy eating habits, which led to diabetes diagnosis among their ancestors and their develop­ment of the disease since it was hereditary. Participants also perceived that there was provider ill intention, ie, providers were pur­posefully making people sick, and their lack of education on diabetes from providers was done on purpose, as information on diabetes was withheld and not shared due to racial discrimination. Perceived stigma by the com­munity led to African Americans’ avoidance and denial of the disease, and subsequently the development of diabetes.</p><p class="Pa7"><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To enhance disease manage­ment for African Americans with diabetes, it is important to focus on the sociocultural context of how African Americans view their world that may be influenced by their knowl­edge of negative historical circumstances and their current provider relationship, which, in turn, may be reflected in their perceptions of diabetes.</p><p class="Pa7"><em>Ethn Dis. </em>2018;28(1):25-32; doi:10.18865/ed.28.1.25.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document